Certainly not you carrying around your popgun, pally boy!
Big surprise, you take the childish route instead.
Certainly not you carrying around your popgun, pally boy!
Big surprise, you take the childish route instead.
Yes I am.
What does the NRA have to do with these murders?
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.
You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.
Your double standards are sick and disgusting.
Ridiculous. The blood is on MRS. LANZA'S hands for allowing her mentally-ill son to have access to guns.
If I were trading insults with a woman I'd call her a "bitch", not a "son of a bitch." Apparently this subtlety of insult is lost on you.
He murdered his mom.
What a sick person you are to blame her.
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.
You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.
Your double standards are sick and disgusting.
Duh. That's exactly the point. She enabled her mentally-ill son to have full access to guns and lost her life over it.
You haven't called SmarterThanNobody sick for saying the blood of the Sandy Hook kids is on my hands.
Your double standards are sick and disgusting.
I guess Christie believes that while she was dying, she told her son that he had permission to take the gun.![]()
Maybe christie believes the permission was implied because she didn't say not to take it.
And there it is; so which one was it Christie?
1 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she told him, why she was dying, that it was OK to have it?
or
2 - Did she allow / enable him to have her gun; because she didn't tell him, why she was dying, that he couldn't have it?
You all know she's not going to answer either of these; because it will show that she has no idea what she's complaining about.
So it is her fault that she loved her son and didn't believe he was a danger to anyone. And because she had a mentally ill child she should never have had firearms! My but aren't you a callous asshole.
Yeah, dumbshit. If you have a mentally ill child, you don't keep firearms within easy access. That's a no-brainer, but obviously too much for yours.
So it is her fault that she loved her son and didn't believe he was a danger to anyone. And because she had a mentally ill child she should never have had firearms! My but aren't you a callous asshole.
No she did not you sick liar. He broke into her gun safe and then killed her. I believe it was before, could be after, but it is a disgusting lie to claim she enabled him to ha e full access.
I have no double standards as I ha e not supported his contention, assure actually made it.
Think of it as the liberal version of "his name was Seth Rich."
What information do you have that he had easy access to the gun or are you just running on emotions, at this time?
Fate, huh?
Pretty fucking loving and benevolent god you have.
Read the report moron, all 114 pages of it, or else STFU. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2014/images/11/21/office.of.the.child.advocate.report.pdf.pdf
Why don't you just tell me the pertinent pages like the nice person you are. And I will read them. Asking me to just read a 114 pages is unreasonable.