Being An American, Obsolete Term?

cawacko said:
Based on where I live learning Spanish would be to my advantage in interacting with locals. From a business perspective I'd say learning Cantonese would be best based on the economic growth of China.
Click to expand...

It is impossible to get ahead in America without a knowledge of English in speech and comprehension, impossible. The business world requires it's employees to learn English for this reason internationally.

You're being silly and childish now and in another 20 years, you're either going to adapt to the third world immigrants where you live in Texas and embrace their culture and their language or leave because you will be a gringo (not of this place) and an outsider if you don't.
 
philly rabbit said:
Does anybody know why the Celts .. who predated the Anglo Saxons in Britain lost to the Invading Romans who went on to conquer Britain?

Clue: Because they fought them the same way as the American Indians fought the United States.

How did the Celts fight the Romans and how were the Romans and the United States similar in conquest of both?
Click to expand...


And for the general information of all the leftists here who claim that white people never derived from their own identity tribes.

The Celts lost to the invading Romans in Britain because they fought them on a tribe by tribe basis and not as one military unit with one military strategy much like the American Indian tribes fought the United States in the west during the Indian wars.

The invading Romans did fight as one unit with one battle strategy as did the U.S. and both won.
 
philly rabbit said:
And for the general information of all the leftists here who claim that white people never derived from their own identity tribes.

The Celts lost to the invading Romans in Britain because they fought them on a tribe by tribe basis and not as one military unit with one military strategy much like the American Indian tribes fought the United States in the west during the Indian wars.

The invading Romans did fight as one unit with one battle strategy as did the U.S. and both won.
Click to expand...

Read up about Caractacus and who supported him, and about the anti-Roman rising in Gaul. The Gauls and the British lacked a regular army, as did almost everyone the Romans defeated. The parallel between farmers, who remained (and remain) where they were in Britain and the hunter-gatherer tribes who predominated in America is so limited as to amount to nonsense.
 
philly rabbit said:
And for the general information of all the leftists here who claim that white people never derived from their own identity tribes.

The Celts lost to the invading Romans in Britain because they fought them on a tribe by tribe basis and not as one military unit with one military strategy much like the American Indian tribes fought the United States in the west during the Indian wars.

The invading Romans did fight as one unit with one battle strategy as did the U.S. and both won.
Click to expand...



we all came from Africa
 
philly rabbit said:
I hope you learn how to speak, read, write, and understand Spanish no later than 20 years from now.

You're going to need to.
Click to expand...
I don't think it will take 20 years dude. We've been so overruned here in the last 30 years that there is large areas where you never here english.

And if given the chance to vote, most will vote themselves money.
 
philly rabbit said:
It is impossible to get ahead in America without a knowledge of English in speech and comprehension, impossible. The business world requires it's employees to learn English for this reason internationally.

You're being silly and childish now and in another 20 years, you're either going to adapt to the third world immigrants where you live in Texas and embrace their culture and their language or leave because you will be a gringo (not of this place) and an outsider if you don't.
Click to expand...

I'm not following you on your first paragraph. I've already stated that English tends to be the international language of business. Is your point that I shouldn't learn another language even if I feel it will benefit me?

I live in California where I believe whites are no longer a majority. I have not had to embrace anyone else's culture and I'm not a gringo and an outsider. Let's be real real here. The majority of Hispanic immigrants coming to California are not all that educated nor do they tend to have a lot of money. Whites still run the power structure of California. That's reality. So if living in a state where whites aren't a majority of the people then California isn't for you. But the large majority of cultural events (in the Bay Area at least) are 'American'
 
philly rabbit said:
And for the general information of all the leftists here who claim that white people never derived from their own identity tribes.

The Celts lost to the invading Romans in Britain because they fought them on a tribe by tribe basis and not as one military unit with one military strategy much like the American Indian tribes fought the United States in the west during the Indian wars.

The invading Romans did fight as one unit with one battle strategy as did the U.S. and both won.
Click to expand...

Actually, it's about if America was founded on a tribal identity...which you claim and claim that we are losing to "multiculturalism." Just because tribes 'existed' in our far (far far) past, does not mean that we were OR that the Founding Fathers wanted that. They explicitly invented something NEW.

As I asked...please offer some examples of that tribal identity that we're attempting to preserve (that are different from other so-called tribal identities).
 
evince said:
we all came from Africa
Click to expand...

LOL

Exactly, if you want to go back to nearly prehistoric tribes, why not go all the way back?

Again, he's going to have to provide some evidence of this 'tribal identity' that the FOunding Fathers brought with them....and that's disappearing.
 
Lorca said:
LOL

Exactly, if you want to go back to nearly prehistoric tribes, why not go all the way back?

Again, he's going to have to provide some evidence of this 'tribal identity' that the FOunding Fathers brought with them....and that's disappearing.
Click to expand...

Certainly the people who settled our colonies went there mainly because they couldn't fit in with the 'tribal identity' in which they were brought up. It wasn't tribal at all though, actually - more what you might call multi-cultural. Scarcely any of my own ancestors at that time, for instance, spoke English, and there were similar differences all over the UK.
 
Liberty said:
I don't think it will take 20 years dude. We've been so overruned here in the last 30 years that there is large areas where you never here english.

And if given the chance to vote, most will vote themselves money.
Click to expand...

You haven't seen anything yet.

I'll assume you're white and you're heading for minority status. Remember it were the whites who stole the southwest from the Mexicans and don't think for a moment that the Mexicans don't know it.
 
philly rabbit said:
You haven't seen anything yet.

I'll assume you're white and you're heading for minority status. Remember it were the whites who stole the southwest from the Mexicans and don't think for a moment that the Mexicans don't know it.
Click to expand...

At least you're comfortable, in your idiocy. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top