Hence, it's all baseless conjecture.
It just sounds to me like you think you must be accommodated because you think yours is the vote that matters.
I'm telling you that it doesn't. Not when we can replace moderate voters at a nearly 2:1 clip with non-voters motivated for things like Medicare for All or a federal jobs guarantee. So they no longer have to work shitty jobs in order to get health care.
Anecdote forthcoming; I have a young friend who is 26 and who is a very accomplished and talented costume designer. He gets so many requests for commissions that he has to turn them down because he needs to work 35 hours a week at a bike shop at $15/hr in order to have health care. He also has student loans that he's paying, in addition to the premiums/deductibles/copays he pays for his health care.
If student debt was forgiven, and we had Medicare for All, he could quit the bike shop and start his own business and succeed because he is talented.
Only two candidates offer that, so who do you think he is going to vote for, and how many other people do you think are in that same situation?
This is the empathy that billionaires simply don't have because of how insulated they are.