Diogenes
You have insufficient privileges to post
I'll take the opinions of historians over that of a forum poster with a worshipful avatar of imaginary life under trump.
Opinions are like ....
I'll take the opinions of historians over that of a forum poster with a worshipful avatar of imaginary life under trump.
Your trump puffery is just opinion. At least historians tend to treat all presidents equally, which you would know if you had read all the links.Let's see... The Biden administration has let in millions of illegals and can't keep track of them. Has been given nearly $2 trillion in new spending and can't show anything for it. Seems to me his administration is far worse at administrative skills than Trump's.
International relations? Biden let a war start in Ukraine, did nothing about another one in the Middle East, oversaw the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle. One of the worst international relations records since WW 2.
Biden had no relationship with Congress. If he didn't show up to give a state of the union speech, you'd think he was MIA when it came to congressional relations. His cabinet officers and others within in his administration refused to cooperate with Congress in hearings and were threatened with contempt citations and even impeachment.
Trump is now a two-term president. I'd also say BIden is the one that was taking bribes from foreign nations, and doing lots of quid pro quo via his family. Jan 6 was not an "insurrection."
Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one and it stinks. I'd love to see the objective measures that "C-SPAN historians" used to get those numbers. My bet is they are nothing but SWAGPOOYA
There is just so much wrong with that list...
Democratic professors outnumber Republican ones by 9 to 1 ratio, according to new data | The College Fix
Profs donating to Democratic candidates outnumbered those giving to Republicans by 95 to 1 ratio.www.thecollegefix.com
Zero Republican professors found across 33 departments at seven universities: College Fix analysis | The College Fix
ANALYSIS: College Fix finds 50 percent of departments have no registered Republican professors in 2022.www.thecollegefix.com
...credit cards. Everybody has one.Opinions are like ....
...credit cards. Everybody has one.
No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.Your trump puffery is just opinion. At least historians tend to treat all presidents equally, which you would know if you had read all the links.
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.
No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?
I gave no opinion.I'll take the opinions of historians over that of a forum poster with a worshipful avatar of imaginary life under trump.
Is that the reason for the maga cult, assumed similarity?I suspect that because the left is corrupt they automatically assume others are corrupt as well.
It's the fallacy of assumed similarity. Their "lived experience". Their frame of reference.
Is that the reason for the maga cult, assumed similarity?
Are you posting as Land Barge? Because that's who I was responding to.I gave no opinion.
Fact: Trump’s the second president to win back the WH after being defeated.
Fact: Joe was given the hook by his own party.
No, they don't. They just give a ranking. There is no objective, factual evidence backing it up.<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?
Would you like me to do all your research and serve it to you on a silver platter?Can you PROVE there were objective measures behind that rating?
Would you like me to do all your research and serve it to you on a silver platter?No, they don't. They just give a ranking. There is no objective, factual evidence backing it up.
Why should Lincoln be #1 by the way?
No, you brought Lincoln up. I'd assume you could toss out a few reasons for rating him in first place.Would you like me to do all your research and serve it to you on a silver platter?
Yes, absolutely.Think so?
I already explained why I mentioned Lincoln.No, you brought Lincoln up. I'd assume you could toss out a few reasons for rating him in first place.
Yes, absolutely.