Biden Limps out of Office Ranked as Worst Modern President

Let's see... The Biden administration has let in millions of illegals and can't keep track of them. Has been given nearly $2 trillion in new spending and can't show anything for it. Seems to me his administration is far worse at administrative skills than Trump's.
International relations? Biden let a war start in Ukraine, did nothing about another one in the Middle East, oversaw the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle. One of the worst international relations records since WW 2.
Biden had no relationship with Congress. If he didn't show up to give a state of the union speech, you'd think he was MIA when it came to congressional relations. His cabinet officers and others within in his administration refused to cooperate with Congress in hearings and were threatened with contempt citations and even impeachment.


Trump is now a two-term president. I'd also say BIden is the one that was taking bribes from foreign nations, and doing lots of quid pro quo via his family. Jan 6 was not an "insurrection."



Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one and it stinks. I'd love to see the objective measures that "C-SPAN historians" used to get those numbers. My bet is they are nothing but SWAGPOOYA


There is just so much wrong with that list...




Your trump puffery is just opinion. At least historians tend to treat all presidents equally, which you would know if you had read all the links.
 
Your trump puffery is just opinion. At least historians tend to treat all presidents equally, which you would know if you had read all the links.
No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.
 
No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?
 
No, they don't. This is particularly true of ones recently in office. They treat them politically. If that weren't true, you could find objective measures to back up their claims, but you can't.

I suspect that because the left is corrupt they automatically assume others are corrupt as well.

It's the fallacy of assumed similarity. Their "lived experience". Their frame of reference.
 
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?


Can you PROVE there were objective measures behind that rating?
 
I'll take the opinions of historians over that of a forum poster with a worshipful avatar of imaginary life under trump.
I gave no opinion.
Fact: Trump’s the second president to win back the WH after being defeated.
Fact: Joe was given the hook by his own party.
 
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?
No, they don't. They just give a ranking. There is no objective, factual evidence backing it up.

Why should Lincoln be #1 by the way?
 
Back
Top