anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Yes.Are you posting as Land Barge? Because that's who I was responding to.
Yes.Are you posting as Land Barge? Because that's who I was responding to.
Would you like me to do all your research and serve it to you on a silver platter?
...noses. Everybody has one.You're entitled to your opinions.
And opinions are like .....
The historians made the claim, not I. But we can still be in agreement that Biden is not the worst president as ranked by Breitbart. Why should we take their word for it?You made the claim, not I.
I'll understand if you won't, naturally.
...noses. Everybody has one.
If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln,I already explained why I mentioned Lincoln.
<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?
But we can still be in agreement that Biden is not the worst president as ranked by Breitbart.
If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln, That was no explanation. It's nothing but a meaningless appeal to authority fallacy.
I know you must be pretending to be thick. I posted the opinions of a bunch of different historians who rated Lincoln as #1. They gave their reasons for doing so IN THE LINKS. You are free to believe them or not, just like I believe that any Breitbart opinion about Biden being the worst modern president is bullshit.If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln,
That was no explanation. It's nothing but a meaningless appeal to authority fallacy.
No. But the fact that they exhibit one or more of the following doesn't make me take them seriously: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.Is your only reason for rejecting the OP the source?
Not in this thread you didn't. "C-SPAN historians" does not name anyone. Aside from that, what makes Lincoln #1? Name a few of those historians you supposedly cited so I can review their thinking on this as it relates to their score on those polls that have it. My bet is the bullshit is 100% you and them.I know you must be pretending to be thick. I posted the opinions of a bunch of different historians who rated Lincoln as #1. They gave their reasons for doing so IN THE LINKS. You are free to believe them or not, just like I believe that any Breitbart opinion about Biden being the worst modern president is bullshit.
The measure the Left uses for success and ability in politics is how closely someone hews to their doctrine, dogma, and political beliefs. Success isn't measured by them in moving society forward and making it better, but rather in moving it Leftwards and making in their image.I suspect that because the left is corrupt they automatically assume others are corrupt as well.
It's the fallacy of assumed similarity. Their "lived experience". Their frame of reference.
The measure the Left uses for success and ability in politics is how closely someone hews to their doctrine, dogma, and political beliefs. Success isn't measured by them in moving society forward and making it better, but rather in moving it Leftwards and making in their image.
So, in the view of the Left dictators like Stalin, Mao, or more recently someone like Maduro, are successes and to be venerated. For everyone else, they are brutal, vicious, dictators that enslaved their populations and killed millions to do it (well, to be fair, Maduro has amateur standing only killing thousands).
Well that's a straight up lie.Nolte: Biden Limps out of Office Ranked as Worst Modern President
Joe Biden will stumble out of office next month ranked by voters as our worst modern president.www.breitbart.com
I wouldn't go that far. I've observed that they tend to shy away from discussing socialism's murderous past when they can.
Well, when you completely eschew religion and call it evil, vile, and to be eradicated, something has to fill that void. Nature abhors a vacuum. For the Left, they fill that void with politics and thus, politics becomes their religion.You're right on the money about the left's rigidly-enforced ideological purity. Their leftist lockstep hive mentality is reminiscent of the Inquisition, the Puritans, and the Calvinist movements.
Ironic that the modern fanatics despise the religion they've based their political litmus tests on.
Well that's a straight up lie. Not unexpected, considering the source though.