Biden Limps out of Office Ranked as Worst Modern President

I already explained why I mentioned Lincoln.
If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln,

<sigh> Every one of those links gives the reasons why each president received a certain number. For example, they all rate Lincoln as number one. You think there were no objective measures behind that rating?

That was no explanation. It's nothing but a meaningless appeal to authority fallacy.
 
If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln, That was no explanation. It's nothing but a meaningless appeal to authority fallacy.

I suspected as much.

Now, watch her dance.

iu
 
If you mean this post, which is the only one you've made in this thread mentioning Lincoln,



That was no explanation. It's nothing but a meaningless appeal to authority fallacy.
I know you must be pretending to be thick. I posted the opinions of a bunch of different historians who rated Lincoln as #1. They gave their reasons for doing so IN THE LINKS. You are free to believe them or not, just like I believe that any Breitbart opinion about Biden being the worst modern president is bullshit.
 
I know you must be pretending to be thick. I posted the opinions of a bunch of different historians who rated Lincoln as #1. They gave their reasons for doing so IN THE LINKS. You are free to believe them or not, just like I believe that any Breitbart opinion about Biden being the worst modern president is bullshit.
Not in this thread you didn't. "C-SPAN historians" does not name anyone. Aside from that, what makes Lincoln #1? Name a few of those historians you supposedly cited so I can review their thinking on this as it relates to their score on those polls that have it. My bet is the bullshit is 100% you and them.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that because the left is corrupt they automatically assume others are corrupt as well.

It's the fallacy of assumed similarity. Their "lived experience". Their frame of reference.
The measure the Left uses for success and ability in politics is how closely someone hews to their doctrine, dogma, and political beliefs. Success isn't measured by them in moving society forward and making it better, but rather in moving it Leftwards and making in their image.

So, in the view of the Left dictators like Stalin, Mao, or more recently someone like Maduro, are successes and to be venerated. For everyone else, they are brutal, vicious, dictators that enslaved their populations and killed millions to do it (well, to be fair, Maduro has amateur standing only killing thousands).
 
The measure the Left uses for success and ability in politics is how closely someone hews to their doctrine, dogma, and political beliefs. Success isn't measured by them in moving society forward and making it better, but rather in moving it Leftwards and making in their image.

So, in the view of the Left dictators like Stalin, Mao, or more recently someone like Maduro, are successes and to be venerated. For everyone else, they are brutal, vicious, dictators that enslaved their populations and killed millions to do it (well, to be fair, Maduro has amateur standing only killing thousands).

I wouldn't go that far. I've observed that they tend to shy away from discussing socialism's murderous past when they can.

You're right on the money about the left's rigidly-enforced ideological purity. Their leftist lockstep hive mentality is reminiscent of the Inquisition, the Puritans, and the Calvinist movements.

Ironic that the modern fanatics despise the religion they've based their political litmus tests on.
 
I wouldn't go that far. I've observed that they tend to shy away from discussing socialism's murderous past when they can.

Not because they don't support it, they do. It's because they don't want to, and can't admit how horrific it was. Their view is, This time for sure!
You're right on the money about the left's rigidly-enforced ideological purity. Their leftist lockstep hive mentality is reminiscent of the Inquisition, the Puritans, and the Calvinist movements.

Ironic that the modern fanatics despise the religion they've based their political litmus tests on.
Well, when you completely eschew religion and call it evil, vile, and to be eradicated, something has to fill that void. Nature abhors a vacuum. For the Left, they fill that void with politics and thus, politics becomes their religion.
 
I think that Obama, both while in office, and during his shadow government days after, has done far more damage to America, than his puppet Biden.

I am not a fan of Biden, he is a mean, arrogant, foolish, mentally ill, old man, but, he wasn't really a President, he was a victim of elder abuse and manipulation.

Harris was a disaster as VP, and worse as a Presidential Candidate.

The Democrats have had a long run of complete losers.

-
 
Back
Top