Biden Needs the IRS to TAX low-income Waiters & Waitresses

Your hairdresser that rents her salon and is treated as a contractor uses services such as Square for sure.

the point you refuse to accept, but is a fact, is Biden plans to go after low income tax compliance

He talks about how the rich needs to pay more, but the power of government will be used to go after the poor

it is a fact

In my world, the hairdresser that rents the salon uses the salon's credit card system to run cards. It costs less than Square.
Compliance is not the same thing as raising taxes. If someone is forced into compliance who wasn't before that is not raising their taxes. It is having them follow current law.

It won't affect the poor at all. What do you consider poor since you are claiming it would affect them.This only affects people cheating on their taxes. It seems you want to defend criminals.
 
giving government more money just means they spend more money. taxes are used to pay the interest on the debt. We don't live in a sound money environment - they have no intentions of paying down the debt, they want the tax base to increase so they can justify a bigger debt ceiling

Giving government less money just means they spend more money and go even more into debt. The biggest drivers of our current debt have been tax cuts that have decreased revenues.

The first legislation the current GOP House passed would have increased the debt and yet they claim they are the party of fiscal responsibility.
 
In my world, the hairdresser that rents the salon uses the salon's credit card system to run cards. It costs less than Square.
Compliance is not the same thing as raising taxes. If someone is forced into compliance who wasn't before that is not raising their taxes. It is having them follow current law.

It won't affect the poor at all. What do you consider poor since you are claiming it would affect them.This only affects people cheating on their taxes. It seems you want to defend criminals.

I always give a waitress a cash tip and hope she does not claim it on her taxes. I want her to cheat the system.
 
cuckoo cuckoo

So you think giving them more money will mean they spend less money?

cuckoo cuckoo

Did I say that? Your straw man argument is pretty cuckoo.
But then you could say cuckoo cuckoo for most of your posts.

The only way to balance a budget is to match spending to revenues. Since the Republicans refuse to tell us what spending they will cut the only way to balance the budget is by increasing revenues.
 
giving government more money just means they spend more money. taxes are used to pay the interest on the debt. We don't live in a sound money environment - they have no intentions of paying down the debt, they want the tax base to increase so they can justify a bigger debt ceiling

This is where talking points are proven to be just that- talking points. Your theory and talking point is based upon misconceptions and is actually a deception in itself.

Here is a clear example of how, if you invest in better ways to manage or control a system, it will reap huge benefits and rewards.

The IRS is overwhelmed with fraud- So much fraud- it prevents us from being able to bring down the deficit, and just be able to repay the debts of our nation.

This overwhelming of the IRS, keeps honest tax payers like you and I, and millions of others, to carry the burden of taxes solely on our shoulders.

By hiring more IRS auditors and agents, and putting more checks and balances in the system like the 1099k, it will help to keep more people honest!

Thank you for your understanding in advance!
 
Last edited:
This is where talking points are proven to be just that- talking points.

Here is a clear example of how, if you invest in better ways to manage or control a system, it will reap huge benefits and rewards.

The IRS is overwhelmed with fraud- So much fraud- it prevents us from being able to bring down the deficit, and just be able to repay the debts of our nation.

By hiring more IRS auditors and agents, and putting more checks and balances in the system like the 1099k, it will help to keep more people honest!

so a camera in the bedroom is another way to keep us honest, right? We can't trust you to not hurt someone, we will monitor you. Monitor your bank. monitor your bedroom.

more spying on activity that was once a trust system is how you propose you fund government in America
 
YEs, I directly quoted you

Do these two statements have the exact same meaning?

Giving government less money just means they spend more money
Giving them more money will mean they spend less money.


It seems you are incapable of understanding simple logic. What you have done is called the false dichotomy fallacy.
If you give governments more money or less money, they will still likely spend more because of economic growth and inflation.
 
so a camera in the bedroom is another way to keep us honest, right? We can't trust you to not hurt someone, we will monitor you. Monitor your bank. monitor your bedroom.

more spying on activity that was once a trust system is how you propose you fund government in America

Which party wants to put cameras in the bedroom and in the doctor's office by inserting government into those private spaces?
It seems you think requiring people to follow the law is a burden.
 
Back
Top