Biden Presidency Will Be The Best Thing For The Environment

[T. A. Gardner]

And the results of these should Biden implement them in red...

Rejoin the Paris Accord. Tank the economy
Ban all drilling. Totally tank the economy
Commit to green energy with the Green New Deal. Totally destroy the economy
Modify whatever parts of it to ease the economic impact, whatever. We have to cut emissions to save humanity from itself. Massively increase welfare because that's the only way to fix the impact
Commit to an efficient new grid. Tank the economy
Commit to saving the national monuments from exploration and extraction. An irrelevant gesture for the most part
Commit to efficient new energy projects. Well, this contradicts all of the above, so which is it?
Create green jobs. Tank the wages of workers
Become a world leader in fighting climate change. Nobody will care and it won't get you votes
Save the endangered species. All of them? Good luck with that!
Protect wildlife. Meaningless political sop there
Protect the oceans. End the plastic pollution. Clean up the mess. So now we end using plastic. That'll really tank the economy
Strive for clean air. We have clean air. What you are calling for is Tank the economy
Strengthen the EPA. More bureaucracy to tank the economy

That's how you become the most environmentally sensitive president since Teddy Roosevelt. And, like Roosevelt, become a one term president who is seen as a failure.

Even Biden won't do all that but he is going to be a far cry better than greedy selfish uncaring Trump.

At least Trump didn't tank the economy on his own. It took a Chinese manufactured virus to do that.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello T. A. Gardner,

At least Trump didn't tank the economy on his own. It took a Chinese manufactured virus to do that.

Actually, the way Trump handled it made it much worse than it had to be, which did impact the economy worse than had to happen. He owns that. We shall hold him responsible at the ballot box.

Tank the economy

No it doesn't have to if it is implemented properly. Green jobs are already displacing dirty jobs.

Massively increase welfare because that's the only way to fix the impact

Need to do it anyway.

Well, this contradicts all of the above, so which is it?

No, it doesn't. Green energy is actually more efficient than dirty energy because it harnesses natural processes without producing expensive environmental problems to deal with.

Tank the wages of workers

There is no reason that building an efficient sustainable energy system has to pay any less than continued environmental destruction jobs.

Become a world leader in fighting climate change.

Nobody will care and it won't get you votes

Wrong. Most people actually care about the environment we all have to live in. It is foolish to disregard it.

Save the endangered species.

All of them? Good luck with that!

We actually depend on biodiversity. Many of our medicines come from regions that are being destroyed. We need to learn how to fit into mother nature. Native Americans had the right idea.

Protect wildlife.

Meaningless political sop there

Just because you currently see no value in something is no reason to carelessly destroy.

Protect the oceans. End the plastic pollution. Clean up the mess.

So now we end using plastic. That'll really tank the economy

Nobody said we have to discontinue plastic but we certainly need to end the use of 'disposable' plastics. btw, back when America 'was great' in the 1950's -1960's we didn't have all this disposable plastic, nor were the oceans full of it. All of this plastic pollution happened since then.

Strive for clean air.

We have clean air. What you are calling for is Tank the economy

What good is an economy if nobody is left alive? We really have to consider not only the economy but life itself and sustainability. We humans are smart enough to think in the macroscopic sense. We need to be more careful. We need more government regulation to safely guide society forward with technology.

Strengthen the EPA.

More bureaucracy to tank the economy

The economy will be just fine. We can do all this and keep capitalism alive and thriving. Capitalism will always find a way to profit under any given circumstances. Ingenuity will prevail. Change may be scary but for the adept there will always be profit opportunities.

That's how you become the most environmentally sensitive president since Teddy Roosevelt.

And, like Roosevelt, become a one term president who is seen as a failure.

Trump is never going to earn any accolades for environmental sensitivity because he sees no profit in it for him. Biden is smart enough to listen to the people and be a real leader.

 

[Nordberg]

What Trump did to the envoronment. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...ys-trump-administration-impacted-environment/ he has been a disaster that a new president will take years to fix. Opening up even more dril;ling is just a gift for energy companies. They bought up cheap land for drilling that Trump permitted. They have millions of acres that already have . So they are not drilling on it. It is used for tax avoidance. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/oil-tax-break.asp Tax payers are subsidizing the power business.
It also does not create jobs. Jobs are plentiful in beginning businesses like alternative energy. That is who was hiring before Daffy fucked it up.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Nordberg,

What Trump did to the envoronment. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...ys-trump-administration-impacted-environment/ he has been a disaster that a new president will take years to fix. Opening up even more dril;ling is just a gift for energy companies. They bought up cheap land for drilling that Trump permitted. They have millions of acres that already have . So they are not drilling on it. It is used for tax avoidance. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/oil-tax-break.asp Tax payers are subsidizing the power business.
It also does not create jobs. Jobs are plentiful in beginning businesses like alternative energy. That is who was hiring before Daffy fucked it up.

High paid oil workers don't want to consider safer regular pay green jobs. They wanna hear what Trump has to say. It's hard to scale back when you've gotten used to a large income. Even if it is a safer clearner job that's better for America. They won't want to admit it. They wanna be told those old jobs are coming back.

 

[PoliTalker]

7 Tropical systems are being tracked.

5 have become named storms.

'No climate change,' yeah right.

Peak of hurricane season arrives with 7 active systems in the tropics

 

[T. A. Gardner]

7 Tropical systems are being tracked.

5 have become named storms.

'No climate change,' yeah right.

Peak of hurricane season arrives with 7 active systems in the tropics

You are wrong...

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello T. A. Gardner,

You are wrong...

If you think so then please explain why. What you posted doesn't do that.

 

[Granule]

Trump has routinely cut back on environmental regulations - which has resulted in environmental disaster.

15 Ways The Trump Administration Has Changed Environmental Policies

1. U.S. pulls out of Paris Climate Agreement

2. Trump EPA poised to scrap clean power plan

3. EPA loosens regulations on toxic air pollution

4. Rescinding methane-flaring rules

5. Trump announces plan to weaken Obama-era fuel economy rules

6. Trump revokes flood standards accounting for sea-level rise

7. Waters of the U.S. Rule revocation

8. NOAA green lights seismic airgun blasts for oil and gas drilling

9. Interior Department relaxes sage grouse protection

10. Trump officials propose changes to handling the Endangered Species Act

11. Migratory Bird Treaty Act reinterpretation

12. Trump unveils plan to dramatically downsize two national monuments

13. Executive order calls for sharp logging increase on public lands

14. Trump drops climate change from list of national security threats

15. EPA criminal enforcement hits 30-year low

Thank God for Donald Trump.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Hello T. A. Gardner,

If you think so then please explain why. What you posted doesn't do that.

Simple. A single data point is meaningless in statistics. There can be anomalies that average out over the long run. That there are at the moment seven storms in the Atlantic that could grow into something more is meaningless on its own. As the graph shows, the storm pattern has remained largely constant for decades with a few years of intense activity. Claiming climate change (aka Gorebal warming) as the sudden cause of the current situation is baseless and without factual evidence.

 

[Nordberg]

Hello T. A. Gardner,



These answers indicate a concern with money and wealth; and none for lives or sustainability.

I have to wonder.

After an individual has already achieved enough wealth to live in luxury for life, what is the point in seeking more? Especially when it destroys nature? We, who are alive hear and now, are not the only humans who will ever have to live on this planet. Such an obsession with wealth, prioritized over nature, shows no concern for those humans who will come after us, including one's own descendants.

Grandchildren's lives matter.

Type fast. The election is under 50 days away and Trumplestilskins are starting threads by the gross. They are showing desperation. Those getting paid are getting OT. We will be buried by the Qanoners and Vulpine followers. 4chan will be an accepted source for the next 50 days.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello T. A. Gardner,

Simple. A single data point is meaningless in statistics. There can be anomalies that average out over the long run. That there are at the moment seven storms in the Atlantic that could grow into something more is meaningless on its own. As the graph shows, the storm pattern has remained largely constant for decades with a few years of intense activity. Claiming climate change (aka Gorebal warming) as the sudden cause of the current situation is baseless and without factual evidence.

'Sudden?' There's nothing sudden about it.

"In a 1917 paper, Alexander Graham Bell wrote that the unrestricted burning of fossil fuels “would have a sort of greenhouse effect.” The man who invented the telephone four decades earlier added, “the net result is the greenhouse becomes a sort of hot-house.”

Bell was also concerned about the inevitable depletion of fossil fuels — “What shall we do when we have no more coal and oil?” So in a 1917 article for National Geographic Magazine, he urged the development of renewable ethanol fuel from agricultural waste, corn stalks, and saw-mill dust.” As one biographer wrote, Bell would “also explore ideas in energy conservation” and “solar heating.”"

100 years ago, Alexander Graham Bell warned us about the ‘greenhouse effect’
Back in 1917, the inventor of the telephone foresaw a future where coal and oil were replaced by renewable fuels.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Nordberg,

Type fast. The election is under 50 days away and Trumplestilskins are starting threads by the gross. They are showing desperation. Those getting paid are getting OT. We will be buried by the Qanoners and Vulpine followers. 4chan will be an accepted source for the next 50 days.

The desperation hangs in the air like a stench.