Into the Night
Verified User
Depends what Climate you are talking about
I have given several examples already. Answer the question put to you and stop evading.
Depends what Climate you are talking about
^^^Who gives a shit about the IPCC? The Church of Global Warming, that's who.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
^^^
Sybil proves he never passed a science class.
You're going to chafe if you keep doing that, Sybil.IMA SILLY FOOL
PLAYING ON THE COMPUTER
PLAYING WITH MYSELF
Climate does have temp and it constantly changes bu orbit and sun changes and many other things
Bulverism. Bigotry.I have given several examples already. Answer the question put to you and stop evading.
Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.
Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.
bigotry, bulverism,
There is no 'science of climate change'.So you are speaking very specifically to the scientific causes of climate change as per your understanding and expertise.
Climate 'scientists' are not scientists, since they deny and discard theories of science including the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.Can you explain to us why anyone should believe and trust your expertise over that of thousands of top scientists in this area?
'Expert' worship. Your high priests are not scientists or experts.That is a serious question as what you are doing is saying 'I know better than they do' and i am curious what leads one to believe that?
This number again?? Do you even know where this stupid number comes from??98 percent of climate scientists accept man as one huge cause of global warming.
There is no such thing as a 'climate scientist'.That shows that 2 percent of climate scientists do not believe it.
Popularity fallacy. Science does not use consensus. Climate 'scientists' discard theories of science, just like you do.So there are intelligent people who believe it is not happening or man does not contribute. But, you cannot give as much space to the 2 percent as you do the 98. You have to wonder what they are missing. That is far more logical than thinking the 2 percent outliers have it right and 98 percent are wrong.
Mantra 45 Rectal-Cranial Inversion Syndrome (RCIS)This number again?? Do you even know where this stupid number comes from??
'Climate scientists' aren't scientists. No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You are STILL ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, Nordbutt.
There is no such thing as a 'climate scientist'.
Popularity fallacy. Science does not use consensus. Climate 'scientists' discard theories of science, just like you do.
Mantra 1a.
Mantra 4a.
One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.
The global climate. How do you unambiguously define the global climate and what is its temperature? What is its visibility? What is its humidity? What other numeric values does it have?Depends what Climate you are talking about
98 percent of Roman Catholic cardinals accept Jesus Christ as one huge factor in human salvation.98 percent of climate scientists accept man as one huge cause of global warming.
I have given several examples already. Answer the question put to you and stop evading.
So you are speaking very specifically to the scientific causes of climate change as per your understanding and expertise.
Can you explain to us why anyone should believe and trust your expertise over that of thousands of top scientists in this area?
That is a serious question as what you are doing is saying 'I know better than they do' and i am curious what leads one to believe that?
The global climate. How do you unambiguously define the global climate and what is its temperature? What is its visibility? What is its humidity? What other numeric values does it have?
Your view makes no sense
You mean government and UN scientist that have a monoply and won't allow opposing views in their studies. They are paid to get a specific result and if you don't do that you will be gone
Ask the IPCC I don't believe their doom and gloom. They manipulate data that is why they think every year is the hottest year
^^^There is no data. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. The IPCC makes up data out of thick air.