Biden

Any nation that votes in a guy who has 300 MILLION dollars of "hidden" debt. Who REFUSES to release his income taxes. Who is a pathogical liar, who paid "hush money" to porn star; who brags about his fondness for brutal dictators, etc.etc.etc.....deserves to get screwed AGAIN!

AVOIDANCE OF TOPIC...

Your thoughts on the court packing issue?
 
Reds are packing it as we speak. Are you OK with that?
No they aren't. "Packing the court" involves expanding the size of the court beyond nine justices (and filling those spots with ideologues)... Reds have never advocated for such a thing...

They said they would not allow a Supreme to be seated in the last year of a president's term. That is is the right thing to allow the next president to pick it. Mitch left a seat open for over a year because of the deeply held belief.
While his wording back then was completely retarded (and btw, he was only mimicking JOE BIDEN'S WORDS from back in 1992... look up the "Biden Rule"), he had every Constitutional authority to do what he did in 2016...

Now he is trying to get Amy Covid Barrett seated with week to go.
He has every Constitutional authority to do what he is doing right now...

Why should the Dems recognize the old tenets, when Mitch blows right through them?
The Dem choice is allow The Repub packed court to conduct business for decades or to fix it so the people's choices are in the seats.
Dems hate the Constitution. They hate law and order. They deeply desire power and control over everyone else... That's why they wish to pack the court. That's why they "cheat to win", since they can't legitimately win anymore...

The Democrat Party is controlled by sick Satanic fucks who will one day be damned to the lake of fire for all of eternity if they do not repent and change their ways...
 
Proposition: Any nation that votes in a guy for President who pointedly refuses to tell you what he thinks about the idea of Supreme Court packing deserves to get deeply fucked.



Discuss.

Why? Why suddenly is this an issue, or rather, why is it some Trumpkins think this is suddenly an issue?

Would it be better if told Americans that Mexico was going to pay for a wall across our southern border
 
No they aren't. "Packing the court" involves expanding the size of the court beyond nine justices (and filling those spots with ideologues)... Reds have never advocated for such a thing...


While his wording back then was completely retarded (and btw, he was only mimicking JOE BIDEN'S WORDS from back in 1992... look up the "Biden Rule"), he had every Constitutional authority to do what he did in 2016...


He has every Constitutional authority to do what he is doing right now...


Dems hate the Constitution. They hate law and order. They deeply desire power and control over everyone else... That's why they wish to pack the court. That's why they "cheat to win", since they can't legitimately win anymore...

The Democrat Party is controlled by sick Satanic fucks who will one day be damned to the lake of fire for all of eternity if they do not repent and change their ways...

Packing the Court is a common occurrence among many State Governments, and regardless of all the excuses and rationalizations offered, Mitch speed racing a nomination thru just two and half weeks prior to a Presidential election is just wrong, all part of a game he has been playing with Judges for close to a decade now

And as far as the Constitution, no where in the Constitution is nine Judges established as the number, and as far as precedent and tradition is concerned, Mitch has pretty much ignored such regarding the Judiciary just as he has done the Senate, so forget the "Dems hate the Constitution etc" rant
 
I'm against it.
What are your thoughts on Biden refusing to give you a straight answer about whether or not he is going to do it... even outright telling you that you don't deserve to know his stance on the issue??

What are your thoughts on trump refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses?
I think that Trump is very smart for refusing to promise that he will definitely accept the results of an election which has not yet occurred (details are important). He took the same stance in 2016, and I agreed with it then, so this is nothing new.

What are your thoughts on the media refusing to ask Biden a similar question, as to whether or not he will accept the results of the November election?? As Trump rightly points out, Democrats STILL haven't accepted the results of the election that happened FOUR YEARS AGO (as evidenced by their constant hoaxes, the pathetic impeachment attempt, and various other coup attempts).
 
Packing the Court is a common occurrence among many State Governments,
No it isn't... not as I have defined those words in my prior comment, anyway... You continue to completely avoid the discussion at hand...

and regardless of all the excuses and rationalizations offered,
... at least you are being honest that you don't give a fuck about rationalizing your position... At this point, since you are openly admitting this to be the case, there is nothing more for me to discuss with you. You outright deny logic, as well as the US Constitution and its status as the "law of the land". You are a radical leftist sheep, forever lost to the void of irrationality...

Mitch speed racing a nomination thru just two and half weeks prior to a Presidential election is just wrong,
I understand that your "feelers" are "full of emotion", pumped into you by the mainstream media that spoon feeds it to you. But what you continue to deny is the US Constitution, and the powers that are granted to the President and the Senate regarding SCOTUS seats. The President is not elected to a three year term, dumbass... It is still the President's term...

all part of a game he has been playing with Judges for close to a decade now
Doing the Constitutional duty to "advise and consent" is not "a game"...

And as far as the Constitution, no where in the Constitution is nine Judges established as the number,
Correct.

and as far as precedent and tradition is concerned, Mitch has pretty much ignored such regarding the Judiciary just as he has done the Senate,
No he hasn't. He has been fulfilling his Constitutional duty to "advise and consent".

so forget the "Dems hate the Constitution etc" rant
No. Dems HATE the Constitution. For a few examples:

** They reject the limits on the legislative powers of Congress. (thus rejecting Article I)

** They reject the executive powers of the President if they happen to not like the President, and they reject the Electoral College. They reject the proper method and reasoning for removing a President from office. They reject the enumerated duties of a President, especially the duties of preserving/defending/protecting the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article II)

** They reject the scope and role of SCOTUS and other inferior courts. They believe that SCOTUS are the sole interpreters of the US Constitution. They believe that SCOTUS are oligarchs. (thus rejecting Article III)

** They reject the Republican form of government that is guaranteed to the States. They reject protecting the States from invasions and domestic violence (especially when relating to immigration, and now Antifa and BLM as well). (thus rejecting Article IV)

** They reject the formal amendment process, and instead regularly misuse the court system as a "work-around" to that. They wish to transform the USA into the USSA (United Socialist States of America). (thus rejecting Article V)

** They reject legislating in pursuance of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VI)

** They reject that the States (collectively) are the owners of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VII)

** They also reject many of the Amendments to the Constitution, and actively fight against people's inherent rights (such as the right to have and express an opinion, freedom of religion, right to keep and bear arms, right to not wear a mask, due process, etc...)


So, as you can see, liberals reject the whole works. It gets in their way. They hate the document. They hate freedom. They hate self-governance. They hate America. Fuck the Satanic liberals!
 
Last edited:
Proposition: Any nation that votes in a guy for President who pointedly refuses to tell you what he thinks about the idea of Supreme Court packing deserves to get deeply fucked.



Discuss.

Anybody who votes for a man who REFUSES to release his taxes FOUR years later, is simply a gullible and stupid voter.
 
What are your thoughts on Biden refusing to give you a straight answer about whether or not he is going to do it... even outright telling you that you don't deserve to know his stance on the issue??


I think that Trump is very smart for refusing to promise that he will definitely accept the results of an election which has not yet occurred (details are important). He took the same stance in 2016, and I agreed with it then, so this is nothing new.

What are your thoughts on the media refusing to ask Biden a similar question, as to whether or not he will accept the results of the November election?? As Trump rightly points out, Democrats STILL haven't accepted the results of the election that happened FOUR YEARS AGO (as evidenced by their constant hoaxes, the pathetic impeachment attempt, and various other coup attempts).

I just read your other post where you said you don't believe me, so we're done here.
 
I'll add a second proposition here:

On COVID 19 Joke Biden wants what amounts to a "do over." He wants to take the US back to March of this year and redo the whole COVID 19 crisis even as it is winding down today. He wants a national mask mandate replete with criminal penalties for not wearing one. He wants a new PPE production boost even as there is no shortage of PPE today. He wants a new economic and personal lockdown of everything even as the economy and people are beginning to return to normal.

Seems to me that he's like 6 + months behind the curve on decision making on this issue. I guess he does deserve the "Slow Joe" or "Sleepy Joe" moniker after all.
 
Back
Top