Bill Maher On Islam: "All Religions Are Not Alike"

Had we done this because some filmstrip was created depicting Jebus in a comic way I might agree that it was equivalent. If Christians surrounded a Libyan Embassy, launched RPGs at it, then raped and killed Libyan Ambassadors I might further agree.

No,we did it for a terrible reason, greed. I thought you said it wasn't over the film, so which is it Damo,you can't change your argument depending on which thread you are in at the time.
 
No,we did it for a terrible reason, greed. I thought you said it wasn't over the film, so which is it Damo,you can't change your argument depending on which thread you are in at the time.

Then you agree it wasn't religion that drove your example? Then it isn't salient to the thread. Reality: Christianity had nothing to do with an undeclared war in Iraq.

And I didn't say the raping and killing of the Ambassador was over the film. Re-read and pay attention. There are two sentences, one was about "invading" the other was about people killing Ambassadors.
 
Then you agree it wasn't religion that drove your example? Then it isn't salient to the thread. Reality: Christianity had nothing to do with an undeclared war in Iraq.

And I didn't say the raping and killing of the Ambassador was over the film. Re-read and pay attention. There are two sentences, one was about "invading" the other was about people killing Ambassadors.

Christianity had more to do with it than you will ever admit, you are still a closet Christian.

I am paying attention, you smug asshole.
 
Christianity had more to do with it than you will ever admit, you are still a closet Christian.
Nutters. You are just babbling and simply relaying a false belief about me, neither of which have anything to do with this thread. It's a sad and purposeless ad hom attack.

I am paying attention, you smug asshole.
Then why did you think you had a "gotcha" moment when you didn't? Pay attention and you may actually be able to speak on topic rather than pointing out non-sequiturs and relaying something you know to be false and purposeless ad hom.
 
Nutters. You are just babbling and simply relaying a false belief about me, neither of which have anything to do with this thread. It's a sad and purposeless ad hom attack.


Then why did you think you had a "gotcha" moment when you didn't? Pay attention and you may actually be able to speak on topic rather than pointing out non-sequiturs and relaying something you know to be false and purposeless ad hom.

You are so self important, and still an asshole.

You said it would be comparable if we attacked over a film about Jesus, yet, it has been stated that that wasn't the reason for the attack on the embassey in Libya, but it has been stated that the attack wasn't about the film, it was planned before, so which is it? Were the riots about the film or is there something deeper happening here.

Just like our war on Iraq, it want about weapons of mass destruction, it was fueled by the USA wanting revenge on the 911 killers,who were Muslim, Boykin said aloud what many were whispering behind closed doors and our President had to come out and "claim" it was not Islam we were at war with, although many Christians did feel it was war with Islam.

So, Damo, like someone mentioned at one time, if you werent so busy playing Dali Damo, maybe you would be more clear in your presenting your thoughts and people could understand what you are trying to say.

I don't babble, I just made a statement you don't agree with so you feel I am not paying attention, you are arrogant and I point it out and you don't like it, sorry.
 
Last edited:
You are so self important, and still an asshole.
Just another nonsense ad hom that has little meaning in this thread.

You said it would be comparable if we attacked over a film about Jesus, yet, it has been stated that that wast the reaon for the attack on the embassey in Libya, but it has been stated that the attack want about the film, it was planned before, so which is it? We're the riots about the film or is there something deeper happening here.
Yes, again. I'll slow it down for you. There were two sentences, one was about equivalence (filmstrip) another was about what they are doing in the name of their religion (raping and killing Ambassadors).

Now, if Christians (since you want that one to be about equivalence too), in the name of Jebus raped and killed the Libyan Ambassador I'd agree to another equivalence. When that happens be sure to notify us by posting a link to the story and film clips of him being dragged through our streets to cheering mobs of Christians.

Just like our war on Iraq, it want about weapons of mass destruction, it was fueled by the USA wanting revenge on the 911 killers,who were Muslim, Boykin said aloud what many were whispering behind closed doors and our President had to come out and "claim" it was not Islam we were at war with, although many Christians did feel it was war with Islam.
It certainly wasn't about Jesus. The reality is, it has no real purpose in this thread which is about what the religions do. Poland is the only Christian nation I know, had they attacked because the Muslims refused to believe that Jebus was a God then you'd have something, but they didn't.

So, Damo, like someone mentioned at one time, if you werent so busy playing Dali Damo, maybe you would be more clear in your presenting your thoughts and people could understand what you are trying to say.
Or you could pay attention and read and respond to what I write rather than what you wanted it to say.

I don't babble, I just made a statement you don't agree with so you feel I am not paying attention, you are arrogant and I point it out and you don't like it, sorry.
You babble, especially during weak and purposeless ad homs. Now, do you have something to say on topic, or will you create yet another silly "attack" post trying to "win" by calling Damocles a Christian... :rolleyes:
 
Just another nonsense ad hom that has little meaning in this thread.


Yes, again. I'll slow it down for you. There were two sentences, one was about equivalence (filmstrip) another was about what they are doing in the name of their religion (raping and killing Ambassadors).

Now, if Christians (since you want that one to be about equivalence too), in the name of Jebus raped and killed the Libyan Ambassador I'd agree to another equivalence. When that happens be sure to notify us by posting a link to the story and film clips of him being dragged through our streets to cheering mobs of Christians.


It certainly wasn't about Jesus. The reality is, it has no real purpose in this thread which is about what the religions do. Poland is the only Christian nation I know, had they attacked because the Muslims refused to believe that Jebus was a God then you'd have something, but they didn't.


Or you could pay attention and read and respond to what I write rather than what you wanted it to say.


You babble, especially during weak and purposeless ad homs. Now, do you have something to say on topic, or will you create yet another silly "attack" post trying to "win" by calling Damocles a Christian... :rolleyes:

You don't attack directly, you are passive aggressive and make snide comments like you will "slow it down". You don't see that your argument is baseless if you contend the riots didn't really happen because of the film.

But you believe I am just "babbling" another indirect insult.
 
Apparently I am supposed to say this for some reason:

Grind watches bill maher every week and has seen every episode of realtime since it started 9 years ago, dipshit (quoting, not my own words there).
 
Blaming Islam for all terrorist acts commited by Muslims is just as silly as blaming Christianity for all acts of terrorism committed by Christians, isn't it?
 
Apparently I am supposed to say this for some reason:

Grind watches bill maher every week and has seen every episode of realtime since it started 9 years ago, dipshit (quoting, not my own words there).

you were supposed to quote a certain post. duhhh. but a for effort.
 
Part of the problem of identifying them is they are often 'hate crimes' and of course not recognized as violently religious. They are of course...just look at the KKK and many of the Nazi organizations, the 'patriot' movement...there is a lot of 'christianity' and hate involved. We down play our violently religious.

This.

We've gotten to the point that if it happens in an arabic country, it's muslim violence. Imagine if other countries did that, Japan could look over and say, "Damn Christians, shooting up theaters and temples, racially attacking others, hating gays, that jesus guy must have been a real prick."
 
"The Last Temptation of Christ" and "Dogma" were heavily picketed and protested. The prick from Westboro calls for the death to queers and Falwell told Orlando that it would be firebombed by God. Make a movie about Joseph Smith and his strange behaviors and let's see what sort of reaction it causes. The Scientologist are very vindictive for even so much as criticizing their faith and there are numerous cases alleging that they have kidnapped and tortured people to death who tried to leave the church. The ADL will come down hard on you if you even criticize the state of Israel.

Certainly, Islam needs to moderate but this pretense that only they can be whipped into a violent frenzy is nonsense.
The difference is that small groups of Christians blasted Dogma and The Last Temptation, while numerous Islamic countries gave had violent reactions to this moronic video
 
The difference is that small groups of Christians blasted Dogma and The Last Temptation, while numerous Islamic countries gave had violent reactions to this moronic video

603336_10151154264928006_524265776_n.jpg


This is the hope of the Muslim nations, and they are quietly sidelined and ostracized, often left in a insurmountable bubble of silence and fear.
 
Back
Top