Bill preventing activist judges from blocking Trump's agenda backed by White House

MAGATs are too stupid to realize the implications of this. If the judiciary is no longer able to block presidential actions, it applies to a (D) POTUS as well. The next (D) president can restore DEI, affirmative action, student loan forgiveness, block anti-abortion laws in the states that have them, restore rights to LGBTQ ppl, actually institute the "open borders" that the idiotic MAGATs insist exist, grant citizenship to every single "illegal" in the nation, restore teachers' ability to discuss whatever in their classrooms, etc. etc. etc.

Yep, every single thing that the MAGATs abhor can be put in place by a (D) president. I doubt this will pass. But it's definitely categorized as "Be careful what you wish for."
MAGAS do not care IMO they want Trump to be the first KING / DICTATOR of the USA.
They are too stupid to even see this themselves.
 
MAGAS do not care IMO they want Trump to be the first KING / DICTATOR of the USA.
They are too stupid to even see this themselves.
Agreed. MAGAts are actively supporting an authoritarian state. This is why I believe any that swore an oath to the Constitution to be traitors.

vr7R94c.gif
 
Yes they do now. When the case directly affects the President's agenda that 80 million people voted for it rises to the level of importance to go directly to the SCOTUS.

You sad MAGATs are so fixated on Trump's squeaker of a win, which was by only 1.5% of total votes cast. You have no mandate. 80M out of 330M Americans isn't squat. Even if it was, your #FatFascistFelon still has to obey our laws. He's not a king despite his beliefs that he is. You ppl truly are into fascism these days. Disgusting.
 
Agreed. MAGAts are actively supporting an authoritarian state. This is why I believe any that swore an oath to the Constitution to be traitors.

vr7R94c.gif
Well maybe NOT any but the ones that break that oath should be considered Traitors .
Agreed. MAGAts are actively supporting an authoritarian state. This is why I believe any that swore an oath to the Constitution to be traitors.

vr7R94c.gif
And IMO there should be some repercussions for any elected official like Sen. McConnell who broke his oath to be an impartial juror and vote on the evidence in an impeachment trial, then turns around and comes out and says the evidence DID show that Trump did what he was charged with but he was not going to vote to remove him from office.
That was an out right breaking of that oath and we need to have a way to discipline people who do break those oaths.
IF he had voted on the evidence like he swore to we would NOT be having the trouble we have now.
 
MAGATs are too stupid to realize the implications of this. If the judiciary is no longer able to block presidential actions, it applies to a (D) POTUS as well. The next (D) president can restore DEI, affirmative action, student loan forgiveness, block anti-abortion laws in the states that have them, restore rights to LGBTQ ppl, actually institute the "open borders" that the idiotic MAGATs insist exist, grant citizenship to every single "illegal" in the nation, restore teachers' ability to discuss whatever in their classrooms, etc. etc. etc.

Yep, every single thing that the MAGATs abhor can be put in place by a (D) president. I doubt this will pass. But it's definitely categorized as "Be careful what you wish for."
:magagrin:
 
"activist judges" meaning anyone who disagrees with Trump's agenda.

Exactly. I'm sure more than a dozen of the judges who have ruled against Trump were appointed by him during the previous Four Long Years of Sorrow.

Maybe instead of trying to remove rights from citizens, he would be better off focusing on restoring the economy and our standing in the world. And by standing I don't mean to make America the world's bully.
 
Exactly. I'm sure more than a dozen of the judges who have ruled against Trump were appointed by him during the previous Four Long Years of Sorrow.

Maybe instead of trying to remove rights from citizens, he would be better off focusing on restoring the economy and our standing in the world. And by standing I don't mean to make America the world's bully.
Agreed. The Party of Trump attcks anyone who doesn't agree with them 100%. Notice that Trump is even attacking SCOTUS.

Agreed, but it's clear Trump doesn't care. He's focused upon enriching his rich friends and putting our government in control of an oligarchy AKA privatization of government.
 
Well maybe NOT any but the ones that break that oath should be considered Traitors .

And IMO there should be some repercussions for any elected official like Sen. McConnell who broke his oath to be an impartial juror and vote on the evidence in an impeachment trial, then turns around and comes out and says the evidence DID show that Trump did what he was charged with but he was not going to vote to remove him from office.
That was an out right breaking of that oath and we need to have a way to discipline people who do break those oaths.
IF he had voted on the evidence like he swore to we would NOT be having the trouble we have now.
All MAGAts who swore the oath and support an authoritarian state are traitors since they are breaking their oaths by doing so.

While I agree on McConnell, let's not forget that no President who has been impeached in the past 30+ years have been convicted even though they each deserved it.
 
Yes they do now. When the case directly affects the President's agenda that 80 million people voted for it rises to the level of importance to go directly to the SCOTUS.
That's not how things work. Have you ever taken a civics or government class? Read Article III, Section 2, Clause 2.
 
MAGAts are against the Constitution. They believe it's whatever their Orange Jesus says it is.
They're not referring to the Constitution. They have intentionally and loudly discarded it. The courts are the last check and balance, and they want them neutralized. These people are terrifying fascists.
 
Back
Top