Bill preventing activist judges from blocking Trump's agenda backed by White House

Lionfish said:
View attachment 46507
Click to expand...
9hc3k1.gif
 
FastLane said:
Article III judges were established by Congress and they are unelected and some liberal activist judge in Washington state should not be able to stymie the agenda that 80 million people voted for. If this bill passes the ability to place a temporary restraining order on the Chief Executive will be limited. As it currently is the ability to put a TRO on the Executive office for duties that are the responsibility of the President is debatable. Should Federal judges restrict the Presidents ability to direct the use of our military?
Click to expand...
FastLane said:
Your babbling does not change the fact that the above bill in Congress is about to clip the wings of activist judges. Checkmate.
Click to expand...
You ARE fucking stupid! The "bill" you wet dream over is pure MAGA BS. Here's the law https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/

And as Chief Justice Roberts told your Cheeto Jeezus, “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Hefre's an explanation as to why you'll have blue balls waiting for that impeachment: www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/can-congress-impeach-federal-judge-why-it-wont-happen-rcna196937
 
FastLane said:
Oh yeah that is a credible source.
:okjen: :okjen:

:magagrin:

You are too stupid to even talk to. :rofl2:
Click to expand...
:palm: You're arrogant ignorance is astounding. Silly assed memes are the last refuge of an intellectually limited MAGA mook: Observe and learn:

Greg Palast Awards
David Thomas Prize, Financial Times, 1997
Investigative Story of the Year, Industrial Society, 1998
Business Writer of the Year nomination, UK Press Association, 1999
Politics Story of the Year, Salon.com, 2000, for reports on U.S. elections
 
FastLane said:
Bill preventing...
Click to expand...
Worth noting, Republicans have the smallest majority in the House in a hundred years. To get anything passed, they need to not have a single defector, or have Democrats make up for the defector. Then it goes to the Senate, where they need to get enough votes for closure. That would require a number of Democrats supporting the bill.

Do you think Democrats are going to help you hide trump's crimes?
 
Walt said:
Worth noting, Republicans have the smallest majority in the House in a hundred years. To get anything passed, they need to not have a single defector, or have Democrats make up for the defector. Then it goes to the Senate, where they need to get enough votes for closure. That would require a number of Democrats supporting the bill.

Do you think Democrats are going to help you hide trump's crimes?
Click to expand...
At this point, I'm not discounting any possibility. If worded just right and presented a certain way, you'll have Dems voting with the gov't of Cheeto Jeezus.
 
Taichiliberal posted:

“***You're*** arrogant ignorance is astounding.” (Asterisks are mine).

Too funny
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top