Citation needed.True, but your naive understanding of it isn’t, even Jefferson dumped the strict constructionist view of the Constitution early
Citation needed.True, but your naive understanding of it isn’t, even Jefferson dumped the strict constructionist view of the Constitution early
Deflecting is a poor debate tactic.Hardly, being a strict constructionist he saw there existed no provision in the Constitution that a President could purchase land from a foreign nation (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-louisiana-purchase-jeffersons-constitutional-gamble). However he did recognize the value to the country and as all know, purchase the land. And this is not the only example on how he swayed from being a strict constructionist
Tiresome little troll.Laughable, after being proven wrong the “big chiwawa” wants to play a semantics game
Well, he’s wrong again, my actual comment was “even Jefferson dumped the strict constructionist view of the Constitution early,” meaning he was a strict constructionist but abandoned that position early
Two swings and misses in a row, want to try to strike out
If you can prosecute them or arrest them you have jurisdiction, dumb shit.Right. Besides the fact that we don't have true jurisdiction over those who are here illegally, there's also the reality of the purpose of birthright citizenship. A) grant the children of slaves, who were brought here against their will, citizenship and b) grant the children of immigrants citizenship.
People who participate in birth tourism or waddle 100 feet across the southern border to squeeze out a kid in the desert aren't migrating here LIKE people were in the early years of our country. Those people were given citizenship at the shore.
Where is that in the Constitution halfwit? Birthright is not contained there either. Nor is abortion on demand.Not, in Jefferson’s own words:
“ A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen: but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property & all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means…. It is incumbent on those only who accept of great charges, to risk themselves on great occasions, when the safety of the nation, or some of it’s very high interests are at stake.”
(https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-37-02-0220)
Got anything else I can embarrass you on?
Yes, they are real. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98y4n853vmo Tunnels have been found for generations. They also come from Mexico and other countries. You need to fence off the Pacific ocean and the Gulf of Trump. They come by boats. Most illegals fly in and stay illegally. Your fence better be high.
This is why I say to never argue with a lying leftist halfwit. It will only end up in a never-ending circle of stupidity.Wrong, and according to you your idiocy, how can something be “constitutional”if it is not in the Constitution
Yes, you are very simple. Which is why you are a lying, terrorist loving dumbass on steroids.' All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. '
Simple.
evil corporations is a real thing.
just as evil government is a real thing.
the most evil is when they work together in fascism.
stateless underclass, indentured servitude, evil corporations.....
fascism, "supply side" corporate banker cocksucking.
Poor Troofie. Thrashed again.Yes, you are very simple. Which is why you are a lying, terrorist loving dumbass on steroids.
you need to fix your fascism problem, neocon.
Really? If I travel to Mexico, which I do every year, and I get arrested for being drunk in public, suddenly I'm not a US citizen solely because I got arrested?If you can prosecute them or arrest them you have jurisdiction, dumb shit.
It's actually not debating at all. A pivot fallacy isn't even a valid argument. It's an attempt to avoid debating.Deflecting is a poor debate tactic.
Go learn what a subject of jurisdiction is. Your mindless chanting won't work.If you can prosecute them or arrest them you have jurisdiction, dumb shit.
Assumption of victory fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Get off your recreational drug, moonbat.Poor Troofie. Thrashed again.
Haw, haw..............................haw.
Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fascism' means. Go learn what 'communism' means.you need to fix your fascism problem, neocon.
they're valid words, ass felcher.Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fascism' means. Go learn what 'communism' means.