Birth Right Citizenship Will It Finally End?

IBDaMann said:
Correct. Well-copied.


Correct. "Free Pass" isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.

However, what does the 14th Amendment say about those born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, irrespective of who their parents are and irrespective of any crimes committed by other people?


Let's get off your totally irrelevant tanget about crimes committed by other people and get back to the child born in the US who has not committed any crime. Is the child born in the US somehow not born in the US? What does the 14th Amendment read?


Legal writer Edward Erler, in his 2015 Claremont Review piece, gets it wrong. The Founders didn't write the 14th Amendment and Erler doesn't get to say what the 14th Amendment "never intended".


... was not even involved in the adoption of the 14th Amendment.


The correct answer is that the executive order is unconstitutional because it violates the Constitution. There is no "pressure" involved.
Click to expand...
Dude, I got your opinion about a hundred comments ago. This last comment of mine, I told anyone that can read that I was just tapping my fingers to get out my thoughts. I guess it was a bit between the lines, but the point was, go ahead a say my opinion sucks or maybe you agree, but don't expect another round of the same shit. You didn't quite get it, that's ok, this is hopefully clearer.

Unless you're actually a dumbass you know that there are those far more qualified and studied and accomplished people out there that have essentially the same takes as you or I.

We'll just have to see what happens. Can you handle that?

Now, here comes the sanctimonious bullshit about what I clearly don't understand and what you so clearly do. LOL Can't wait, try to mix it up this time for a little variety.
 
IBDaMann said:
Correct. Well-copied.


Correct. "Free Pass" isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.

However, what does the 14th Amendment say about those born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, irrespective of who their parents are and irrespective of any crimes committed by other people?


Let's get off your totally irrelevant tanget about crimes committed by other people and get back to the child born in the US who has not committed any crime. Is the child born in the US somehow not born in the US? What does the 14th Amendment read?


Legal writer Edward Erler, in his 2015 Claremont Review piece, gets it wrong. The Founders didn't write the 14th Amendment and Erler doesn't get to say what the 14th Amendment "never intended".


... was not even involved in the adoption of the 14th Amendment.


The correct answer is that the executive order is unconstitutional because it violates the Constitution. There is no "pressure" involved.
Click to expand...
It does not violate any part of the Constitution.

Your word games won't work. RQAA
 
IBDaMann said:
Correct. Indians not taxed were not subject to US jurisdiction. That condition no longer exists. Per 1898 Supreme Court precedent (Wong Kim Ark) all children born in the US, regardless of the status of the parents, are US citizens, unless diplomatic jurisdiction is involved.
Click to expand...
Contextomy fallacy. Compositional error fallacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top