Birth Right Citizenship Will It Finally End?

Birthright / anchor babies

These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens​




'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns​


 
I forgot to add:

Luckily, Trump will nearly eliminate this problem by properly securing the border, but he realizes there will likely be another Libtard in charge again WAY down the road. If so, he/she/it will bust a big hole in the wall, like a complete moron. So, this fight needs to be litigated now, hopefully dispelling the There are tinnels under the wall. There are gps on the wall. People climb ove the wall un seconds.myth for good.
You will never learn. Tunnels are real. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/sophisticated-subterranean-tunnel-discovered-near-us-mexico-border You are such a sucker for right-wing lies. You are among the dumb ones. Most illegals fly in and stay ignoring their Visas.
 
Birthright / anchor babies

These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens​




'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns​


America would have gotten along just fine without those people and every other anchor baby too.

Go fuck yourself retard
 
The absurd interpretation of the 14th amendment is finally being challenged. The left loves to argue that it's clear the following Amendment somehow says that birth rights citizenship is clearly stated in our Constitution.

Section 1.All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Those words in bold are the ones that the left argue somehow translate to those who enter America ILLEGALLY and drop an infant on our soil should automatically be citizens. Section 1 was to leave no ambiguity about the rights for blacks to become citizens. The democrat activist SC Libtards had sided with Sanford in the case Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) in which the democrat appointed Chief Justice Roger B. Taney spewed typical drone drivel:
  1. That African Americans, free or enslaved, were not and could not be citizens of the United States under the Constitution, which meant they had no rights that white men were bound to respect.
  2. That the Missouri Compromise, which prohibited slavery in certain U.S. territories, was unconstitutional.
Republicans fighting racist policies didn't just start a few years ago. This also proves that the Supreme Court always fails America when it deviates from the true meaning of our brilliant Constitution. It's amazing how many things change yet stay the same.

I also love that last sentence, do the EPA rules and restrictions constitute due process? I don't think so, I'd like someone explain how it does. If the zealots with un-elected powers can and do make ridiculous rules that have severe impacts on ones private property rights, what real recourse does that property owners have? That's a bit off subject at the moment other than it points out how convoluted Libtard thinking is.
Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.
 
Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.
Why don't you archive your stupid mouth?
 
im not sure I agree with eliiminating birthright citizenship.
There was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.
the real move is to actually enforce the border, and eliminate even work visas.
It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.
creating a stateless underlass just makes more slaves for corporations to replace citizens with.
Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.
 
Birthright / anchor babies

These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens​


If so, he is deportable.

'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns​


That's exactly what it does. It is illegal alien mothers treating their own offspring as pawns to justify staying in the United States.
 
There was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.

It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.

Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.
no.

anchor babies have always been legal.

birthright citizenship is what we have always had.

you just a want a class of stateless slaves, fascist.
 
You will never learn. Tunnels are real. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/sophisticated-subterranean-tunnel-discovered-near-us-mexico-border You are such a sucker for right-wing lies. You are among the dumb ones. Most illegals fly in and stay ignoring their Visas.
So, thanks for the tunnel story, it was needed to straighten me out. I bet you felt pretty good, thinking you showed me. All of your Libtard buddies were likely cheering too. LOL I'm a little bit impressed that it's not from one of your usual Libtard sources, so there's that, bravo.

You could have done what most idiots would do and said, (use a Stallone voice here) "What about tunnels, dude??" said the moron "Can't they just use those, dumbass?" I'm cracking up just imagining you saying that.

Just to break it down real simple for you (read it very s...l...o...w...l...y, so you can understand) The comment 'they'll just blow a hole in the wall,' for those who don't need everything explained like they're in second grade - it's suggesting that some future dumbass President, like the one who just waddled out of the WH, might do exactly what Train ridin' Biden did in his first days in office, reverse every policy and directive to open the border up again. It shouldn't be a concern, because who would purposely want to put so many citizens at risk? But we are talking about Libtard drones that seem to be hellbent on destroying America, and their simpletons supporters like you. So, it's sadly must be planned for the realities of idiots in power.
 
There was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.

It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.

Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.
Not according to any SCOTUS decision regarding the Constitution
 
Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.
Well, I provided the many decisions from that era, showing how idiotic they were and proving the court was very much an activist court rather than simply ruling whether the case was supported by the Constitution or not. I suppose you might not agree and think that those rulings were just fine, after all, racism in the democrat party is still alive in well.

Common sense supports that the 14th Amendment was not written with pregnant illegal aliens giving birth then becoming citizens, in mind. In addition, allowing for every one of their extended families automatically becoming citizens just adds to the complete lunacy. Other Countries that people might actually consider moving to and living in don't allow this either. We'll just have to wait and see.
 
Well, I provided the many decisions from that era, showing how idiotic they were and proving the court was very much an activist court rather than simply ruling whether the case was supported by the Constitution or not. I suppose you might not agree and think that those rulings were just fine, after all, racism in the democrat party is still alive in well.

Common sense supports that the 14th Amendment was not written with pregnant illegal aliens giving birth then becoming citizens, in mind. In addition, allowing for every one of their extended families automatically becoming citizens just adds to the complete lunacy. Other Countries that people might actually consider moving to and living in don't allow this either. We'll just have to wait and see.
And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decision
 
And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decision
No shit, do you think the SC just starts making decisions when they're bored? LOL. The problem didn't exist until recently. And don't throw the 1898 case at me again, I've addressed that, and one little inconvenient detail about that case was that the little feller's parents were here LEGALLY.

So, that detail, along with the fact that the court was full of activists who didn't know that racist policies were not part of the Constitution, should be noted. Birthright citizenship became a real problem in the '90s when we all started talking about it. Those with common sense and compassion for the innocent, vulnerable Mexicans who were being exploited by the Cartels, and still are, thought we should do something about it.

Trump just happens to be the first President with the balls to challenge the absurd, evil, and misguided interpretation of the Amendment. So, hopefully, this court will actually stick to the known intent of the Amendment and do the right thing.
 
no.

anchor babies have always been legal.
Never were. You are ignoring the Constitution again.
birthright citizenship is what we have always had.
Nope. No part of the Constitution authorizes this and never did.
you just a want a class of stateless slaves, fascist.
More random words. Go learn English.

Babies aren't slaves, moron. They are under the same jurisdiction as their illegal alien parents. They are not stateless. They can be deported, just like the mother can be deported.

Redefinition fallacies (fascism<->capitalism, deportation<->slavery).
 
And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decision
That is true. And there have been no cases in over a century. Now it's being challenged, again.



The legal issue is why were the words AND SUBJECT TO added. Why is this an additional requirement? Why isn't just being born here ... Enough!?

"Section 1.All persons born ... in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, "
 
So, thanks for the tunnel story, it was needed to straighten me out. I bet you felt pretty good, thinking you showed me. All of your Libtard buddies were likely cheering too. LOL I'm a little bit impressed that it's not from one of your usual Libtard sources, so there's that, bravo.

You could have done what most idiots would do and said, (use a Stallone voice here) "What about tunnels, dude??" said the moron "Can't they just use those, dumbass?" I'm cracking up just imagining you saying that.

Just to break it down real simple for you (read it very s...l...o...w...l...y, so you can understand) The comment 'they'll just blow a hole in the wall,' for those who don't need everything explained like they're in second grade - it's suggesting that some future dumbass President, like the one who just waddled out of the WH, might do exactly what Train ridin' Biden did in his first days in office, reverse every policy and directive to open the border up again. It shouldn't be a concern, because who would purposely want to put so many citizens at risk? But we are talking about Libtard drones that seem to be hellbent on destroying America, and their simpletons supporters like you. So, it's sadly must be planned for the realities of idiots in power.
Tunneling activity can be detected and the tunnels destroyed. There is already equipment on the border to do just that.
 
Back
Top