You will never learn. Tunnels are real. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/sophisticated-subterranean-tunnel-discovered-near-us-mexico-border You are such a sucker for right-wing lies. You are among the dumb ones. Most illegals fly in and stay ignoring their Visas.I forgot to add:
Luckily, Trump will nearly eliminate this problem by properly securing the border, but he realizes there will likely be another Libtard in charge again WAY down the road. If so, he/she/it will bust a big hole in the wall, like a complete moron. So, this fight needs to be litigated now, hopefully dispelling the There are tinnels under the wall. There are gps on the wall. People climb ove the wall un seconds.myth for good.
America would have gotten along just fine without those people and every other anchor baby too.Birthright / anchor babies
These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens
These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens [Opinion]
Properly called birthright citizens, nicknamed “anchor babies” at times, people born in the U.S. to immigrant parents are Americans. Now, Donald Trump says he’s ending this Constitutional right that’s been a part of America for 150 years. Here’s a list of the Americans who are birthright citizens.www.yahoo.com
'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns
'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns
The idea that people give birth to stay in the US has no basis in reality – but expect to hear it more often as Trump seeks re-electionwww.theguardian.com
Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.The absurd interpretation of the 14th amendment is finally being challenged. The left loves to argue that it's clear the following Amendment somehow says that birth rights citizenship is clearly stated in our Constitution.
Section 1.All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Those words in bold are the ones that the left argue somehow translate to those who enter America ILLEGALLY and drop an infant on our soil should automatically be citizens. Section 1 was to leave no ambiguity about the rights for blacks to become citizens. The democrat activist SC Libtards had sided with Sanford in the case Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) in which the democrat appointed Chief Justice Roger B. Taney spewed typical drone drivel:
Republicans fighting racist policies didn't just start a few years ago. This also proves that the Supreme Court always fails America when it deviates from the true meaning of our brilliant Constitution. It's amazing how many things change yet stay the same.
- That African Americans, free or enslaved, were not and could not be citizens of the United States under the Constitution, which meant they had no rights that white men were bound to respect.
- That the Missouri Compromise, which prohibited slavery in certain U.S. territories, was unconstitutional.
I also love that last sentence, do the EPA rules and restrictions constitute due process? I don't think so, I'd like someone explain how it does. If the zealots with un-elected powers can and do make ridiculous rules that have severe impacts on ones private property rights, what real recourse does that property owners have? That's a bit off subject at the moment other than it points out how convoluted Libtard thinking is.
Why don't you archive your stupid mouth?Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.
Appears someone ^ can’t handle the truthWhy don't you archive your stupid mouth?
There was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.im not sure I agree with eliiminating birthright citizenship.
It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.the real move is to actually enforce the border, and eliminate even work visas.
Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.creating a stateless underlass just makes more slaves for corporations to replace citizens with.
If so, he is deportable.Birthright / anchor babies
These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens
These Amazing, Famous Americans Are All Birthright Citizens [Opinion]
Properly called birthright citizens, nicknamed “anchor babies” at times, people born in the U.S. to immigrant parents are Americans. Now, Donald Trump says he’s ending this Constitutional right that’s been a part of America for 150 years. Here’s a list of the Americans who are birthright citizens.www.yahoo.com
That's exactly what it does. It is illegal alien mothers treating their own offspring as pawns to justify staying in the United States.'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns
'Anchor babies': the 'ludicrous' immigration myth that treats people as pawns
The idea that people give birth to stay in the US has no basis in reality – but expect to hear it more often as Trump seeks re-electionwww.theguardian.com
no.There was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.
It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.
Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.
So, thanks for the tunnel story, it was needed to straighten me out. I bet you felt pretty good, thinking you showed me. All of your Libtard buddies were likely cheering too. LOL I'm a little bit impressed that it's not from one of your usual Libtard sources, so there's that, bravo.You will never learn. Tunnels are real. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/sophisticated-subterranean-tunnel-discovered-near-us-mexico-border You are such a sucker for right-wing lies. You are among the dumb ones. Most illegals fly in and stay ignoring their Visas.
Not according to any SCOTUS decision regarding the ConstitutionThere was never any right to citizenship to a child of an illegal alien in the United States simply because they were born within our borders. This practice of 'anchor babies' is itself ignoring the Constitution.
It is also to enforce the Constitution of the United States.
Nope. Such 'anchor babies' are deported too, along with their mother.
Well, I provided the many decisions from that era, showing how idiotic they were and proving the court was very much an activist court rather than simply ruling whether the case was supported by the Constitution or not. I suppose you might not agree and think that those rulings were just fine, after all, racism in the democrat party is still alive in well.Seeing birthright citizenship was confirmed in 1898, and no SCOTUS since then has ruled against it, Trump’s SCOTUS is really going to have to shit on established precedent on this one, but what the hell, they think Trump is infallible and immune, so I wouldn’t be surprised.
And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decisionWell, I provided the many decisions from that era, showing how idiotic they were and proving the court was very much an activist court rather than simply ruling whether the case was supported by the Constitution or not. I suppose you might not agree and think that those rulings were just fine, after all, racism in the democrat party is still alive in well.
Common sense supports that the 14th Amendment was not written with pregnant illegal aliens giving birth then becoming citizens, in mind. In addition, allowing for every one of their extended families automatically becoming citizens just adds to the complete lunacy. Other Countries that people might actually consider moving to and living in don't allow this either. We'll just have to wait and see.
No shit, do you think the SC just starts making decisions when they're bored? LOL. The problem didn't exist until recently. And don't throw the 1898 case at me again, I've addressed that, and one little inconvenient detail about that case was that the little feller's parents were here LEGALLY.And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decision
Never were. You are ignoring the Constitution again.no.
anchor babies have always been legal.
Nope. No part of the Constitution authorizes this and never did.birthright citizenship is what we have always had.
More random words. Go learn English.you just a want a class of stateless slaves, fascist.
That is true. And there have been no cases in over a century. Now it's being challenged, again.And there has no been a decision in over a century invalidating that decision
Tunneling activity can be detected and the tunnels destroyed. There is already equipment on the border to do just that.So, thanks for the tunnel story, it was needed to straighten me out. I bet you felt pretty good, thinking you showed me. All of your Libtard buddies were likely cheering too. LOL I'm a little bit impressed that it's not from one of your usual Libtard sources, so there's that, bravo.
You could have done what most idiots would do and said, (use a Stallone voice here) "What about tunnels, dude??" said the moron "Can't they just use those, dumbass?" I'm cracking up just imagining you saying that.
Just to break it down real simple for you (read it very s...l...o...w...l...y, so you can understand) The comment 'they'll just blow a hole in the wall,' for those who don't need everything explained like they're in second grade - it's suggesting that some future dumbass President, like the one who just waddled out of the WH, might do exactly what Train ridin' Biden did in his first days in office, reverse every policy and directive to open the border up again. It shouldn't be a concern, because who would purposely want to put so many citizens at risk? But we are talking about Libtard drones that seem to be hellbent on destroying America, and their simpletons supporters like you. So, it's sadly must be planned for the realities of idiots in power.
SCOTUS isn't the Constitution and has no authority over the Constitution.Not according to any SCOTUS decision regarding the Constitution