BLM Declares Looting "OK", Says It's "Reparations"

Well they are Marxists. So stealing other peoples belongings is OKAY!

I like your signature. Very thought-inspiring. Allow me to piggy-back ...


Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.

Marxism
Communism
Socialism
Progressivism
Democratic Socialism
Black Lives Matter/ANTIFA


Abortion
Pro-Choice
Women's rights
Reproductive/Women's Health
Late-Term or Post-Birth Doctor/Patient Decision





attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • The_Names_Have_Changed.jpg
    The_Names_Have_Changed.jpg
    108.9 KB · Views: 39
IBDaMann said:
Isn't it funny how that looks identical to not having been discriminated against in the first place?


Not if you're black.

Or Latino.

Or Asian.

Or Indian.

Or Middle Eastern.

Or Muslim.

Or Jewish.

Or LGBTQ+.

Or even a woman.

Doubt any of them would find that funny.
Oh, so suddenly it's all about them?

Nope. It's still hillarious how your insistence that people who have not been discriminated against nonetheless somehow have, in fact, been discriminated against ... but just haven't said anything.

That's worth emphasizing. Hillarious.
 
She's not good all the time. She's no better than most minorities who do not spend their time whining about being victims and do just fine without having a white savior.

Oy vey Flash, you don't realize what you're doing with these posts, do you?
 
Of course it is problematic. The problem is your huge leap of logic to claim that a woman trying to justify looting was any way related to my wife. .

YOU ARE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT YOUR "WIFE" INTO THIS, FLASH.

The reason you did it was because you were trying to draw a contrast between what you consider "good minorities" vs. "bad ones".

And you used your "wife" as a prop to do that.

What a piece of shit you are.

I hope your wife doesn't discover what you're doing here because she'll be pretty pissed.
 
Of course it is problematic. The problem is your huge leap of logic to claim that a woman trying to justify looting was any way related to my wife.

The even more problematic response was your claim that because I don't justify looting I am not empathetic. If you are empathetic to theft you are very misguided. Showing everyone your liberal credentials does not mean you have to agree with anything a black person says.

You said earlier that you took issue with her economics:

I notice you made no attempt to defend her economics which is what my post was about.

However, your post wasn't about her economics...it was about your attempt to dismiss her economics because you were uncomfortable by them:

She said she learned her economics at PUSH? That explains her confusion.

So then I asked you, point blank, what of her economics did you find objectionable, and you couldn't articulate a single fucking thing:

You disagree with the economic fact that black people were brought here to work -for free- for white people, literally building this country as those white people made all the rules?

And then again here:

What about her economic explanations did you find objectionable? You never said. You just screeched about PUSH, which leads me to think you didn't watch the video because you got triggered

So what happened Flash, was that you watched part of a video, got triggered by the mention of PUSH, completely shut yourself down, refused to engage in a good faith debate about what it was about "the economics" of that video you found objectionable, then you went and invoked your "wife" while saying she faces discrimination and prejudice while also not being a victim of it.
 
She's not good all the time. She's no better than most minorities who do not spend their time whining about being victims and do just fine without having a white savior.

Sounds to me like you think you're her white savior.
 
I took that cognitive test. I didn't recognize that elephant, either.

You only take that test if they suspect you have early-onset dementia or a severe brain injury.

So the reason you took that test was because someone thought you were brain damaged. They met you. Listened to you. Heard what you had to say. Then decided you were too fucking weird to think like this, and that something had to be wrong with your brain.
 
Nope. It's still hillarious how your insistence that people who have not been discriminated against nonetheless somehow have, in fact, been discriminated against ... but just haven't said anything.

So this is exactly like the Conservative reaction to Me Too...why did these women wait so long to come forward?

Probably because they didn't feel safe doing so thanks to people like you who dismiss their grievances because it's uncomfortable or inconvenient for you.
 
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT YOUR "WIFE" INTO THIS, FLASH.

The reason you did it was because you were trying to draw a contrast between what you consider "good minorities" vs. "bad ones".

And you used your "wife" as a prop to do that.

What a piece of shit you are.

I hope your wife doesn't discover what you're doing here because she'll be pretty pissed.

You are the one who considers some minorities as bad by showing a video of a woman who justifies looting. Since I don't think most minorities have such an immoral attitude or loot I think they are almost all good. Kind of simplistic of you to divide minorities into good and bad and always stick "black" in your description of the woman on the video. Do you only think of people in terms of their race? Why didn't you just call her the woman on the video? We could all see what color she was.
 
She knows more than you because she's lived the experience as a black woman, and you've lived your experience as a privileged white man.

You are only capable of looking at things through your narrow, myopic perspective because you lack basic human qualities like empathy.

You will never understand her because you choose not to. That's not on her, that's on you. Grow the fuck up.

So it's ok to loot?
 
You only take that test if they suspect you have early-onset dementia or a severe brain injury.

So the reason you took that test was because someone thought you were brain damaged. They met you. Listened to you. Heard what you had to say. Then decided you were too fucking weird to think like this, and that something had to be wrong with your brain.

LV426 has no sense of humor and cannot recognize sarcasm. He is too busy being angry at others because they dare have different political opinions. He wants to force conformity on society and will stay angry until it happens.
 
You are the one who considers some minorities as bad by showing a video of a woman who justifies looting.

Is she justifying looting, or is she airing her grievances at an economic system that causes looting?

It's the latter, isn't it?

Now why would she think that an economic system that has subjugated black people, stolen their wages, stolen their work, usurped their voice and those of other minorities for 400 years would prompt people to loot?

You're lucky black people want equity and not revenge.
 
You are the one who considers some minorities as bad by showing a video of a woman who justifies looting. Since I don't think most minorities have such an immoral attitude or loot I think they are almost all good. Kind of simplistic of you to divide minorities into good and bad and always stick "black" in your description of the woman on the video. Do you only think of people in terms of their race? Why didn't you just call her the woman on the video? We could all see what color she was.

Oh course! These people only see race. Black good, white bad. Their approach is my life is in the toilet and it's because of white privilege and slavery. Its a very simple and responsibility free way of living life. Its thuggery, break shit until they give you what you want.
 
Kind of simplistic of you to divide minorities into good and bad and always stick "black" in your description of the woman on the video

You're the one who is doing that dividing, Flash. You literally did it in this thread when you said your wife was "one of the good ones", but not "all of the time".

So what standard are you using to make that determination?
 
Do you only think of people in terms of their race?

Someone's race is a defining characteristic of who they are.

If you say you are colorblind, what you're saying is that you think there's something wrong with the color of someone's skin.

If you weren't colorblind, you could acknowledge someone's race and all the baggage that goes with it.

Someone's skin color is an intrinsic part of who they are...so by erasing that, you're erasing part of someone's identity.

That's pretty fucking shitty, Flash. And extremely fucking racist because it implies someone's skin color is a problem.

So why do you think someone's skin color is a problem that you overcome by being "blind" to it?
 
Back
Top