WTF Flash, if you didn't see her as a victim then why did you say she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice earlier in this thread?!!?!?
Yeesh. You might need to take that cognitive test Trump took.
BLM Declares Looting "OK", Says It's "Reparations"
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
WTF Flash, if you didn't see her as a victim then why did you say she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice earlier in this thread?!!?!?
Yeesh. You might need to take that cognitive test Trump took.
Sailor is cradle-to-grave government dependency.
Born in a state hospital.
Educated in public schools.
Couldn't get into college or a real job, so you joined the Navy.
Received decades of government-provided benefits like housing, food, training, employment.
Retires on government pension.
Will die in a state hospital.
Funeral costs covered by taxpayers.
CRADLE. TO. GRAVE.
Welfare moocher.
No, it had nothing to do with the woman in the video. It was in reference to your attack on empathy falsely implying that if you accuse others of having no empathy it therefore means you do have empathy.
Try to keep up.
So you would say she's "one of the good ones"?
Of course it did!
There was no reason to invoke this fake wife at all...you could have debated the merits of the argument made in the video, but you didn't. You CHOSE NOT TO. You always seem to make the worst possible choices. How? I really can't fathom it.
Instead, you invoked your own wife's experiences as some sort of counter-argument to the points made in the video about white supremacy and this nation.
You even went further with it to say your wife is one of the good ones...unlike the woman in the video? Isn't that what you were saying? That your wife is somehow better because she doesn't dwell on institutional racism? Do you not see how that is problematic?
I have news for you...your wife probably doesn't tell you a lot of things about herself because she knows if she does, you won't listen to her and will instead tell her how she's wrong.
I feel like Chidi in The Good Place right now.
Observing someone's experience isn't empathizing with them, Flash.
Read LV, Read. I never said she was a victim of discrimination and prejudice. I said I have seen her face prejudice and discrimination and it was very hurtful for my to see it.
If somebody does not like me and does not choose me for the team, job, etc. I don't see myself as a victim of their prejudice toward me.
I was not hired for jobs and told it was hard to hire white males because they were seeking to hire more women and minorities. I did not see myself as a victim or discriminated against--I viewed it as simply a hiring choice.
Neither is accusing others of having no empathy. That does not mean you have any empathy toward anyone. We already know you want to deprive people of 1st Amendment rights if you disagree with their politics.
Lack of tolerance of others shows the inability to empathize.
Like Hitlery would have done any better? If she was pres we'd probably have over 1M dead, since she'd never implement a travel ban. Cuz dat rayssis.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Welp when I helped hire Anesthesia residents each year we frequently jumped over much more highly ranked and qualified graduating medical students and selected lower ranked and low qualified graduating medical students for the job of Anesthesia residents. We preferentially hired females and some racial groups.The hospital had government contracts and accepted Medicare so we needed to keep our numbers up. I find in general people are more interested in having the most qualified doctor work on them than they are in race. Now we did have the occasional highly qualified minority candidate too so naturally we jumped at the chance to hire them. I know you will scream false story! But I know its true and that is all that is really important to me.
"INSTITUTIONAL RACISM"....
The woman in the video was trying to justify looting. I don't need to invoke my wife or anything else to illustrate how lame that is.
She should be ashamed to denigrate black people by suggesting they cannot have the "things they want" without theft. Grabbing random items off a shelf is hardly the things most blacks want and it insults all the hard working black people who do not resort to looting to survive.
You obviously have no empathy for all those blacks that do not resort to such behavior.
Of course it is problematic. The problem is your huge leap of logic to claim that a woman trying to justify looting was any way related to my wife.
The even more problematic response was your claim that because I don't justify looting I am not empathetic. If you are empathetic to theft you are very misguided. Showing everyone your liberal credentials does not mean you have to agree with anything a black person says.
Last edited:
I would say she is a strong person who does not let a roadblock deter her from what she wants just because somebody is prejudiced or discriminates against her. She was always able to find good positions and then when she developed a good reputation it was easy for her to get a job.
I served as chair or a member of many hiring committees over forty years. One thing I learned is that there is no "best person" for the job. Sometimes every committee member voted for a different candidate. Also, we sometimes passed over more highly qualified or experienced individuals because we did not think they would take a job with our institution because they could get more money somewhere else. We would be wasting one of our choices to interview a candidate who would never take the job.
Sometimes that person we passed over might be a minority, but there was no discrimination based on race. In fact, it made them more valuable and more sought after by other schools. We would have loved to have hired them, but we knew there was little chance.
She's not good all the time. She's no better than most minorities who do not spend their time whining about being victims and do just fine without having a white savior.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Well we knew how bad they wanted our particular job because they all participated in the "Match" for Residents. So what you are saying doesn't really apply with the selection in the "Match" its a part of the selection of programs for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The applicant lists his desired programs in descending order and programs list the residents that they are interested in having in their program in descending order. Then there is a computer algorithm that matches the programs to the resident. We frequently stepped over people that had higher academic and community accomplishments to select minorities preferentially. The Student will be offered their one best match only. When they participated in the Match they were obligated to take the program the algorithm selected for them.
Here is an example of what I am talking about. To get into Med School with a MCAT score of 24-26 and a GPA of 3.20-3.39 if you are white you had a 8.2% chance of being admitted to med school. If you are Hispanic you had a 30.9% chance and if you are black you had a 58.7% chance. The same type of thing happens in Residency programs.
My former business partner's mom was born in Mexico to Spanish parents (from Spain) his father was white. He was considered to be Hispanic. He did not look it. He got a interview offer from Harvard Medical School. Our Medical School in Texas gave him a 4 year scholarship because he was "Hispanic". He didn't interview with Harvard because he was a petroleum geologist and was doing oil exploration deals on the side while he went to Med School. So he wanted to live in Texas while he went to Med School.
Last edited:
ya. but the BLM freaks will not condemn such remarks
Blacks can be talked down at, and used as pawns for the Maoists -and the white SJW never say a word
There will always be some that try to justify anything. And others will support them because they are afraid they will be called racist if they dare disagree.
