BLM Declares Looting "OK", Says It's "Reparations"

Flash said:
I don't think white supremacy explains discrimination by blacks.
Click to expand...

I was wondering how long it would take before you started playing the victim card.

When black people have 400 years of subjugating another race and then crafting all laws and society around that racist premise, then you might have a point.

Reverse racism isn't a thing.
 
LV426 said:
I was wondering how long it would take before you started playing the victim card.

When black people have 400 years of subjugating another race and then crafting all laws and society around that racist premise, then you might have a point.

Reverse racism isn't a thing.
Click to expand...

BLACK PEOPLE AREN'T THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN ENSLAVED; THEY JUST DWELL ON IT LONGER...
 
Flash said:
As usual, you make a debate about your intense hostility and personal insults rather than the issues involved.
Click to expand...

OK, so what happened in this thread was that I posted a video of a woman explaining the anger that resulted in mass protests against an institutionally racist system. Protests that did include looting and destruction.

You watched some -but not all- of the video, got triggered at the mention of PUSH, and completely shut yourself down after that.

Then, you invoked your "wife" (that I'm not convinced is real) and the discrimination she faces that somehow, someway means you understand what she faces more than the black woman in the video understands and reflects on what she faces herself.

Then, I called you out on that and you backed away from it, saying you weren't speaking for your wife, even though that is exactly what you were doing. Usurping whatever experiences she had as some sort of second-hand badge of honor for you. So you made everything your wife faces about you. That's what you did when you invoked her in this thread. That because your wife faces discrimination, that means you completely and totally understand that discrimination she faces because you -GASP- saw it!

Well, I see discrimination all the time too, but the difference between us is that I give those discriminated against the platform to air their grievances, whereas you rob them of that platform to posture their grievances as yours.

That's fucking shitty and if my spouse did that to me, I'd fucking divorce them for it.
 
ExpressLane said:
Nope some companies jump over qualified people and promoted people just because of the color of their skin. You can't solve racism by using racism.
Click to expand...

Nonsense of course, because you aren't in the room when hiring decisions are made, have never been in that room, and will never be in that room.

So it's easier for you to excuse away your own personal inadequacies by pretending that you didn't get the job because of race, when the reality is you didn't get the job because you weren't qualified for it, even if you think you were.

You don't get to hire yourself. Unless you're Dick Cheney.
 
LV426 said:
Then you don't know shit, Flash.
Click to expand...

You obviously have a very limited view of the world and prejudice and discrimination if you think it is all related to white supremacy. It is a much more entrenched problem than you realize.
 
Flash said:
You obviously have a very limited view of the world and prejudice and discrimination if you think it is all related to white supremacy.
Click to expand...

Ummm, it is related to white supremacy, and that was the theme of the video you didn't watch or take anything of substance away from.


It is a much more entrenched problem than you realize.
Click to expand...

Interested to know what it is you think is an "entrenched problem" that I'm missing?

Are you going to argue you're the victim of reverse racism, or something?
 
Flash said:
I already know why there is prejudice and discrimination and it exists throughout the world often unrelated to white supremacy. I don't think white supremacy explains discrimination by blacks.

As usual, you make a debate about your intense hostility and personal insults rather than the issues involved.
Click to expand...

SHOCKING!

WHITE GUY THINKS WHITE SUPREMACY ISN'T RELATED TO PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION.

I also notice how you moved the goalposts from the United States to "the world".

That's your BoThSiDeS showing.
 
LV426 said:
Nonsense of course, because you aren't in the room when hiring decisions are made, have never been in that room, and will never be in that room.
Click to expand...
You don't know what hiring decisions I have made.


So it's easier for you to excuse away your own personal inadequacies by pretending that you didn't get the job because of race, when the reality is you didn't get the job because you weren't qualified for it, even if you think you were.

You don't get to hire yourself. Unless you're Dick Cheney.
Click to expand...
I never said I didn't get the job. I have never interviewed for a job that I did not get. I have been in the room that decided if others got the job many times. Some of those times we jumped over more qualified people for lesser qualified people based on their race alone. Personally I believe in a level playing field. The most qualified person should always get the job.
 
LV426 said:
OK, so what happened in this thread was that I posted a video of a woman explaining the anger that resulted in mass protests against an institutionally racist system. Protests that did include looting and destruction.

You watched some -but not all- of the video, got triggered at the mention of PUSH, and completely shut yourself down after that.

Then, you invoked your "wife" (that I'm not convinced is real) and the discrimination she faces that somehow, someway means you understand what she faces more than the black woman in the video understands and reflects on what she faces herself.

Then, I called you out on that and you backed away from it, saying you weren't speaking for your wife, even though that is exactly what you were doing. Usurping whatever experiences she had as some sort of second-hand badge of honor for you. So you made everything your wife faces about you. That's what you did when you invoked her in this thread. That because your wife faces discrimination, that means you completely and totally understand that discrimination she faces because you -GASP- saw it!

Well, I see discrimination all the time too, but the difference between us is that I give those discriminated against the platform to air their grievances, whereas you rob them of that platform to posture their grievances as yours.

That's fucking shitty and if my spouse did that to me, I'd fucking divorce them for it.
Click to expand...

As usual, you make erroneous assumptions and can't get the story straight. I watched the entire video of the woman attempting to justify looting. It wasn't Push but her distorted economic explanations that caused my response. My response was only about the woman's economics and did not mention race.

Then, I get the usual personal attacks from you accusing me of having no empathy. My response about my wife was to illustrate that others actually experience issues you just pretend to know about. Acknowledging your privileged position does not mean you understand those problems---to you they are just talking points in partisan rhetoric.

I never backed away from anything because I was never speaking for my wife or her feelings (another example of reading comprehension or knee-jerk conclusions). I just mentioned what I have personally observed. I never felt that was any kind of second hand badge of honor--that is liberal guilt mentality.

Sometimes I wish my wife is not real, also, but I'll keep her. Just kidding--she is the strongest person I know.
 
ExpressLane said:
I never said I didn't get the job. I have never interviewed for a job that I did not get. I have been in the room that decided if others got the job many times. Some of those times we jumped over more qualified people for lesser qualified people based on their race alone. Personally I believe in a level playing field. The most qualified person should always get the job.
Click to expand...

Sure Jan.
 
"Reparations" is the Punchline

Grokmaster said:
And THUG LIVES MATTER continue to destroy any credibility they ever had (if any), declaring LOOTING "OK" CALLING IT "REPARATIONS", AFTER CONTINUED LOOTING IN CHICAGO.
Click to expand...

I hope I'm not the only one who caught the joke ...

BLM is 70% Caucasian. The looting is "reparations" ... obviously for all the past wars throughout Europe resulting from Marxism.

.
 
Flash said:
As usual, you make erroneous assumptions and can't get the story straight. I watched the entire video of the woman attempting to justify looting. It wasn't Push but her distorted economic explanations that caused my response. My response was only about the woman's economics and did not mention race.
Click to expand...

What about her economic explanations did you find objectionable? You never said. You just screeched about PUSH, which leads me to think you didn't watch the video because you got triggered.

If she said she learned it at the Chicago School for Economics, would you have a different opinion? Because guess what? Everything she said is taught at the Griffin School of Economics at UChicago.
 
Grajonca said:
.
BLM are just a bunch of Marxist cunts masquerading as a legitimate organisation. MLK must be turning in his grave.
Click to expand...

So is Antifa.

Both are domestic terrorist groups. Both are racist. Both are just criminal thugs. Both are supported and funded by the Democrat Party.
 
Flash said:
I never backed away from anything because I was never speaking for my wife or her feelings (another example of reading comprehension or knee-jerk conclusions). I just mentioned what I have personally observed. I never felt that was any kind of second hand badge of honor--that is liberal guilt mentality.
Click to expand...

See, why would you invoke it then? That's the part that is tripping me up. I don't understand why you thought it was necessary for you to impose your white male view of someone else's experience. You robbed her of that platform. She might surprise you and end up offering a perspective on the discrimination she faces...but I doubt you'd ever have that discussion with her without trying to explain to her why she's wrong in what she feels or believes.

You think she's honest with you, but she's definitely not.

Most people who are discriminated against rarely confront those who enable that discrimination.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top