When boosters say "I will pay to hire Urban Meyer" they aren't saying "I will pay to hire Urban Meyer or just take the money and do whatever you want with it". It's "you take the money to hire Urban Meyer or I'm not giving you this money."
It wasn't a money issue. In fact it was shown keeping Helton would cost the University money. I guess I'm going to have to keep writing that over and over or until we tire of the discussion.
You don't see a danger in an alumni dictating to a University who they should hire to do what? Suppose next month that same alumni wants an unqualified brother in law to head the economics graduate program? That type of practice threatens the school's integrity
I am not getting tired of the discussion, although I see I'm never going to get you to think that perhaps USC's top five days are behind them, besides, beats exchanging personal insults with the trolls