The likelihood that such a wait would happen to another as well is very high. (1) Such a wait would be unheard of here, for those with insurance. (2)
(1) Evidence?
(2) Complete myth.
The likelihood that such a wait would happen to another as well is very high. (1) Such a wait would be unheard of here, for those with insurance. (2)
Yeah, I know.
I have lost someone due to a mistake in a hospital here, by a NYU Neurosurgeon no less.
Bad things happen everywhere. Mistakes happen everywhere. One experience is not reflective of an entire system, but you can't get that through and I have given up on that, I don't care.
Enough Americans understand our system is broken and it doesn't matter what is going on in the UK or Canada, our system is broken, period.
Change is going to come here. Finally. And that is what matters, really.
It is not a "complete myth" unless you ignore that it happened.(1) Evidence?
(2) Complete myth.
Exactly. If we were going to set up the NHS from scratch we'd probably do it differently, it would be more efficient, there would be no waiting for anything and they'd even give you a lift back to your house in an ambulance and let you work the siren.
Could it work better, yes. Should it work better, yes. Will it work better in future, yes.
I wouldn't dream of telling Americans which system to adopt, that's a matter for you. I would rather live in a country with universal healthcare (well, excluding dentists...*shudder*) than without and i reckon quite a lot of you would as well.
Exactly. Hence my reasoning that we look at what is good, and what we can consider as problems elsewhere, then adopt an entirely different system that hopefully with address the problems and keep the good.Exactly. If we were going to set up the NHS from scratch we'd probably do it differently, it would be more efficient, there would be no waiting for anything and they'd even give you a lift back to your house in an ambulance and let you work the siren.
Could it work better, yes. Should it work better, yes. Will it work better in future, yes.
I wouldn't dream of telling Americans which system to adopt, that's a matter for you. I would rather live in a country with universal healthcare (well, excluding dentists...*shudder*) than without and i reckon quite a lot of you would as well.
Earlier in the thread I said that was one of the systems we should take a serious gander at.I haven't heard anyone complain about the French system.
Exactly. Hence my reasoning that we look at what is good, and what we can consider as problems elsewhere, then adopt an entirely different system that hopefully with address the problems and keep the good.
Of course, it won't be perfect and changes will likely need to be made, but why reproduce problems that can easily be foreseen by simply learning from others?
The idea that we must believe that everybody else is perfect and ignore any issues whatsoever and then say "myth" about them is preposterous.
What is preposterous is you are assuming my opinion, as you had objection to the same earlier in another thread you may recognize the sentiment.Here's the problem. No one has ever had that "idea", other than you and others like you, setting up this non-existent "Idea" in order to knock it down.
The "idea" is that the right wing and powerful lobbyists, have done absolutely nothing but exaggerate and outright lie about problems with universal systems in other countries, to foster fear here, so that we are stuck with a broken system, which is, not to put too fine a point on it, killing people every day.
What is "preposterous' is that you pretend that hasn't happened, and isn't happening right now. that's what is preposterous.
What is preposterous is you are assuming my opinion, as you had objection to the same earlier in another thread you may recognize the sentiment.
I propose researching and adopting the best, you prefer adopting anything at all and pretending that there are no problems, at least that is what it appears you prefer by your objection to my assertions that we should learn from other programs elsewhere.
Likely it is to leave the states to adopt the programs they think are best for their state. Which is close to my opinion. I'd prefer to allow states to create programs that they think are good, then later evaluating and taking the best of the best and copying it elsewhere.What's Ron Paul's plan for healthcare?
What is preposterous is you are assuming my opinion, as you had objection to the same earlier in another thread you may recognize the sentiment.
I propose researching and adopting the best, you prefer adopting anything at all and pretending that there are no problems, at least that is what it appears you prefer by your objection to my assertions that we should learn from other programs elsewhere.
What's Ron Paul's plan for healthcare?
Likely it is to leave the states to adopt the programs they think are best for their state. Which is close to my opinion. I'd prefer to allow states to create programs that they think are good, then later evaluating and taking the best of the best and copying it elsewhere.
Which doesn't mean that he has no real objective in fixing the problem. Creating coverage doesn't necessarily mean it must be handled only at the Federal level.Thanks.
So he has no national healthcare plan.
Fat people have it coming.
I think it's a winner!
*sigh*Ha! Exactly!
You know exactly what the Libertarian postion is on healthcare: reduce taxes, regulations, and let the free market decide.