Bush Admin. Cleared-Again

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You're such a frustrated little child...so much so that you spend time sending me similar BS in the rating messages!

Bottom line: neither you or PMP can refute the 3 posts I put forth....and since new conservatives (neocons, for short) are defined by the best dictionaries in the country, all I do is just point out the blatherings of you and your cohorts that fit the bill. You can deny it, but you can't logically refute it. TFB for you.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Not frustrated, and not a neocon. Say goodnight Gracie, you're done!
Click to expand...

See folks, this fool doesn't even have enough creativity to make a decent retort...he plagiarizes one of my favorite sayings. When Southie cannot debate the issue to his favor, he just goes on the personal attack or creates a new question that he claims is the real issue! :palm: A Rovian tactic that the neocons just don't realize the rest of the world is hip to.

You may have the last, useless word Southie...God knows you don't have the guts or the brains to debate me honestly and rationally. See ya next thread.
 
bravo said:
Thats cool ....link me up ...I'd like to see one. I've seen him get his ass kicked over and over, but never win one...

Given the number of times I've reduced you to a squawking neocon parrot, it's no wonder that an intellectually impotent joker like you would state this.

Be that as it may...just think....Obama in his first year is responsible for 4700 Iraqi deaths all by himself, and the war is over for all practical purposes......with more deaths to come.
Click to expand...

Here's a thought.....try staying on target and then try to disprove what Christie schooled the Post Modern Fool on. Because if you can't logically and factually disprove what she brought forth or what I linked, then you're just blowing smoke.

And who said the "war" was over?? You mean the "war on terror"? When did that happen? The "war against Afghanistan"? Funny, one was never officially declared! And are you negatively criticizing Obama for continuing the Shrub's policy? Because that's what folk like me, Christie and other "libs" have been doing, dont'cha know?

Carry on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Here's a thought.....try staying on target and then try to disprove what Christie schooled the Post Modern Fool on. Because if you can't logically and factually disprove what she brought forth or what I linked, then you're just blowing smoke.

And who said the "war" was over?? You mean the "war on terror"? When did that happen? The "war against Afghanistan"? Funny, one was never officially declared! And are you negatively criticizing Obama for continuing the Shrub's policy? Because that's what folk like me, Christie and other "libs" have been doing, dont'cha know?

Carry on.
Click to expand...

You mean the "war on terror"?
The "war against Afghanistan"?

If you understood the thread, Christie was referring to the War in Iraq...but then you'd have to be able to read....

Funny, one was never officially declared!

How about that....brings back memories of North Korea and Vietnam

I can't criticize Obama ...if I did, I'd be accused of being a racist....just pointing out that he is responsible for the deaths of 4700+ Iraqis in 2009.:cof1:
 
Taichiliberal said:
Here's a thought.....try staying on target and then try to disprove what Christie schooled the Post Modern Fool on. Because if you can't logically and factually disprove what she brought forth or what I linked, then you're just blowing smoke.
Click to expand...

Delusion.jpg
 
Taichiliberal said:
See folks, this fool doesn't even have enough creativity to make a decent retort...he plagiarizes one of my favorite sayings. When Southie cannot debate the issue to his favor, he just goes on the personal attack or creates a new question that he claims is the real issue! :palm: A Rovian tactic that the neocons just don't realize the rest of the world is hip to.

You may have the last, useless word Southie...God knows you don't have the guts or the brains to debate me honestly and rationally. See ya next thread.
Click to expand...

You're the one who's run away from honest debate. I've been waiting months for you to explain your neocon and racist accusations. :)
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why give "estimates" when the actual data is right in front of you....count them up....somewhere around 90k were killed by Iraqi terrorists, around 10k by collateral damage, none by intentional action by coalition forces......


yes, I do....because it does support my position.....if you had actually looked at it you would know that it supports my position....



you have to throw that in to avoid the truth.......obviously they aren't the facts......that's the unfounded opinion of a liberal spinster.....
however, you forgot to include that spin factor in your initial claim.....it's why you are a liar
Click to expand...

"...around 10K by collateral damage..."

Despicable.

Iraqi mothers, fathers, grandparents, children, embryos, dead as the result of our invasion and you dismiss these thousands upon thousands of lives with the term "collateral damage". It's clear you have no compassion, no understanding, no honor and no shame.

Just go back to protesting abortion. You've dishonored the dead and you're not fit to comment on them.
 
bravo said:
Thats cool ....link me up ...I'd like to see one. I've seen him get his ass kicked over and over, but never win one...

Be that as it may...just think....Obama in his first year is responsible for 4700 Iraqi deaths all by himself, and the war is over for all practical purposes......with more deaths to come.
Click to expand...

I don't expect you to acknowledge that any liberal wins arguments.

According to pmp, bush wasn't responsible for all the deaths from the invasion, it was just "Iraqi terrorism", so using his logic, Obama isn't responsible either.

See how that works?
 
christiefan915 said:
"...around 10K by collateral damage..."

Despicable.

Iraqi mothers, fathers, grandparents, children, embryos, dead as the result of our invasion and you dismiss these thousands upon thousands of lives with the term "collateral damage". It's clear you have no compassion, no understanding, no honor and no shame.

Just go back to protesting abortion. You've dishonored the dead and you're not fit to comment on them.
Click to expand...

and you've dishonored the truth....if liberals weren't so prone to lying and hyperbole people might actually pay some attention to them.....you certainly don't convince people to pay attention to your arguments by lying to them.....
 
christiefan915 said:
I don't expect you to acknowledge that any liberal wins arguments.

According to pmp, bush wasn't responsible for all the deaths from the invasion, it was just "Iraqi terrorism", so using his logic, Obama isn't responsible either.

See how that works?
Click to expand...

if you weren't a mentally challenged liberal you would have noticed that was precisely the approach bravo was using on you.....apparently though, it you didn't quite get it in time....
 
christiefan915 said:
I don't expect you to acknowledge that any liberal wins arguments.

According to pmp, bush wasn't responsible for all the deaths from the invasion, it was just "Iraqi terrorism", so using his logic, Obama isn't responsible either.

See how that works?
Click to expand...

And here I was trying to use YOUR logic....so which is it going to be?

Yours for Bush and his for Obama ? Or are we gonna be consistent ?....
 
bravo said:
You mean the "war on terror"?
The "war against Afghanistan"?

If you understood the thread, Christie was referring to the War in Iraq...but then you'd have to be able to read....

:palm: Moron, I'm asking you whether it was the war on terror or Afghanistan, as you said it's "over". We're STILL occupying Iraq, dummy. Resistence to the gov't is STILL going on, and the various factions are STILL killing each other....or don't you read the papers? The "war" in Iraq was NEVER OFFICIALLY DECLARED BY CONGRESS, nor was it condoned by the UN charter that we signed, nor was the criteria by Congress met for hostilities/occupation to occur. And you can't declare "war" on a military concept...so WTF are you talking about?

Funny, one was never officially declared!

How about that....brings back memories of North Korea and Vietnam

So to paraphrase an old saying, "three wrongs make a right" in your intellectually impotent mind?

I can't criticize Obama ...if I did, I'd be accused of being a racist....just pointing out that he is responsible for the deaths of 4700+ Iraqis in 2009.:cof1:
Click to expand...

Translation: This dummy can't lie about Obama because he can't stand being proved wrong with facts and logic.....so he tries to make a dig by trying to insinuate that critics of the Shrub are not critical of Obama. As I and others have stated, Obama IS getting public criticisms for continuing the Shrub's dismal policies. Note that this clown won't acknowledge that or the FACT that Obama is continuing a failed policy of the Shrub that he and his fellow parrots refused to condemn....yet here he is NOT giving Obama credit for doing what they initially said was golden. Ahhh, the convoluted mind of the neocon.

"Bravo" indeed. ;)
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if you weren't a mentally challenged liberal you would have noticed that was precisely the approach bravo was using on you.....apparently though, it you didn't quite get it in time....
Click to expand...

Oh, my bad. I forgot that idiots like you and bravo are impervious to irony, and that I have to spell everything out for you. Is this better?

<sarcasm> According to pmp, bush wasn't responsible for all the deaths from the invasion, it was just "Iraqi terrorism", so using his logic, Obama isn't responsible either.

See how that works? </sarcasm>

Anybody who's read my posts, though apparently not you, knows that I criticized Obama and put my criticism in writing to him the very day his Afghanistan decision was announced. He sent more troops. He put more troops in harm's way. He is responsible for the outcome, just as bush is responsible for the deaths of +/- 100,000 Iraqi civilians and 4,400 American troops.

I'm not afraid to acknowledge the mistakes I believe Obama is making. You and bravo could learn a lot from me.
 
bravo said:
And here I was trying to use YOUR logic....so which is it going to be?

Yours for Bush and his for Obama ? Or are we gonna be consistent ?....
Click to expand...

Post #253.

Oh, my bad. I forgot that idiots like you and bravo are impervious to irony, and that I have to spell everything out for you. Is this better?

<sarcasm> According to pmp, bush wasn't responsible for all the deaths from the invasion, it was just "Iraqi terrorism", so using his logic, Obama isn't responsible either.

See how that works? </sarcasm>

Anybody who's read my posts, though apparently not you, knows that I criticized Obama and put my criticism in writing to him the very day his Afghanistan decision was announced. He sent more troops. He put more troops in harm's way. He is responsible for the outcome, just as bush is responsible for the deaths of +/- 100,000 Iraqi civilians and 4,400 American troops.

I'm not afraid to acknowledge the mistakes I believe Obama is making. You and bravo could learn a lot from me.
 
Originally Posted by bravo View Post
You mean the "war on terror"?
The "war against Afghanistan"?

If you understood the thread, Christie was referring to the War in Iraq...but then you'd have to be able to read....
Click to expand...

Moron, I'm asking you whether it was the war on terror or Afghanistan, as you said it's "over". We're STILL occupying Iraq, dummy. Resistence to the gov't is STILL going on, and the various factions are STILL killing each other....or don't you read the papers? The "war" in Iraq was NEVER OFFICIALLY DECLARED BY CONGRESS, nor was it condoned by the UN charter that we signed, nor was the criteria by Congress met for hostilities/occupation to occur. And you can't declare "war" on a military concept...so WTF are you talking about?



I know you're asking me...thats why I pointed out to you (idiot with little reading comprehension) that the subject was the Iraqi War...are you still confused ?..........Yeah, the "war" in Iraq has been over for quite some time and the occupation continues....
We know it was never 'officially declared' .... I've all ready commented on that....so you're repeating yourself for nothing....
And, as a sovereign country, we really don't give a shit what the UN has to say about how we choose to defend ourselves....("we" being US patriots)



"nor was the criteria by Congress met for hostilities/occupation to occur." ???

You're obviously not familiar with the "Iraq War Resolution" either....simply put:

The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."

WTF are you talking about?

Funny, one was never officially declared!

How about that....brings back memories of North Korea and Vietnam
Click to expand...



So to paraphrase an old saying, "three wrongs make a right" in your intellectually impotent mind?

Actually, its two wrongs that make a right..and understandable mistake for one with a lower IQ such as yourself.......is English not your native language?

I can't criticize Obama ...if I did, I'd be accused of being a racist....just pointing out that he is responsible for the deaths of 4700+ Iraqis in 2009.
Click to expand...

Carry on, Clara
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
Moron, I'm asking you whether it was the war on terror or Afghanistan, as you said it's "over". We're STILL occupying Iraq, dummy. Resistence to the gov't is STILL going on, and the various factions are STILL killing each other....or don't you read the papers? The "war" in Iraq was NEVER OFFICIALLY DECLARED BY CONGRESS, nor was it condoned by the UN charter that we signed, nor was the criteria by Congress met for hostilities/occupation to occur. And you can't declare "war" on a military concept...so WTF are you talking about?



I know you're asking me...thats why I pointed out to you (idiot with little reading comprehension) that the subject was the Iraqi War...are you still confused ?..........Yeah, the "war" in Iraq has been over for quite some time and the occupation continues....
We know it was never 'officially declared' .... I've all ready commented on that....so you're repeating yourself for nothing....
And, as a sovereign country, we really don't give a shit what the UN has to say about how we choose to defend ourselves....("we" being US patriots)



"nor was the criteria by Congress met for hostilities/occupation to occur." ???

You're obviously not familiar with the "Iraq War Resolution" either....simply put:

The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."

WTF are you talking about?


I'm talking about HJR114, you braying jackass!
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/congress/h_j_res_114.htm

I'm talking about violation of the UN Charter http://www.thefourreasons.org/iraqinvasion.html

Your problem is that you only excerpt what you like......READ THE WHOLE THING, YOU NIT!


Funny, one was never officially declared!





So to paraphrase an old saying, "three wrongs make a right" in your intellectually impotent mind?

Actually, its two wrongs that make a right..and understandable mistake for one with a lower IQ such as yourself.......is English not your native language?



Carry on, Clara
Click to expand...



:palm: Folks, read posts #242 and 252, and then someone get an adult to clue this dumbass in. Also, someone tell him that "Clarabell" only relates to senior citizens and has no real relevence today.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Translation: the Post Modern Fool is pissed because I kicked his sorry ass several times today, so this lame retort is all he's got left....so much more to pity him! :(
Click to expand...
lol....sorry, Touchie....not only have you not kicked my ass, it appears you are still over in the corner trying to figure out which of that pair of shitkickers fits on your left foot.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top