Bush ADMITS Iraq had no WMD! PRETEND TIME IS OVER BUSHIES!

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
For those who still belive in some imagined version of this war in Iraq... Even you leader admits...

1) WMD was the main reason we went to IRAQ.
2) IRAQ HAD NO WMD...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Now, look, I -- part of the reason we went into Iraq: was -- the main reason we went into Iraq: at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction."

GEORGE W. BUSH, AUGUST 21, 2006 Press conference!
 
Do you have a link to that Bush quote? You are not known to be very accurate in how you quote people.
 
Do you have a link to that Bush quote? You are not known to be very accurate in how you quote people.

1) Achually I am known for being EXTREEMLY ACCURATE IN MY QUOTES.

2) You can find it if you choose, its all over the net.
 
Not imagined, part of the reason was WMD's. So?


Yes, toby, you poor follower of fashion, Bush threw out the inspectors and rushed into a war with Iraq because they weren't finding the WMDs that weren't there but Bush believed were there and and now admits weren't. But there is an even more sinister turn to all this WMD and don't forget that Iraq we were also told had the "bomb" or was working on the "bomb" or wasenriching uranium for the "bomb", that smoking gun/mushroom cloud thing remember, you do remember that don't you, tob. Well, it turns out that there is a whole new turn in the Valerie Plame WMD connection/situation. Before Plame got fired from her job at the CIA, she was working on WMD in Iraq, and she too was finding nothing, so she had to go, especially after her husband wrote a story saying they were finding nothing, and that as the Downing Street Memo said, the intelligence was "fixed" around the policy. What do you think "fixed" means in this context, tob? Any ideas what it might mean? Come on tob, even you must be able to see that there is something rotten in Bushville, no?

Yeah well here's something for you to read and ignore or ignore without reading...that's what Bush does...Like father like son, no???

An excerpt from the book Hubris by Michael Isikoff and David Corn gives new insight into Plame's outing by various operatives throughout the Bush administration. The book helps answer the pesky question what did Valerie Wilson do at the CIA? Was she merely an analyst--as Bob Novak and others have claimed? Was she only a desk-jockey--as Jonah Goldberg of The National Review insisted? No! She was operations chief of the Joint Task Force on Iraq (JTFI), a unit of the Counterproliferation Division of the clandestine Directorate of Operations.

For the two years prior to her outing, Valerie Wilson worked gathering intelligence that would support the Bush White House's assertion that Saddam Hussein's Iraq was loaded with WMDs. This means that Armitage--as well as Karl Rove and Scooter Libby--leaked classified information about a undercover CIA officer whose job it had been to look for evidence of Saddam's WMD programs. Any irony here? During this part of her career, Valerie Wilson traveled overseas to monitor operations she and her staff at JTFI were mounting. Gee, too bad this information hasn't come out before, huh, tod?

What Valerie Plame Really Did at the CIA

by DAVID CORN

In the spring of 2002 Dick Cheney made one of his periodic trips to CIA headquarters. Officers and analysts were summoned to brief him on Iraq. Paramilitary specialists updated the Vice President on an extensive covert action program in motion that was designed to pave the way to a US invasion. Cheney questioned analysts about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. How could they be used against US troops? Which Iraqi units had chemical and biological weapons? He was not seeking information on whether Saddam posed a threat because he possessed such weapons. His queries, according to a CIA officer at the briefing, were pegged to the assumptions that Iraq had these weapons and would be invaded--as if a decision had been made.

Though Cheney was already looking toward war, the officers of the agency's Joint Task Force on Iraq--part of the Counterproliferation Division of the agency's clandestine Directorate of Operations--were frantically toiling away in the basement, mounting espionage operations to gather information on the WMD programs Iraq might have. The JTFI was trying to find evidence that would back up the White House's assertion that Iraq was a WMD danger. Its chief of operations was a career undercover officer named Valerie Wilson.

Her specific position at the CIA is revealed for the first time in a new book, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War, by the author of this article and Newsweek's Michael Isikoff. The book chronicles the inside battles within the CIA, the White House, the State Department and Congress during the run-up to the war. Its account of Wilson's CIA career is mainly based on interviews with confidential CIA sources.

In July 2003--four months after the invasion of Iraq--Wilson would be outed as a CIA "operative on weapons of mass destruction" in a column by conservative journalist Robert Novak, who would cite two "senior administration officials" as his sources. (As Hubris discloses, one was Richard Armitage, the number-two at the State Department; Karl Rove, Bush's chief strategist, was the other. I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, also talked to two reporters about her.) Novak revealed her CIA identity--using her maiden name, Valerie Plame--in the midst of the controversy ignited by former ambassador Joseph Wilson, her husband, who had written a New York Times op-ed accusing the Bush Administration of having "twisted" intelligence "to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

The Novak column triggered a scandal and a criminal investigation. At issue was whether Novak's sources had violated a little-known law that makes it a federal crime for a government official to disclose identifying information about a covert US officer (if that official knew the officer was undercover). A key question was, what did Valerie Wilson do at the CIA? Was she truly undercover? In a subsequent column, Novak reported that she was "an analyst, not in covert operations." White House press secretary Scott McClellan suggested that her employment at the CIA was no secret. Jonah Goldberg of National Review claimed, "Wilson's wife is a desk jockey and much of the Washington cocktail circuit knew that already."

Valerie Wilson was no analyst or paper-pusher. She was an operations officer working on a top priority of the Bush Administration. Armitage, Rove and Libby had revealed information about a CIA officer who had searched for proof of the President's case. In doing so, they harmed her career and put at risk operations she had worked on and foreign agents and sources she had handled.

Another issue was whether Valerie Wilson had sent her husband to Niger to check out an intelligence report that Iraq had sought uranium there. Hubris contains new information undermining the charge that she arranged this trip. In an interview with the authors, Douglas Rohn, a State Department officer who wrote a crucial memo related to the trip, acknowledges he may have inadvertently created a misimpression that her involvement was more significant than it had been.

Valerie Plame was recruited into the CIA in 1985, straight out of Pennsylvania State University. After two years of training to be a covert case officer, she served a stint on the Greece desk, according to Fred Rustmann, a former CIA official who supervised her then. Next she was posted to Athens and posed as a State Department employee. Her job was to spot and recruit agents for the agency. In the early 1990s, she became what's known as a nonofficial cover officer. NOCs are the most clandestine of the CIA's frontline officers. They do not pretend to work for the US government; they do not have the protection of diplomatic immunity. They might claim to be a businessperson. She told people she was with an energy firm. Her main mission remained the same: to gather agents for the CIA.

In 1997 she returned to CIA headquarters and joined the Counterproliferation Division. (About this time, she moved in with Joseph Wilson; they later married.) She was eventually given a choice: North Korea or Iraq. She selected the latter. Come the spring of 2001, she was in the CPD's modest Iraq branch. But that summer--before 9/11--word came down from the brass: We're ramping up on Iraq. Her unit was expanded and renamed the Joint Task Force on Iraq. Within months of 9/11, the JTFI grew to fifty or so employees. Valerie Wilson was placed in charge of its operations group.

Full Story
 
Bush didn't throw out the inspectors, Saddam did. Saddam said he had the weapons as did every intel service in the western world. Saddam have an invenory at the end of the Gulf War that he was to dispose of and he couldn't prove where it went, we still don't know, but we know he had it.

The rest of that crap is way off base and just distortion.
 
"Now, look, I -- part of the reason we went into Iraq: was -- the main reason we went into Iraq: at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction."

GEORGE W. BUSH, AUGUST 21, 2006 Press conference!
 
Bush didn't throw out the inspectors, Saddam did. Saddam said he had the weapons as did every intel service in the western world. Saddam have an invenory at the end of the Gulf War that he was to dispose of and he couldn't prove where it went, we still don't know, but we know he had it.

The rest of that crap is way off base and just distortion.

WHAT? Bush pulled out our inspectors right before he attacked Saddam....

Saddam had agreed to the inspectors free reign within his country...ONCE AGAIN, Bush pulled the inspectors out.
 
WHAT? Bush pulled out our inspectors right before he attacked Saddam....

Saddam had agreed to the inspectors free reign within his country...ONCE AGAIN, Bush pulled the inspectors out.
He informed the UN he was going in and asked them to remove them to safety... And Saddam had said they had free reign but the inspectors clearly were being led around and didn't have this free access...
 
The future will always shape the foregone years. I.E. ...as a whole.. most now view the Clinton Presidency in a much favorable light than 5 or 6 years ago...
Iraq .. now 3.5 years old is shaping out to be one of the most embarrassing blunders in American History. One needs only to ask thy self a single question; why did we go into Iraq? Weapons of Mass Destruction? Do I believe Iraq had them? Possibly...after all ... the Intelligence reports before and after Bush were pretty much in agreement. Many Democrats were in agreement. But.. 5 years after 9/11(when official hunt for WMD's began), we still have not found convincing evidence that they existed.
So.. why did we go into Iraq? To spread Democracy and free the Iraqi People from a opressive Dictator. Sounds noble.. but did the Iraqi people ask for this noble favor? Well, 3.5 years later the threat of a major Ciivl War continues to disrupt and kill thousands upon thousands of Iraqi people. I dont believe the Iraqi people requested this type of favor.
So why did we go into Iraq? How about the obvious... to strategically
place ourselves in a position of power in what is the Oil Farm of the world. Everyone in Washington knew the truth from the get go.. but all played dumb. This was all about Energy Folks.. and it is a dirty game and one that that needs to come to an end.
The Democrats are just as guilty as the republicans ... not all.. the few that did state the obvious can hold their heads up high and utter those words.. "I told you so" ..
One thing though.. when all is said and done we will be in debt to the Iraqi people for a long, long time ... get ready for Iraq to replace Israel as the number one recipeint for foriegn aid.... for many years to come.
 
Back
Top