Bush Makes Power Grab

A. It's not inevitable. that's a lie.
B. it's impossible to not buy imported goods goods when domestic competition has been put out of business.

All international trade is not bad. We should simply limit trade to partners who have a similar notion of the moral context in which business should be placed. we could have "good globalism", but the globalist in control now are not good. they believe in oppression.

The best way to fight it is to keep telling the truth about it, instead of kicking other people down we agree with because we ourselves may feel hopeless at times.

Your contradictions between A and B do pretty much prove my point and seem to be mutually exclusive of each other.
 
Your contradictions between A and B do pretty much prove my point and seem to be mutually exclusive of each other.

Not at all. We can change trade policy to restore the existence of domestic or even NON SLAVE PRODUCED goods. Your thinking excludes the possibility of change. Why is that? Why are you locked into your shitty outlook?
 
I am taking this back to the power grab issue. REnough of your trying to redirect the thread away form bush's popwer grab.

Your redemption from the dark side is not yet complete Asshopper.
 
I am taking this back to the power grab issue. REnough of your trying to redirect the thread away form bush's popwer grab.

Your redemption from the dark side is not yet complete Asshopper.


Bush's power grab is all about the NWO. you want to criticize bush, pretending your precious dems are somehow not involved.

Fight the darkness, uscitizen. Fight The alien hierarchy

http://www.montalk.net/alien
They are prone to wishful thinking due to their narrow probable reality range. Hyperdimensional beings occupy a bandwidth of probable realities whose spectrum corresponds to their soul frequencies. So those of a negative nature who vibrate at a lower and more restricted rate tend to operate within a more limited range of probable realities. This makes them blind to certain outcomes (probabilities) that are not within their perception.
They are very practical, so they seek the easiest route. This is because they must economize their energy and strategy. The nature of self-serving evolution involves conquest over finite resources, so efficiency and calculation are necessary.
They cannot easily deviate from their plans — all is calculated. It takes them a while to adjust to new evasive tactics employed by a target. Part of this is due to them attacking from outside linear time, meaning they send in their attack simultaneously along the past, present, and future. So what appears to us as an attack spanning several days or weeks is for them them a single instant, and so they appear slow to respond to our improvisations.
They cannot deal with complexity easily unless pre-calculated. Most of what they do is geared toward optimizing success, which usually involves moving along the probable reality that best fits their end goals. But there is always a freewill factor which throws things off, and if a target uses freewill to be unpredictable, this adds incalculable complexity to the range of branching probabilities and therefore disorients them.
They think they always have the advantage, so they get careless; many times they don’t expect resistance because they think their agenda is secret and beyond human comprehension.
Lack of unity among them disrupts the spiritual coherence of their collective and therefore disintegrates what energy they collect, meaning they have to keep collecting more, thus they are like black holes needing more and more energy like a hyperdimensional pyramid scheme.
They preside over lower (human) levels of the control system:
 
Last edited:
Seriously, if this goes into effect he could pretty much be the dictator, shoot not even pretty much it even includes tribal authorities.

I don't give a rats ass who it is, I don't want this happening in MY nation on MY watch. This needs to be removed from the "directives" as quickly as possible.
 
"Bush Makes Power Grab" is about as informative today as the headline "Elvis Eats Chicken" would have been in 1976.

But where is the "loyal opposition"? Why aren't reid and pelosi on the steps of the capital filled with vim, vigor, and venom?
 
I think it is quite a stretch of the imagination that a "liberal media" would not be all over this story....
 
AHZ is just another example of a "reformed" NEO that can't figure it out Ornot.

What haven't I figured out? It seems the only difference between me and you is that you have a fatalistic attitude. The alleged "inevitablity of evil' is no form of wisdom. It's a vehicle of evil.
 
Quite simple really, bush could not do this without congress being a willing participant. Well over 90% of our govt sucks!
So let me see, liberals are in on it, Bush is in on it and only the "bush-loving" right-wing media is making a stink?

Seriously, dude. This is inane. It was written and posted in quiet, the press didn't pick up on it because they too don't pay attention. If it isn't on the AP it doesn't even exist for these people anymore.
 
Damo, you are right it is not on AP anywhere. I wonder why that is ?
All I can seem to find are blogsphere type of hits.....
Strange action/inaction for a liberal news media ....

those that control information control the world.
 
Damo, you are right it is not on AP anywhere. I wonder why that is ?
All I can seem to find are blogsphere type of hits.....
Strange action/inaction for a liberal news media ....

those that control information control the world.
Sometimes other forms of media break a story. Seriously, even the Inquirer has scooped the media on important matters because they actually do have people who still go and search for the story rather than just get it off the wires.

It isn't because it doesn't exist. I provided the link to the White House site where you can read the directive yourself. I'll bet this will be on O'Reilly tonight. Not much, but I'll actually bet.
 
I wouldn't know about O'Liely, have not watched him in a long time.
But why did not the "liberal" media jump all over this ? AP is "liberal" media too.
 
I wouldn't know about O'Liely, have not watched him in a long time.
But why did not the "liberal" media jump all over this ? AP is "liberal" media too.
They will, if this has "legs".

Somebody brought it to their attention.

Why didn't the actual liberal blogspots get it first? Seriously, attempting to say that because they lean liberal they catch everything is a logical fallacy.

It only takes me reading one of the stories on Illegal Immigration in MSM to know the lean. They won't even use the word "illegal" anymore and "immigration" seems out in many of them.

The Denver Post uses "Mexican National Resident"... Which way do you think they lean?
 
Ahh you do still operate on political faith where the midia is concerned, don't you ?

Still believe the media is a liberal beast and is not controlled by big money....
 
Back
Top