What kind of tRumploving fuxstick are you? That is a rhetorical question.......lol
By accepting the pardon, Flynn acknowledges his guilt.
- Thread starter Tacomaman
- Start date
What kind of tRumploving fuxstick are you? That is a rhetorical question.......lol
Exactly
Now these tRump fuxstick are hell bent on defending a known traitor. Does their dispicability have no bottom?
They're defending a traitor, and they're the ones who pretend to being staunchly patriotic.
Peace n Safety
Banned
Assgendering and abortions are the sacraments of the left’s religion of climate change [emoji291]
Blessings
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Excellent points.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I know. There is no statute or case law to confirm your claim.
Argumentum ad hominem. Fail.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Apparently you're not smart enough to answer straight forward questions much less baited ones.
Spend more time educating yourself Bullwinkle......lol
Spend more time educating yourself Bullwinkle........lol
Pretty elementary really. Then you get the double digit IQ'ers like Bullwinkle the moose brain, who seem to struggle with basic concepts.
If they spent half of the time studying that they do stroking tRump's shriveled "mushroom", they simply wouldnt be so damned ignorant.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Why do you think they do it?
Flynn is a hero who is only guilty of being politically persecuted. I will always recognize Flynn's pardon for being politically persecuted as his most prestigious achievement. God bless Flynn, and American hero!
Judge Sullivan asked the FBI lawyer why they did not charge treason. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his job as a foreign county's lobbyist while he was taking an NSA job. Rightys may be unable to figure out why that is wrong. It seems pretty obvious to the rest of the world.
Peace n Safety
Banned
Old Trapper
Verified User
You are right. There is just common sense, and that does not include you.
How could that be since you have posted nothing to prove his analysis to be in error?
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
"Once pardoned, however, there is no legal jeopardy for past federal crimes. Therefore, the Fifth Amendment can no longer be a shield and permit Trump’s pardoned associates from refusing to answer questions under penalty of perjury. This creates a paradox for President Trump. When he pardons an individual, they are free from possible prosecution but they are also uncloaked of their most robust constitutional protection.
This may well be why President Trump has not pardoned Flynn, for example. Given the reported substantial contacts between Flynn and Russian government emissaries, given Flynn’s patent falsities including on federal forms completed under penalty of perjury, Flynn’s only protection presently from being compelled to testify – including possibly against the President and others – is the Fifth Amendment self-incrimination clause. Imagine if that was no longer a shield. Grand Jury, FBI Agents, Congress all could drill Flynn under oath. Any material prevarication would be punishable as perjury. At that point Flynn’s personal interest will be to tell the truth, even if that truth incriminates the President who fired him."
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I believe there is a reason why you did not provide a link. No worries, i found it.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
I know.
Anybody who took a couple of semesters of business law understands law is not "comman sense." Anything but. If it was there'd be no need for law schools.