The Supreme Court has no authority over the Constitution.
CALIFORNIA to make its low gun fatality rate even lower with more gun regulation
- Thread starter Micawber
- Start date
The Supreme Court has no authority over the Constitution.
Son of the Revolution
Banned
Stay in China you fucking POS
They don't seem to realize that. They want to start a fucking war.
No. I will stay here and defend the Constitution.
Son of the Revolution
Banned
Do you support the 2nd Amendment?
Hmmm ... should I use email, fed x, or ups ???
I support the entire Constitution of the United States, including the 2nd amendment.
No court has authority to interpret or change the Constitution. Article III is very clear about the powers and authority of the Supreme Court (and all courts under it).
The Constitution of the United States was created by the colonies, which became States by ordaining this document power. The Constitution created the federal government and all of its branches as the agent of that contract. The States own the Constitution. They created it. Only they can change it. Only they can interpret it. Only they can destroy it (and thus dissolve the federal government).
The federal government created by the Constitution has NO power over the Constitution. They MUST operate UNDER the Constitution. They have NO authority OVER it.
The Supreme Court has routinely ignored this, and passed various rulings illegally. These can be ignored.
The 2nd amendment discusses two inherent rights that are related. The right of a free State to defend itself. It does this by organizing a militia (an army) made up of citizens of that State; and the inherent right of an individual to defend himself by any means necessary using any weapons necessary. This amendment applies to the States as well as the federal government. NO law may be passed that infringes on either inherent right.
If any government departs from the Constitution, it is the right, and indeed the responsibility, to restore a republic as the form of government, by violent means if necessary. That is, if the Constitution is to be honored at all. The States own the Constitution. They also have that right.
The Democrats seek to destroy the Constitution and all State constitutions. They want to form an oligarchy as the form of government so they can implement their fascism (government manipulation of markets) and communism (government ownership of markets). To do that they must attempt to disarm any dissidents.
They can't. People are buying guns and ammunition so fast factories can't build 'em fast enough. They are NOT going to just give up those guns because a government tells them to. These idiot Democrats had better do some serious navel gazing before they push this into a civil war. They do not realize...they are outnumbered and outgunned.
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
What you have in California is a dichotomy between urban areas and the rest of the state. In most of California's larger cities, particularly the inland ones, violent crime is through the rafters. What makes California's overall rate a bit lower than the national average is the large rural and small town population the state has.
In these same cities:
* Antifa and BLM violence has brought these cities to become a living hell. In several of these cities, they are still active and violent. It is not safe to go downtown in these cities anymore, particularly at night.
* Homelessness and unsanitary conditions abound. Even diseases like cholera, the Black Death, and a variety of other disease that were once conquered are returning among the homeless encampments.
* Crime and gang activity, fueled by drug sales due to Prohibition, abound. The damage among society is incredible. Minds are destroyed permanently by some of these drugs, leading to mental cases freely wandering the streets, presenting a danger to the public.
* Price controls and other fascist laws abound in the cities. This is theft of property by the government (including city government).
* Guns and other weapons are everywhere, despite any attempt by any government to limit them. This only acts like Prohibition again, creating a black market for weapons. This also funds gang activity and violent crime.
Once shining cities have become Democrat run hellholes.
* Antifa and BLM violence has brought these cities to become a living hell. In several of these cities, they are still active and violent. It is not safe to go downtown in these cities anymore, particularly at night.
* Homelessness and unsanitary conditions abound. Even diseases like cholera, the Black Death, and a variety of other disease that were once conquered are returning among the homeless encampments.
* Crime and gang activity, fueled by drug sales due to Prohibition, abound. The damage among society is incredible. Minds are destroyed permanently by some of these drugs, leading to mental cases freely wandering the streets, presenting a danger to the public.
* Price controls and other fascist laws abound in the cities. This is theft of property by the government (including city government).
* Guns and other weapons are everywhere, despite any attempt by any government to limit them. This only acts like Prohibition again, creating a black market for weapons. This also funds gang activity and violent crime.
Once shining cities have become Democrat run hellholes.
Oh no. It is about having people sell their weapons back to the state where they would be destroyed. They do not knock on doors. Always law biding. They almost all are until they shoot someone.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're not the final abattoir of what the constitution means. The woman is truly demented and habitually slaughters the English language.
Unconstitutional.
The Constitution means what it says.
For 40 years, the violence in the biggest cities has been decreasing. It is too early to say that trend has ended, but it does look very possible that great trend has ended. For 40 years, white rural areas have become worse, which is a trend that has not changed. So now the people who have failed the worst, and continue to fail tell us we all have to follow their example.
Well the question is who will pay the taxes? Rural people pay a small fraction of the taxes compared to benefits they get. If suburban and urban people follow their example, and pay little to no taxes, who will support the rural people?
Well the question is who will pay the taxes? Rural people pay a small fraction of the taxes compared to benefits they get. If suburban and urban people follow their example, and pay little to no taxes, who will support the rural people?
Making up shit again?
What trend? Random numbers have no trend.
Making up shit again?
Democrat run cities are NOT going to succeed telling anyone to follow their example.
Rural people can support themselves, and quite well. They are the ones that build the roads, build the bridges, grow the food, provide the power, provide the water, and provide EVERYTHING for the cities to even survive.
Owning guns is a natural right.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yet you still refuse to even try to understand it. Instead, you rely on black robed tyrants to tell you what a document that limits their power means........that says something entirely......
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and yet that 'indepent' branch of the government you believe understands that document better than any other regular citizen stated in Heller that it is indeed an individual right.........maybe you should read that one as well