gonzojournals
Better than You
The ten commandments are different than the noahide laws. The ten commandments do not call for theocracy. The Noahide Laws do.
No, they don't, you retard.
The ten commandments are different than the noahide laws. The ten commandments do not call for theocracy. The Noahide Laws do.
No, they don't, you retard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah
1.Prohibition of Idolatry: There is only one God. You shall not make for yourself an idol.
2.Prohibition of Murder: You shall not murder.
3.Prohibition of Theft: You shall not steal.
4.Prohibition of Sexual Promiscuity: You shall not commit adultery.
5.Prohibition of Blasphemy: Revere God and do not blaspheme.
6.Prohibition of Cruelty to Animals: Do not eat flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive.
7.Requirement to have just Laws: You shall set up an effective judiciary to fairly judge observance of the preceding six laws.
I thought someone recently changed that...so it was you after all.
Matthew was a tax collector, not Paul.
Anyway. The noahide laws ARE conclusively a recipe for theocracy.
Opps yes You are right. But Paul seemed to write most of the new testament.
It is simply stating that God calls the sin of homosexuallity an abomination. We aren't attacking gay people, just the sin and lifestyle they choose to have.
Most of the people who attack Christianity have never taken the time to learn about the faith, either. It is much easier to pull things out of context and quote them with indignation.
And so what if King James was gay? He didn't write the Bible.
So what? Are you telling me that a few thousand people (at most) are going to force the world into servitude?
Who did?
I'm betting you don't know.
How did I "attack christianity" with facts? How is that even possible?
My point is that christianity is faith, that's it .. just as is every other religion.
You don't have one shred of proof, fact, or evidence .. just faith, that's it.
You are welcome to faith in whatever you believe .. you are not welcome to impose your lack of fact, proof, or evidence, on anyone else.
Yes all faith. some of the cities mentioned in the bible have been found, but there is not even any real proof that Jesus existed.
The Bible wasn't written by a single person, and I don't read the King James version anyway.
But yet, you know FOR A FACT he was not the first christian. How is that?
It means also, Chrstlike.Based on the definition of what a christian is. A follower of Jesus.
Unless you are claiming Jesus chased his own tail ?
Based on the definition of what a christian is. A follower of Jesus.
Unless you are claiming Jesus chased his own tail ?
Yes all faith. some of the cities mentioned in the bible have been found, but there is not even any real proof that Jesus existed.