Can a person who voted for Trump be a respectable human being?

The OP of this thread is a prime example of how twisted and sick and perverted Liberals are in the head. The are literally Demonic
 
Trump won because most of us voted never Hillary. Trump the man is awful but based on my IRA's his policies are working and that is the important thing. The presidency is not nor ever should be a popularity contest. Do what is best for the country and to hell with being popular.

Why didn't you say what you really mean- like...

"To Hell with Law and Order"!

"To Hell with Morality"!

"To Hell with the truth"!

"To Hell with Reality"!

"To Hell with holding this president Accountable for anything"!

"To Hell with Fair Elections"!

"To Hell with Integrity"!

"To Hell with Ethics"!

"To Hell with human Rights"!

"To Hell with Justice"!

"To Hell with Mexicans"!

"To Hell with Nepotism laws"!

"To Hell with Rape and Sexual Abuse laws and victims of Rape and Sexual Abuse"!

"To Hell with Campaign and Campaign Finance laws"!

"To Hell with anyone who does not agree with Donald Trump on anything and everything"!

"To Hell with anyone who does not agree with himself- on anything and everything"!

I believe we are seeing a pattern here!

tenor.gif
 
Why didn't you say what you really mean- like...

"To Hell with Law and Order"!

"To Hell with Morality"!

"To Hell with the truth"!

"To Hell with Reality"!

"To Hell with holding this president Accountable for anything"!

"To Hell with Fair Elections"!

"To Hell with Integrity"!

"To Hell with Ethics"!

"To Hell with human Rights"!

"To Hell with Justice"!

"To Hell with Mexicans"!

"To Hell with Nepotism laws"!

"To Hell with Rape and Sexual Abuse laws and victims of Rape and Sexual Abuse"!

"To Hell with Campaign and Campaign Finance laws"!

"To Hell with anyone who does not agree with Donald Trump on anything and everything"!

"To Hell with anyone who does not agree with himself- on anything and everything"!

I believe we are seeing a pattern here!

tenor.gif

Great list of reasons why people didn't vote for Hillary. I didn't think you had it in you.
 
What deregulation(s) specifically have helped the economy?
soo many..
there is also the "businese climate" were business has more confidence it won't be blind sided if it opens expands.

Assessing the Economic Impact of Deregulation
One of the most controversial issues in public policy relates to the role of government regulation of the economy.

https://www.westernsouthern.com/for...assessing-the-economic-impact-of-deregulation
The top economic goal of the Trump administration is to boost the U.S. economy through changes in the tax code and diminished regulations. While economic growth has accelerated, the importance of regulatory changes often is downplayed by economists because it is difficult to quantify the overall impact.

Survey results for businesses — especially smaller firms — suggest regulatory changes are having some impact nonetheless: As shown in Figure 1 below, there is a link between the way small businesses view regulations and improvements in manufacturing sentiment.1 This is consistent with research that shows the impact of government regulations is greatest on small size firms.

The environment is an extensive area of regulations to deal with externalities such as pollution. However, several studies suggest environmental regulations have become overly complex, and market-based solutions offer a more effective means for dealing with the problem of acid rain. Although several former Republican policymakers have proposed a carbon tax to combat global warming, President Trump believes the costs are too great for the economy.

Another important area is financial services, where the principal challenge is to ensure stability without turning banks into quasi-utilities. It is too early to ascertain the impact of policy changes to lessen the impact of Dodd-Frank, but financial stocks have matched the overall stock market for the first time in several years after trailing the broad market consistently since 2008.

the United States fares well when compared with many industrialized nations. A study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) undertaken a decade ago found the U.S. barriers had higher regulatory barriers to entrepreneurship, greater administrative burdens on small business owners, and higher barriers to competition than a number of other industrialized countries. An article in The Economist titled “Over-regulated America” (February 18, 2012) made the following observation:
 
If that's the explanation, why did Trump get 3 million fewer votes than Hillary?

The answer is very obvious. Unlike dumbfucks like Hillary (and apparently a lot of liberals) Trump understood that the presidency is awarded to the winner of the electoral college, not the popular vote. Trump ran his campaign to win the contest that matters. I doubt it will sink in, but I tried to educate you.
 
soo many..

I still have yet to see a single piece of legislation or regulatory change that anyone can point to, that has had a positive and lasting impact on the current bull market or the economy in general. Your article just lists a number of things that *might* affect it. I'm left to conclude that Trump hasn't done much of anything to make the economy grow other than have an (R) after his name. I suspect that it would have turned out the same, no matter who was elected -- as long as he had an (R) after his name. And *that* should tell you something about business in America.
 
Trump won because most of us voted never Hillary. Trump the man is awful but based on my IRA's his policies are working and that is the important thing. The presidency is not nor ever should be a popularity contest. Do what is best for the country and to hell with being popular.

Judas sold out Christ for 30 pieces of silver.
 
I have several former friends and relatives, I'm embarrassed to say, who did vote for the pigfucker Trump;

and the fact that I use the word "former" pretty much answers my own question.

Trump, despite being a chronic liar, did not disguise who he was in his presidential campaign.

The vile, disgusting people who voted for him got exactly that for which they voted.

Consequently, nothing else that could be described as positive about their demeanor or character mitigates the reality of what they are.

They are people of absolutely no intrinsic value whose immediate disappearance would be nothing but a huge boon for the universe.


I have expanded my definition for worthless people. I no longer limit that classification to troglodytes who voted for Trump.

I have expanded it to include people who didn't vote for Trump but did not disown their friends and family who did.

Inability to unconditionally hate a Trump voter, no matter who it is, indicates a fatal character flaw.

To tolerate such people socially is to define oneself as an indiscriminate and fundamentally unprincipled person.

Many people believe in redemption for anything. They are dead wrong. Having voted for Trump is an irredeemable transgression that identifies one as a person whose birth was a terrible mistake of nature.

I wouldn't say it's irredeemable, but I can't really see someone who voted for Trump as not having a low intelligence. Maybe there are some exceptions, such as people who just felt he was the lesser evil.
 
I have several former friends and relatives, I'm embarrassed to say, who did vote for the pigfucker Trump;

and the fact that I use the word "former" pretty much answers my own question.

Trump, despite being a chronic liar, did not disguise who he was in his presidential campaign.

The vile, disgusting people who voted for him got exactly that for which they voted.

Consequently, nothing else that could be described as positive about their demeanor or character mitigates the reality of what they are.

They are people of absolutely no intrinsic value whose immediate disappearance would be nothing but a huge boon for the universe.


I have expanded my definition for worthless people. I no longer limit that classification to troglodytes who voted for Trump.

I have expanded it to include people who didn't vote for Trump but did not disown their friends and family who did.

Inability to unconditionally hate a Trump voter, no matter who it is, indicates a fatal character flaw.

To tolerate such people socially is to define oneself as an indiscriminate and fundamentally unprincipled person.

Many people believe in redemption for anything. They are dead wrong. Having voted for Trump is an irredeemable transgression that identifies one as a person whose birth was a terrible mistake of nature.
Now this is one angry pervert, folks. ;)
 
Back
Top