Can one prove god exists? or doesn't?

a] Answer the questions!

What is God?

What is there to prove about this God?

If you were shown God...then what?

Have you an opinion/plan/speech ready ...for when you would be face-to-face with God?

You don't know what to expect? You don't know what to do in the presence of God?

Lodge complaints? Ask for a ham sandwich? Expect your feet to washed?

What preparations should an educated and sincere person make if it is God's existence is proven?

What preparations should an educated and sincere person make if it is God's existence is NOT proven?

b] If you don't answer ---then you are trolling about a topic that you can't even identify.

Identify God!

You can identify Elvis.
You can identify 14 karat Gold.
You can identify all sorts of sea life.
You can identify many car models.
You can identify pornography.
You can identify a mugger in a line up.

Please identify God.


Blathering on and on about the existence of something you cannot identify!

Apparently you are a fucking nut case.

Crawl back to where you emerged...and sleep for a while.

You are out of control.
 
Q. Can one prove Frank Aipsa has a girlfriend? or doesn't?

A. WHAT THE FUCK IS A FRANK AIPSA? [But Wait! I don't care and don't want to know]

That you can be 100% sure of!
 
Nope. One can not prove that god(s) exist or don't exist.

Religion is an open functional system. Open functional systems do not have the power of proof.
 
A negative can be proven.

But one cannot prove a negative so universal as "There are no gods."

Give this one a shot, though.

Make the assertion, "There are no live African Elephants living in my basement right now."

See if that cannot be proven.

the goyim god can be disproven using their own goy bible
 
the goyim god can be disproven using their own goy bible

Whatever. The "goyim" god...is the "non-goyim god" also. It was fucked up right from the beginning.

Best that god had never been invented.

In any case, I do not want to get into that horseshit.

I am saying that a negative can be proven...but some negatives are too universal to be proven.

Some positives cannot be proven either.
 
not even the simplest of physical thing can create itself, carry out the tasks it is made for. And we are talking about millions of species that are co existing, reproducing in a world that is beyond our frame of logic. Does that not explain the fact that there has to be a Creator who has made this system possible. For those who still believe that there is no God, do you honestly believe the iphone could have been made on its own. It's just a simple example
 
not even the simplest of physical thing can create itself, carry out the tasks it is made for. And we are talking about millions of species that are co existing, reproducing in a world that is beyond our frame of logic. Does that not explain the fact that there has to be a Creator who has made this system possible. For those who still believe that there is no God, do you honestly believe the iphone could have been made on its own. It's just a simple example

So...your version of logic say that what we humans see...IS TOO COMPLICATED TO EXIST WITHOUT A CREATOR.

And then you suppose something MUCH, MUCH, MUCH MORE COMPLICATED exists...and that it did not have a creator.

Can you truly not see the absurdity of that thinking, David?

The originator of this thread offers arguments so poor they do not even qualify as logic. Your comments are of the same ilk.

Grow the spine to acknowledge that you do not know if any gods exist or not. It will be a growing-up experience for you.
 
Got to take you to task here davidpratt.

You claim:

not even the simplest of physical thing can create itself, ...


It appears that your reserve autogenetic properties/attributes for NON-PHYSICAL things?

Do you have an example of some thing that did create itself?

If non-physical things are capable of creating themselves, then how do you detect their existence?
.
 
Back
Top