Can the country be unified?

That is why I’m going after these people for not embracing the truth no matter who they claim to back
 
I want No lies on either side


That is why I’m a Democratic Party member


They operate on truth and facts


If they don’t then they need to find a different party
 
May I? I like you both, and I'm really glad you're back, but you are wrong on this one. Both (D)s and (R)s have gerrymandered. That being said, it is far worse now due to the influence of ALEC. Their stated goal was to gain (R) majorities at the state and local level expressly to enable them to gerrymander and put more (R)s in Congress. So in the last 20 years, they've done a bang-up job of it. And *that* being said, here is one district in Maryland that the (D)s gerrymandered. It was the subject of a recent SCOTUS decision.

"The 6th District shared center stage in the Supreme Court decision that federal courts have no role in settling claims of partisan gerrymandering. Democrats conceded their explicit goal was to move enough voters around to dilute GOP voting power and defeat the incumbent Republican congressman. As the definition of gerrymandering is to draw lines to give the people in power strategic advantage, and the Democrats admitted doing so, this is clearly one of the country's most gerrymandered districts."

Source, which contains other examples: https://thefulcrum.us/worst-gerrymandering-districts-example/6-suburban-houston

Sorry

I messed up Owlwomans quote


But the fact is still clear

This was a few Democrats in one state not the Democratic Party

They then Very openly Admitted the aim was to harm Republican voters to the courts

Begging for it to to taken to the SCOTUS
You are missing the close quote: [ /quote] <- note the added space. By failing to correctly open quote and close quote (including both brackets and the words), every time you quote yourself it compounds the error. I added a few closed quotes to stabilize it, but do not know if they are in the correct positions.
 
Why do some people (idiots) paint all liberals or conservatives with the same brush by citing the views and actions of the ultra left or right?

Probably intellectual laziness, would be my guess.

I don't believe that *all* of the 70M misguided souls who voted for #LOSER45 are Right Wing Nut Jobs, but a lot of them are. Some of the souls who voted for Biden are Left Wing Nut Jobs, but my guess is far fewer because the more radical ppl on the left refused to vote at all, or voted third party. We can see who the radicals are fairly easily by looking at what they say here and on other public sites where political comment is allowed. For instance, here we have JPP's Best Christian, Sister Stretch, who wants to see the election given to state legislators who then have one vote and one only to select who won the race in that state -- whether the people themselves voted for Biden or not. In other words, she wants to disenfranchise 80 million people who didn't make the choice that she wants. There are others here just as bad. You and I weren't here during the last election. There was plenty of carping from the left on Amazon though, when the Toadstool won, but I never once saw any leftie post anything that radical about overturning the will of the people.
 
I want No lies on either side

That is why I’m a Democratic Party member

They operate on truth and facts

If they don’t then they need to find a different party
Me too but there's NFW that's ever going to happen when human beings are involved.

One day tech will be invented that allows others to immediately determine if a person believes they are telling the truth, but, like Trump, there's a difference between a person who believes they are speaking the truth and the actual factual truth.
 
Probably intellectual laziness, would be my guess.

I don't believe that *all* of the 70M misguided souls who voted for #LOSER45 are Right Wing Nut Jobs, but a lot of them are. Some of the souls who voted for Biden are Left Wing Nut Jobs, but my guess is far fewer because the more radical ppl on the left refused to vote at all, or voted third party. We can see who the radicals are fairly easily by looking at what they say here and on other public sites where political comment is allowed. For instance, here we have JPP's Best Christian, Sister Stretch, who wants to see the election given to state legislators who then have one vote and one only to select who won the race in that state -- whether the people themselves voted for Biden or not. In other words, she wants to disenfranchise 80 million people who didn't make the choice that she wants. There are others here just as bad. You and I weren't here during the last election. There was plenty of carping from the left on Amazon though, when the Toadstool won, but I never once saw any leftie post anything that radical about overturning the will of the people.

Political forums always have a higher number of older and nuttier people than IRL.
 
Whining about the other side accomplishes nothing as evidenced by Pelosi vs Trump. Not all conservative or liberal ideas are bad. The problem is neither side is willing to compromise and find the best solution to a problem.

I'm not sure how anyone can compromise with people from a party who are so terrified of being insulted on Twitter by the Despot-in-Chief that they refuse to speak up when he outright lies, wrongfully attacks others, and behaves like a rabid raccoon. If they're that cowardly, they sure are too chickenshit to even *think* of compromising with a (D) to do the work of the people. Watch for a new stimulus package to be presented shortly after Biden is sworn in, and watch which party tries to stall it and you'll see what I mean. One's been sitting on Moscow Mitch's desk since May.
 
You can't make adult resolutions with an insane person. People can try, but insanity trumps sanity in such cases.

Quit playing with your tiny pants worm and discuss the facts


You lied about my religious beliefs


Playing with your pants worm won’t disappear that thread
 
Thank you


you produced a claimed case


You also proved my point


The Democratic leader of the party in that state refused to back that cheating and it never passed


The Democratic Party killed the idea and never came to fruition huh

No gerrymandering was implimented


Now what?

Other posters have already provided you additional cases. You're either a liar or delusional, but we both have wasted enough time on this pointless exchange.
 
I'm not sure how anyone can compromise with people from a party who are so terrified of being insulted on Twitter by the Despot-in-Chief that they refuse to speak up when he outright lies, wrongfully attacks others, and behaves like a rabid raccoon. If they're that cowardly, they sure are too chickenshit to even *think* of compromising with a (D) to do the work of the people. Watch for a new stimulus package to be presented shortly after Biden is sworn in, and watch which party tries to stall it and you'll see what I mean. One's been sitting on Moscow Mitch's desk since May.

Compromise can only be based on a shared belief in the facts


We have to get right with facts


All of us


To be able to move forward



gerrymandering is illegal according to the constitution


Even if the SCOTUS disagrees


One party uses gerrymandering where ever they can pass it


I don’t know of one Republican governor who EVER fought their state republicans who did it
 
I dont think it would take many of us doing that consistently to put an end to the mass thread banners....thank you for your efforts.

You violated your own boycott here:
If the Revolution gets the Senate and they decide to roll things will very very ugly very fast now that so many people can see that this election was a fraud.

The guns have not been taken away yet.
 
Me too but there's NFW that's ever going to happen when human beings are involved.

One day tech will be invented that allows others to immediately determine if a person believes they are telling the truth, but, like Trump, there's a difference between a person who believes they are speaking the truth and the actual factual truth.



I don’t lie to pad the Democratic Party or my own ego


Try it sometime
 
I'm not sure how anyone can compromise with people from a party who are so terrified of being insulted on Twitter by the Despot-in-Chief that they refuse to speak up when he outright lies, wrongfully attacks others, and behaves like a rabid raccoon. If they're that cowardly, they sure are too chickenshit to even *think* of compromising with a (D) to do the work of the people. Watch for a new stimulus package to be presented shortly after Biden is sworn in, and watch which party tries to stall it and you'll see what I mean. One's been sitting on Moscow Mitch's desk since May.

The problem with congress is it has become so polarized like the rest of the country the few R's and D's willing to deal are either shouted down or the party leaders shut them up. That is one reason I support term limits.
 
That is why I’m going after these people for not embracing the truth no matter who they claim to back

What is the truth, evince?

What color was the dress? https://media.wired.com/photos/59327b9eaef9a462de9832bd/master/pass/Untitled-12.jpg

Do you see an old woman or a young woman? Which is the truth? Can both be correct?
illusion.gif
 
The problem with congress is it has become so polarized like the rest of the country the few R's and D's willing to deal are either shouted down or the party leaders shut them up. That is one reason I support term limits.

That is the Republicans fault


Working with a Democratic Party member is a death sentence for the republicans

Rino land
 
How do you know she's lying? You two should hook up for a date. Exchange recipes or talk about boys.

Quit fucking talking sex when it comes to female posters you fucking ass breath


And then you wonder why I think you are a phony left poster
 
Back
Top