Candace Owens Learns About The Free Market

[Cypress]

Her appointment was cancelled, all Candace had to do was call another testing site.

I doubt she was getting tested out of a genuine concern for public safety. More likely, she booked a trip to Europe, or a pleasure boat cruise requiring testing, and testing was out of her own self-interest

 

[Althea]

Likely did. It is hypocritical of anyone saying they want to stop the spread of a disease to stop anyone from making a sane choice and getting tested solely for political ideological reasons. Supporting this kind of hypocrisy is equal hypocrisy.

The reality is, if you really don't want to spread the disease and someone is coming to get tested that surprises you, rejecting them because you are surprised doesn't make the point that folks should get tested. This rejection only underlines and supports the arguments that Candace has been making.

If it was important, and they thought she could spread the disease they'd test her, since ideology got in the way we know it is a political decision rather than one based on a healthy community.

They aren't 'surprised' that she wanted a test.

And no...testing doesn't stop the spread of the disease. Everything she rails against is how you stop the spread of the disease.

But nice try.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I doubt she was getting tested out of a genuine concern for public safety. More likely, she booked a trip to Europe, or a pleasure boat cruise requiring testing, and testing was out of self-interest

Irrelevant.

 

[Matt Dillon]

If you read the link, there was another site that was suggested to her.

So..Covid testers should be discriminatory on who they test?

 

[Phantasmal]

Likely did. It is hypocritical of anyone saying they want to stop the spread of a disease to stop anyone from making a sane choice and getting tested solely for political ideological reasons. Supporting this kind of hypocrisy is equal hypocrisy.

The reality is, if you really don't want to spread the disease and someone is coming to get tested that surprises you, rejecting them because you are surprised doesn't make the point that folks should get tested.

How is a test going to keep Candace from spreading it when she doesn’t support the guidelines? She won’t wear a mask, she didn’t quarantine when her husband had COVID and she refuses to get vaccinated. The woman has the right to reject her business.

 

[Althea]

I doubt she was getting tested out of a genuine concern for public safety. More likely, she booked a trip to Europe, or a pleasure boat cruise requiring testing, and testing was out of her own self-interest

I'll bet you are right. Although, it does say that her husband was sick. Given that she doesn't believe in Covid, she probably needed a negative test for an event, as you suggest.

 

[Hawkeye10]

How is a test going to keep Candace from spreading it when she doesn’t support the guidelines? She won’t wear a mask, she didn’t quarantine when her husband had COVID and she refuses to get vaccinated. The woman has the right to reject her business.

No, as Candice points out this service is funded by government, administrators have zero right to refuse service.

 

[Damocles]

They aren't 'surprised' that she wanted a test.

And no...testing doesn't stop the spread of the disease. Everything she rails against is how you stop the spread of the disease.

But nice try.

Understanding you are positive or negative helps stop the spread of the disease. Pretending that getting tested is not helpful in this is stupid.

 

[Althea]

How is a test going to keep Candace from spreading it when she doesn’t support the guidelines? She won’t wear a mask, she didn’t quarantine when her husband had COVID and she refuses to get vaccinated. The woman has the right to reject her business.

Damo is reaching.

 

[Matt Dillon]

If you read the link, there was another site that was suggested to her.

Yeah, something about Texas and a back alley?

 

[Matt Dillon]

No, as Candice points out this service is funded by government, administrators have zero right to refuse service.

Oh, Snap!

 

[Damocles]

I'll bet you are right. Although, it does say that her husband was sick. Given that she doesn't believe in Covid, she probably needed a negative test for an event, as you suggest.

Regardless of the reason, testing will tell her if she is positive and (per this theory) stop her from attending that event, thus aiding in limiting the spread of the disease. Refusing to test on a political basis simply tells folks that even those who are working in testing facilities do not think it is important enough to overcome their political ideological hatred.

 

[Althea]

Understanding you are positive or negative helps stop the spread of the disease. Pretending that getting tested is not helpful in this is stupid.

What's stupid is encouraging your thousands of followers not to get vaccinated, or wear a mask. Anyone who subscribes to that should be assumed positive and kept out of public places.

Further, they should be denied access to medical care WHEN they get sick.

No different than expecting an insurance company to cover your house fire, when you refused to buy insurance.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Oh, Snap!

Candice is going to the mat on this, if she has not already she is taking this to the courts.

 

[Damocles]

How is a test going to keep Candace from spreading it when she doesn’t support the guidelines? She won’t wear a mask, she didn’t quarantine when her husband had COVID and she refuses to get vaccinated. The woman has the right to reject her business.

Whether she doesn't support the guidelines, the event that wants her to test beforehand does.

Pretending that rejecting governmental services for political ideology isn't hypocritical is, as I said before, just jumping into that pool.

I get that you don't like Candace, but if you want to stop the spread of the disease you don't stop anybody from getting tested.

 

[Hawkeye10]

What's stupid is encouraging your thousands of followers not to get vaccinated, or wear a mask. Anyone who subscribes to that should be assumed positive and kept out of public places.

Further, they should be denied access to medical care WHEN they get sick.

No different than expecting an insurance company to cover your house fire, when you refused to buy insurance.

You have failed as a human being.

 

[Althea]

Regardless of the reason, testing will tell her if she is positive and (per this theory) stop her from attending that event, thus aiding in limiting the spread of the disease. Refusing to test on a political basis simply tells folks that even those who are working in testing facilities do not think it is important enough to overcome their political ideological hatred.

Lack of a negative test will stop her from attending the event.

Do you agree with her position re. vaccination/masks?

 

[Phantasmal]

So..Covid testers should be discriminatory on who they test?

They can be, it’s their right as a business to refuse service to her.

 

[Althea]

Whether she doesn't support the guidelines, the event that wants her to test beforehand does.

Pretending that rejecting governmental services for political ideology isn't hypocritical is, as I said before, just jumping into that pool.

I get that you don't like Candace, but if you want to stop the spread of the disease you don't stop anybody from getting tested.

Before the vaccines were available I would agree with you. That's all we had.


Now, vaccination is the way to stop the spread of the disease.

 

[Cypress]

No, as Candice points out this service is funded by government, administrators have zero right to refuse service.

That kind of claim requires a link to a reputable source proving the testing offered by Aspen was paid for by the government.

Candace Owens is in Aspen on business vacation and tried to get test at private downtown facility

https://www.aspentimes.com/news/aspen-company-refuses-to-give-covid-test-to-conservative-activist/