Capitalism isnt the problem but the answer

Hawkeye10 said:
There will likely still be elections,
Click to expand...
Nope. Under the scenario you are describing, governments will merely select government workers who "qualify" to fill positions in Brussels. It will be the exact same process that assigns any government worker to his next job assignment. In his new job assignment in Brussels, he will be "representing" his country administratively and will participate in the bureacracy that churns out the regulations and the tariffs and the fees and the taxes, etc... There will be no process for getting anyone fired. The country in question will simply notify said government worker when his assignment is ending and will choose his replacement. There won't be any elections.
 
IBDaMann said:
Nope. Under the scenario you are describing, governments will merely select government workers who "qualify" to fill positions in Brussels. It will be the exact same process that assigns any government worker to his next job assignment. In his new job assignment in Brussels, he will be "representing" his country administratively and will participate in the bureacracy that churns out the regulations and the tariffs and the fees and the taxes, etc... There will be no process for getting anyone fired. The country in question will simply notify said government worker when his assignment is ending and will choose his replacement. There won't be any elections.
Click to expand...

It is important to give the people the illusion that they have some control as they are enslaved....so there will be elections.
 
Yakuda said:
This article makes a great case for the efficacy and morality of capitalism. Plus it has a hilarious cartoon of that little retarded climate kid, helga

https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/...t-the-problem-but-a-solution-worth-defending/
Click to expand...

Can you name a country, anywhere in the world, who is a great example of Capitalism, who is not also a great example of using Social Programs?

Name 1!

If you can't that's OK, because no one else can either!

NEXT STUPID ASININE THREAD PLEASE!
 
Hawkeye10 said:
It is important to give the people the illusion that they have some control as they are enslaved....so there will be elections.
Click to expand...
I stand corrected. You are right, of course. There will always be the illusion of control, as well as those who gullibly believe that control is real. The struggle will belong to those who realize they have no control and who will try desperately to convince the oblivious others of their misperception. Of course, the government will plant operatives amongst the people and on JPP to pretend to be voices of rational people saying "Everything is fine. We have control. We just need to let our democratic process resolve any problems."

Nonetheless, there will be no way to fire, or otherwise "unelect" someone who has been so appointed to be one of the bureacratic regulators. He will regulate until the government says that he is to move on to another assignment.

That's how the EU works.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
Can you name a country, anywhere in the world, who is a great example of Capitalism, who is not also a great example of using Social Programs?
Click to expand...
I guess it's that time again to mention that logic isn't your strong suit.

Your question, when answered, makes no point. I know you think it does, but it doesn't. The existence of social programs does not somehow render economics invalid.

The typical process you should follow is to first clearly state the point that you believe you are making. Others will tell you if you have any flaws in your logic. If you are avoiding stating any point because you know you don't have any, why bother with making a post in the first place?



Why do leftists work so hard to corner the market on stupid?
 
Apollyon 2023 said:
Capitalism is like a dead herring in the moon light it shines but it stinks.
Click to expand...
Let's correct the wording and see how it sounds:

"Sound economics is like a dead herring in the moon light. It shines but it stinks."

Wow. You're brilliant. I bet you could walk and chew gum at different times.
 
IBDaMann said:
Let's correct the wording and see how it sounds:

"Sound economics is like a dead herring in the moon light. It shines but it stinks."

Wow. You're brilliant. I bet you could walk and chew gum at different times.
Click to expand...

Better than that! I can do your Mom and chew gum at the same time
 
IBDaMann said:
I guess it's that time again to mention that logic isn't your strong suit.

Your question, when answered, makes no point. I know you think it does, but it doesn't. The existence of social programs does not somehow render economics invalid.

The typical process you should follow is to first clearly state the point that you believe you are making. Others will tell you if you have any flaws in your logic. If you are avoiding stating any point because you know you don't have any, why bother with making a post in the first place?



Why do leftists work so hard to corner the market on stupid?
Click to expand...

UBDaIDIOT! AND YOU NEVER FAIL!

Thanks!
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
UBDaIDIOT! AND YOU NEVER FAIL!
Click to expand...
It would seem that neither logic nor writing is your strong suit, and let's not worry about getting you to make any sort of point for the moment. Instead, lets focus on getting you to simply formulate a coherent thought. We won't worry about grammar or punctuation just yet.

Let's try this one: "Air is good." Can you work on that one? (Caution: Don't learn too quickly or the Democrats won't have you)
 
Yakuda said:
But it is a ponzi scheme as early investors are paid off with money put up by later ones. That's the essential element of a ponzi scheme. That's what makes a ponzi scheme a ponzi scheme. And beyond that it's a lousy investment which is separate from whether or not it's a ponzi scheme. Which it is.

Then we can agree that something can be true regardless of all evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

A Ponzi scheme is an ILLEGAL scheme...a fraudulent investment scheme. Social Security IS NOT a Ponzi scheme. It is not illegal or fraudulent.

Let's agree on that...and then move on.
 
AssHatZombie said:
it's a proclamation on what they plan on doing.

you should listen, shit jockey.
Click to expand...

When you wrote, "is that a threat from Klaus Schwab?"...

...I took it to be a question of whether I got what you considered to be "my threat" from Klaus Schwab.

My response was framed in that context.

Why don't you get someone to write your comments in full sentences for you.
 
Frank Apisa said:
When you wrote, "is that a threat from Klaus Schwab?"...

...I took it to be a question of whether I got what you considered to be "my threat" from Klaus Schwab.

My response was framed in that context.

Why don't you get someone to write your comments in full sentences for you.
Click to expand...

dick you eat much gladly....
 
The top 28 industrial countries, except one, have universal healthcare. It is no gift. It is cheaper than our system and better. They also have support programs for those who need them. They are not judgemental like Americans. It comes from the tax base. It is not free. However, the happiness quotient in those countries is higher than ours.
We could do better.
 
Frank Apisa said:
The object of an insurance company is to make money...for the shareholders and the executives.
Click to expand...
Yes, but you're not done. You've said nothing thus far. Everybody wants to make money because everybody needs resources. You need resources and you try to get them. Now you need to explain how the insurance company decides to go about making money. This is where you get to make some sort of point.

The floor is yours.

Frank Apisa said:
Some CEO's of insurance companies make over 20,000,000 per year...and dividends of some insurance companies are HUGE compared even with that.
Click to expand...
Your point must be that some CEOs are very smart. You should just come right out and write that.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes, but you're not done. You've said nothing thus far. Everybody wants to make money because everybody needs resources. You need resources and you try to get them. Now you need to explain how the insurance company decides to go about making money. This is where you get to make some sort of point.

The floor is yours.


Your point must be that some CEOs are very smart. You should just come right out and write that.
Click to expand...

That is not the point. As most Americans do, you equate money with intelligence. Does the exec get smarter every time he gets a raise? Insurance companies do not provide health care. they meter it out with a vigilant eye on profits. They fight providing you the care you paid for. I just looked it up. There is a 6-step process to try and get them to pay. They make the rules.
What is their product? What do they make? They provide nothing but cost and complexity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top