Catholic school vice principal dismissed for being in gay "marriage"

Should religious schools be allowed to fire gays?

  • Is the Pope Catholic?

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No, the federal government should step in

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, it's discrimination; the school should lose tax-exempt status

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • So what if a teacher is gay? What could happen?

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .
Read the 1st amendment.....

The First does not prohibit taxation of religious institutions. In fact an argument can be made that if the Fed taxes anyone, they cant give religious institutions special treatment simply for being religious institutions.
 
Interesting question.

Does committing a theft make one a thief?

A homo act is not the only requirement to defines a homosexual.....a homo must meet the requirement of being attracted to only the same sex as the homo.

Stealing is the only requirement needed to define a thief.
 
The First does not prohibit taxation of religious institutions. In fact an argument can be made that if the Fed taxes anyone, they cant give religious institutions special treatment simply for being religious institutions.

Does the IRS ever review the tax-exempt status of organizations who are deemed to have denied civil rights to employees?
 
A homo act is not the only requirement to defines a homosexual.....a homo must meet the requirement of being attracted to only the same sex as the homo. Stealing is the only requirement needed to define a thief.

So if a gay man molests a boy, he is a homosexual, but the boy is not?
 
Would the act be accurately described as "homosexual" if both participants were of the same sex, Counselor?

I did not say your statement was inaccurate, I said part of it was irrelevant to the discussion. Now, you have gone forward with an effort to try to prove it was true.

True and relevant are two different things. Look it up.
 
So if a gay man molests a boy, he is a homosexual, but the boy is not?

you stipulated he is a gay man to start, then of course he is a homosexual.


Is #2 a serious question ?....Would you call victim of rape a rapist ? A mugging victim a mugger ?
 
I did not say your statement was inaccurate, I said part of it was irrelevant to the discussion. Now, you have gone forward with an effort to try to prove it was true.

True and relevant are two different things. Look it up.


Yeah, birth control "MEDICINE' and birth control "CONTRACEPTIVE" is two different things too, jughead...look it up.
 
I did not say your statement was inaccurate, I said part of it was irrelevant to the discussion. Now, you have gone forward with an effort to try to prove it was true. True and relevant are two different things. Look it up.

I'm establishing precedent, Counselor.
 
Is there any authoritative source whose opinion you'd take under consideration? This is a serious question, I'm not being snarky.

"Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men[SUP]2[/SUP] is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation."

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

Again you are splitting hairs in attempt to keep any association of homosexuals with pedophelia. Can't push the gay agenda with the stigma of pedophelia attached to you.

As I said pedophelia and homosexuality are not mutually exclusive.
 
Back
Top