Catholic school vice principal dismissed for being in gay "marriage"

Should religious schools be allowed to fire gays?

  • Is the Pope Catholic?

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No, the federal government should step in

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, it's discrimination; the school should lose tax-exempt status

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • So what if a teacher is gay? What could happen?

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .
Is there any authoritative source whose opinion you'd take under consideration? This is a serious question, I'm not being snarky.

"Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men[SUP]2[/SUP] is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation."

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html



"Male-male" sounds so much more gay-friendly, doesn't it?
 
What percentage of their assailants were male?

From the same wiki article I quoted before.
"The 2004 John Jay Report was based on a study of 10,667 allegations against 4,392 priests accused of engaging in sexual abuse of a minor between 1950 and 2002."

Allegations?

You asked what percentage of their assailants were male. I pointed out that, per the link, the survey was concerning catholic priests. Since that is what we were discussing, I thought it covered it quite nicely.
 
You asked what percentage of their assailants were male. I pointed out that, per the link, the survey was concerning catholic priests. Since that is what we were discussing, I thought it covered it quite nicely.

Allegations = percentage of assailants?

I thought you prefer to stick with accurate assessments.
 
Allegations = percentage of assailants?

I thought you prefer to stick with accurate assessments.

No, I did not say "allegations = percentage of assailants". But you asked what percentage of the 81% were molested by males. Since the study concerned only catholic priests, I thought it was self-explanatory.
 
Back
Top