uh. They do. A fact is nothing more than an assumed predicate. As soon as someone in a conversation no longer assumes that predicate it ceases to be a fact. It becomes an argument.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'universal truth' or 'proof'.
It won’t change my decision to eat there. My comment was directed at leftists. I truly hate them. I know that isn’t Christian but I hate them
I no longer feel sorry when something bad befalls a leftist
Agreed. Just wondering why leftists would oppose an organization that helps the poor
Are leftists that morally bankrupt
FUCK YOU!
PROVIDE A LINK
ITS THE GOD DAMNED RULE SHIT BREATH
you never did evil fuck
hating gay people is evil
shove your chicken sandwich up you fat flabby ass
IF CHRISTIANITY IS TURNED INTO A HATE MACHINE BY YOU RACISTS AND HATERS THEN YES PEOPLE WILL LOSE RESPECT FOR CHRISTIANITY
The poor you have always with you -while you keep stealing from them. Best to end capitalism, kid.
Once upon a time, in some areas, possibly. Here the capitalist have been trying to kill us off since 1910 on. It didn't make us love their system much.
2+2 = 4, and always will, whether you assume the predicate or not.
By definition, it does mean proof.
Only if you assume certain predicates:
1) You are using the axioms that define mathematics.
2) You are using the base 10 numbering system.
A predicate is not a proof. Circular argument fallacy.
I'm using facts. Facts are proof by definition.
Fucking retard.
Facts are not a proof. Circular argument fallacy.
Capitalism is not theft. It does not steal from anyone. Socialism is theft.
Capitalism creates wealth. Socialism can only exist by stealing wealth.
Vilifying Capitalism or Socialism is a waste of time. It doesn't address the practical issues.
There will be both public and private sectors no matter who runs the government.
We simply need to become far more progressive as to where we draw the lines.
You should take that up with the definition of "fact".