Chris Wallace slams Trump for his ‘disturbing’ demand to prosecute NYT op-ed writer

lol.....you think an anonymous letter to the editor is "information".........

of course, it is. Are you bothered because he did not identify himself? How would that make it more factual? Even you have to admit it would not. The message stands. It meshes with what many others have said. I bet you know the Federalist Papers that Kavanaugh kept referring to were written anonymously. Later we found out that Publius, their pseudonym, was actually Hamilton, Madison and Jay. there is a long history of political use of pseudonyms, Like Franklln writing poor Richards almanac.. I have no problem with a person writing it in secret, especially when dealing with an emotional nightmare like Trump. The NYT knows who he is.
 
of course, it is. Are you bothered because he did not identify himself? How would that make it more factual? Even you have to admit it would not. The message stands. It meshes with what many others have said. I bet you know the Federalist Papers that Kavanaugh kept referring to were written anonymously. Later we found out that Publius, their pseudonym, was actually Hamilton, Madison and Jay. there is a long history of political use of pseudonyms, Like Franklln writing poor Richards almanac.. I have no problem with a person writing it in secret, especially when dealing with an emotional nightmare like Trump. The NYT knows who he is.

in a few weeks you'll be wondering why you were stupid enough to fall for it..........
 
in a few weeks you'll be wondering why you were stupid enough to fall for it..........

Why? You have been a solid wrong poster from the beginning to now. The anonymous letter corroborates with many insider stories. It does not have to stand alone. Trump has broomed or lost a third of his appointees in a year and a half. He has been called idiot and moron by those he appointed who had the terrible experience of working with him. Trump is tour religion. You close out everything said about him that shows he is a dangerous clown.. Just deny, deny, deny and pat yourself on the back for being conned so well and thoroughly. People like you are dangerous to the country.
 
Last edited:
So Trump does not believe in freedom of the press. He thinks he is above criticism and if an article criticizes him, the paper should be put under scrutiny. Yeah, forget the free press. It should be under Trump's control. Do you rightys understand what a huge thing this is? The first amendment codifies the free press. It does not protect trump from his crimes. Nor does it mean the press should be controlled by the administration. We have not faced this level of threat since Nixon. Wonder what happened to him?
 
sure.....and Hilliary never lied about Benghazi......

The Repubs investigated Benghazi about 8 times. If she lied, the REPUBLICAN house or the REPUBLICAN sente would have charbroiled her. Can't you understand, they had all the power possible and found nothing. Absolutely nothing. They had Repubs chairiing the investigations. They called the shots, chose who would be interviewed and conducted the whole process. So you are correct, Hillay did not lie about Bengjhazi. So we agree,.
 
really?......tell me something I have been wrong about?......

How about this whole subject. you think wrongly that unless the letter writer named himself, what he said was wrong. Really? that makes sense to you. So if he comes out and admits who he is, then you would admit that his letter was correct? Or can you again not follow simple logic.
 
The Repubs investigated Benghazi about 8 times. If she lied, the REPUBLICAN house or the REPUBLICAN sente would have charbroiled her. Can't you understand, they had all the power possible and found nothing. Absolutely nothing. They had Repubs chairiing the investigations. They called the shots, chose who would be interviewed and conducted the whole process. So you are correct, Hillay did not lie about Bengjhazi. So we agree,.

thanks for proving you will never admit that she lied when she said that Benghazi was the result of a YouTube video........want to listen to her doing it again?.......I've only posted it here twenty times.......
 
How about this whole subject. you think wrongly that unless the letter writer named himself, what he said was wrong. Really? that makes sense to you. So if he comes out and admits who he is, then you would admit that his letter was correct? Or can you again not follow simple logic.

when he comes out and admits who he is I will be laughing about how stupid you were.......
 
thanks for proving you will never admit that she lied when she said that Benghazi was the result of a YouTube video........want to listen to her doing it again?.......I've only posted it here twenty times.......

Simply exactly what everyone thought in the beginning. I know I did because it had created several attacks in the previous days. You rightys of course label it lie. It made perfect sense.Post it hundreds more, nothing changes. Who did not think tht ?
 
thanks for proving you will never admit that she lied when she said that Benghazi was the result of a YouTube video........want to listen to her doing it again?.......I've only posted it here twenty times.......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack#Investigations



The findings of the two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee, the fifth of six Republican investigations, was summarized by the Associated Press on November 21, 2014:[255]
A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
 
Back
Top