Civil War

So we can expect peace and quiet from you while I allow you to stew in your ignorance? Thank you.
Yes. It's clear that repeatedly putting you in a position to answer questions that you don't want to, and can't, answer is not enough to get you to recognize the depth of your of crazy.
 
Yes. It's clear that repeatedly putting you in a position to answer questions
Pivot. You are the one who is supposed to be supporting his affirmative claims and religious beliefs. I am an atheist so I have no religious beliefs that I am asserting. I am not the one asserting Climate Change.

You have failed to support your positions. You have failed to support your apparent physics violations. You have done nothing but blame me for your stupid religious faith in which you are evidently ashamed.
 
Pivot. You are the one who is supposed to be supporting his affirmative claims and religious beliefs. I am an atheist so I have no religious beliefs that I am asserting. I am not the one asserting Climate Change.

You have failed to support your positions. You have failed to support your apparent physics violations. You have done nothing but blame me for your stupid religious faith in which you are evidently ashamed.
I can't explain things to people who don't understand the basics of what I'm explaining and/or are science deniers and/or conspiracy theorists.
 
I can't explain things to people who don't understand the basics of what I'm explaining and/or are science deniers and/or conspiracy theorists.
The raving straightjacketed psychopath similarly cannot explain the "basics" of his spittle-throwing frothing at the mouth. You are still scientifically illiterate and your religion is still stupid.
 
That's your label,
No, Void. It's THE label.
based on a list of incorrect assumptions
The 1st law of thermodynamics, which you ignore, is not an incorrect assumption. It is a theory of science.
and conspiracy theories.
Science is not a conspiracy, Void.
Your irrational
He's not being irrational here. Fallacy fallacy.
beliefs don't change the fact that there are plenty of scientific areas of study that interact with climate science.
There is no such thing as 'climate science'.
Correct. Atmosphere has no religion.

Sure. You can do whatever you want in your own mind.

Which changes nothing about the fact that the science behind climate change,
There is no science of 'climate change'. Climate cannot change.
and more specifically global warming due to so-called green house gases,
You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
has been studied since the 18th century...long before you and your crazy conspiracy theories came into existence.
The 1st law of thermodynamics is not a conspiracy.
 
I'll try again.... there are characteristics associated with different climate types. Those characteristics are things like temperature, humidity, rainfall, etc. Those items are objectively measured.
Climate has no temperature. Climate has no humidity. Climate has no rain gauge. Climate is not an objective word.
You continued avoidance and word games are noted.
Inversion fallacy.
Yes, that's my approach.
I agree. Word games and inversions are your approach.
 
Climate science exists.
No such thing.
I know this because Trump, by his own admission, just fired them.
Trump didn't fire a buzzword.
You don't understand what climate is,
He does.
which is why you can't describe different climates.
He can.
Because of that, you don't understand how climate change is believed to work,
Climate cannot change.
hence continually misapplying laws of thermodynamics that don't change anything about the science behind climate change.
There is no science of 'climate change'. Climate cannot change. The laws of thermodynamics, which you ignore, apply all the time, everywhere.

Educate yourself on the basics and then we can continue.
 
Back
Top