Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump

Almost as bad as Obama having US Intellegence assets spying on the Trump campaign for the DNC.

When is someone going to prison for these actions ?

When they are charged with a crime, indicted and found guilty. That's the way our legal system works. It's called Due Process. Look it up, Gomer.
 
When they are charged with a crime, indicted and found guilty. That's the way our legal system works. It's called Due Process. Look it up, Gomer.

Like you ever gave a shit about that in the Trump era, shit for brains. Podesta, Comey, Strzok et al are all in the frame along with your heroine Shrillary.

You were one of the worst offenders, so it's fucking hilarious seeing you desperately trying to walk your bullshit back now!!
 
Last edited:

The funny thing is there is nothing new in Durham's filing. We already knew that it was the DNS records that raised questions as to why the server in Trump tower was contacting Russia. The only thing the filing does is try to say the lawyers have a conflict of interest. I find it interesting that Durham is trying to prevent his indictment from going to trial by making such claims.
Having the DNS records is not an infiltration of Trump Tower. They used scraped data from the net to figure out that Trump IPs were attempting to contact Russian IPs. Anyone can do a reverse IP lookup if you have the IPs.
 
"GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio said former President Donald Trump's statement in which he suggested executing Hillary Clinton campaign aides was "right on target" on Sunday.

Jordan, a staunch Trump ally, was reacting to the 45th president's Saturday statement on a new court filing by the special counsel John Durham, reported by Fox News.

The filing said that former aides to Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign paid a tech company to access servers belonging to Trump Tower and afterward the Trump White House in an effort to find links to Russia.

In his Saturday statement, Trump said the filing "provides indisputable evidence" that the Clinton team spied on his campaign and presidency "in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia."
https://buzzadm.com/2022/02/14/trump-statement-suggesting-executions-right-on-target/
 
Former Director of National Intelligence has told John Durham there is 'enough evidence to indict MULTIPLE people' in the Trump-Russia probe following revelation Hillary's campaign 'paid people to SPY on him while he was President'

• John Ratcliffe told Special Counsel John Durham that there is 'enough evidence' to indict 'multiple people' connected to the origins of the Trump-Russia probe
• The former Director of National Intelligence met with Durham more than once
• Ratcliffe's pointed Durham to a declassified CIA memo of Clinton approving looking into Trump's Russia ties as a way of distracting from her email scandal
• The report was sent directly to then FBI Director James Comey and then-Deputy Assistant Director of • Counterintelligence Peter Strzok
• New bombshell reports now reveal Clinton paid people to hack servers at Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign and White House servers following the election
• A poll taken before those reports came out show that now even Democrats want Clinton questioned over her role in the Russian secret server scandal
• 44% of party loyalists believed she should be interrogated last October, but the number jumped to 66% in a January polling

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ndict-MULTIPLE-people-Trump-Russia-probe.html

Will the Hildabeast be indicted...I hope so.

She should already have been in jail for releasing top secret documents.
 
WOW. WAY TO NOT REBUT A SINGLE SYLLABLE OF WHAT HE POSTED.

DID YOU NOT READ THE FILING...IN FEDERAL COURT???

THE SLEAZOCRATS (HILLARY CAMPAIGN) PAID TO HAVE THE OPPOSITION PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, AND THEN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ,ILLEGALLY SPIED UPON...TO CREATE A LIE, AS PART OF A SEDITIOUS CONSOPIRACY TO UNDO AN ELECION.


IT'S ONLY TREASON...THAT'S ALL.

They funny thing is is that Durham never claims they illegally spied upon anyone. He merely claims that there is a conflict of interest for the lawyers because they previously represented the tech company provided services to the EOP. He never once states they did anything illegal let alone that they illegally spied. In fact Durham can't make any such claim unless he files an indictment claiming they violated an actual law. The mere fact that you and the RW idiots are jumping on this raises questions about Durham's filing which is only supposed to include facts and not be prejudicial. The prejudicial nature of how it is being taken raises ethical questions of how and why Durham made this filing.

The question is, did you read the filing? I would bet you didn't. The part that the RW fools are up in arms over doesn't allege any criminal activity. Rather it is just a factual recount of what they say existed prior to Sussman's discussion with the FBI. It is a basis for trying to claim Sussman lied about not having any clients, not that there was illegal spying going on.
 
Lock her up (sic).

In his Saturday statement, Trump said the filing "provides indisputable evidence" that the Clinton team spied on his campaign and presidency "in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia."
 
.

Isn't this just a modern version of the Watergate break-in?

Trump accuses Hillary Clinton campaign of TREASON after Special Counsel John Durham said they paid tech firm to hack into his White House and Trump Tower servers to find Russia links

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...filtrate-Trump-Tower-White-House-servers.html

If the Watergate break in had been some guys standing outside taking pictures of who went into the Watergate then it might be comparable.
The Dailymail article is ridiculous since there is nothing in the filing that comes close to claiming that any servers were infiltrated.
 
Former Director of National Intelligence has told John Durham there is 'enough evidence to indict MULTIPLE people' in the Trump-Russia probe following revelation Hillary's campaign 'paid people to SPY on him while he was President'

• John Ratcliffe told Special Counsel John Durham that there is 'enough evidence' to indict 'multiple people' connected to the origins of the Trump-Russia probe
• The former Director of National Intelligence met with Durham more than once
• Ratcliffe's pointed Durham to a declassified CIA memo of Clinton approving looking into Trump's Russia ties as a way of distracting from her email scandal
• The report was sent directly to then FBI Director James Comey and then-Deputy Assistant Director of • Counterintelligence Peter Strzok
• New bombshell reports now reveal Clinton paid people to hack servers at Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign and White House servers following the election
• A poll taken before those reports came out show that now even Democrats want Clinton questioned over her role in the Russian secret server scandal
• 44% of party loyalists believed she should be interrogated last October, but the number jumped to 66% in a January polling

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ndict-MULTIPLE-people-Trump-Russia-probe.html

John Ratcliffe makes up some shit and tells it to the Daily Mail.
Primevera believes the stuff John Ratcliffe made up is true.

There is no evidence of anyone hacking Trump's servers. Collecting DNS data on web traffic is NOT hacking someone else's server. Durham has never once to my knowledge alleged that any Trump servers were hacked.

Then we have the issue of a 5 year statute of limitations with the majority of Federal crimes. It is now 2022. Unless they can indict for a conspiracy to defraud the US government (which has a 10 year statute of limitations) no one can be indicted for alleged crimes in 2016.
 
Yeah, if you believe alleged, claimed, attest, assert, and accused proves guilty, apparently Fox does, but then again, they often report innuendo as facts

Stupid fucker, you were one of the worst offenders regarding Durham. Obviously you are totally incapable of being fair and balanced, it's just not in you!
 
They funny thing is is that Durham never claims they illegally spied upon anyone. He merely claims that there is a conflict of interest for the lawyers because they previously represented the tech company provided services to the EOP. He never once states they did anything illegal let alone that they illegally spied. In fact Durham can't make any such claim unless he files an indictment claiming they violated an actual law. The mere fact that you and the RW idiots are jumping on this raises questions about Durham's filing which is only supposed to include facts and not be prejudicial. The prejudicial nature of how it is being taken raises ethical questions of how and why Durham made this filing.

The question is, did you read the filing? I would bet you didn't. The part that the RW fools are up in arms over doesn't allege any criminal activity. Rather it is just a factual recount of what they say existed prior to Sussman's discussion with the FBI. It is a basis for trying to claim Sussman lied about not having any clients, not that there was illegal spying going on.

Thank you Richard Saunders for clarifying everything. The far right doesn't care if Durham never claims they illegally spied upon anyone. They know the TrumpTards won't read it or understand it so they just throw it out there with a sexy title hoping their minions will swallow it. And many do. A large majority of TrumpTards only read the story title and run with it. That's all they're capable of doing. Oh, and lying more about it. I hope we never turn into a country where the party that lies the best wins the elections.
That would suck but it seems the far right thinks that's the only way they can win.

funny_redneck_crazy_face_animated_gif_by_bensib-d4is1um.gif
 
Yeah, if you believe alleged, claimed, attest, assert, and accused proves guilty, apparently Fox does, but then again, they often report innuendo as facts

Yes, FoxNews does this a lot. Why? Because their listeners don't know the difference between innuendo and facts. Just look at all the far right posters on this forum who try to claim speculation, innuendo, conjecture is proof. Many are still trying to claim the 2020 election was fraudulent with absolutely zero proof (that's proof as designated by a court of law, not the far right media). It's sad. It really is.
 
Bungling Biden's National Security Advisor Played Key Role in the Russian Hoax

ebe96d57-cdf2-4592-81c7-a1941d13edc9-870x435.jpg


JAKE THE SNAKE SULLIVAN SLITHERS WITH THE HILDEBEAST




https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/02/14/bidens-national-security-advisor-pushed-trumprussia-server-connection-n2603257
 
Back
Top