Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump

Yes, FoxNews does this a lot. Why? Because their listeners don't know the difference between innuendo and facts. Just look at all the far right posters on this forum who try to claim speculation, innuendo, conjecture is proof. Many are still trying to claim the 2020 election was fraudulent with absolutely zero proof (that's proof as designated by a court of law, not the far right media). It's sad. It really is.

I bet it sucks that the source is not Fox but the Congressional investigation into the wrongdoings of the 2016 election and the demmycunt interference with the political process......
 
Yeah, if you believe alleged, claimed, attest, assert, and accused proves guilty, apparently Fox does, but then again, they often report innuendo as facts

I believe that's what your position was on the Mueller report, even when the repost disproved everything you claimed......
 
When they are charged with a crime, indicted and found guilty. That's the way our legal system works. It's called Due Process. Look it up, Gomer.

says the fucking idiot who's been claiming Trump is a criminal for the last five years........it may be the way our legal system works but it certainly isn't the way the demmycunts have been working the last five years.......
 
Stupid fucker, you were one of the worst offenders regarding Durham. Obviously you are totally incapable of being fair and balanced, it's just not in you!

Wait a minute, you actual think that the Daily Mail, Ratcliffe, John Durham, Fox, and the other Murdoch sources that have been cited in this thread are "fair and balanced?" Are you really that naïve, or just drunk on the Kool Aid
 
Wait a minute, you actual think that the Daily Mail, Ratcliffe, John Durham, Fox, and the other Murdoch sources that have been cited in this thread are "fair and balanced?" Are you really that naïve, or just drunk on the Kool Aid

certainly they are more reliable than the demmycrat press....
 
Back
Top