Clinton Foundation going bankrupt

Teflon Don said:
Why do you think the Clinton Foundation is no longer drawing donations like it did when Hillary was running for President?

Is it just a coincidence that donations have dried up since she lost to Donald Trump?

Where have Bill’s $500,000 speaking engagements gone?
Click to expand...

a lack of influence cannot be bought......
 
Teflon Don said:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6549930-Clinton-Foundation-2018-990.html

The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in 2018, according to newly released tax records

This is the second consecutive year of losses incurred by the organization.

The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million, including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the alleged "charity." They had expenses of $47.5 million which resulted in a net loss of $16.8 million.

The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of $16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in November 2016.


Allow me to respond for our fellow leftists

1) Can't you get over the Clintons?
2) Yeah but Trump
3) Yeah, they released their tax returns

Of course none of them will point out that the Foundation was nothing more than a giant QUID PRO QUO. It was a slush fund as long as people thought Hillary could be President
Click to expand...


You're one of the stupidest liars on the planet
 
Ass Zombie is taking great pleasure in a charity that does a lot of good across the world may be in trouble. He is hoping it closes. That tells you a lot about him. what a kind and caring person. perhaps trump can take it over. there is still plenty to loot.
 
Into the Night said:
The bad housing investments just before the Crash were rated AAA as well. Shows how well THAT rating works!
Click to expand...

Those were fixed because the banks had bribed and pressured the rating agencies. They were connected in business. The charity ratings are not. They are separate from the charities.
 
Teflon Don said:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6549930-Clinton-Foundation-2018-990.html

The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in 2018, according to newly released tax records

This is the second consecutive year of losses incurred by the organization.

The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million, including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the alleged "charity." They had expenses of $47.5 million which resulted in a net loss of $16.8 million.

The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of $16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in November 2016.


Allow me to respond for our fellow leftists

1) Can't you get over the Clintons?
2) Yeah but Trump
3) Yeah, they released their tax returns

Of course none of them will point out that the Foundation was nothing more than a giant QUID PRO QUO. It was a slush fund as long as people thought Hillary could be President
Click to expand...

Fake news
 
Nordberg said:
Those were fixed because the banks had bribed and pressured the rating agencies. They were connected in business. The charity ratings are not. They are separate from the charities.
Click to expand...

Ooo...you ARE reaching to paint your way out of THAT corner, aren't you?

Compositional error fallacy.
 
Here's the thing, Teflon Don. If you think that you're dissing progressive liberals by putting down the Clintons, you're wasting your time.

The Clintons are Republicans-Lite. We only voted for them because they were running against real Republicans.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Here's the thing, Teflon Don. If you think that you're dissing progressive liberals by putting down the Clintons, you're wasting your time.

The Clintons are Republicans-Lite. We only voted for them because they were running against real Republicans.
Click to expand...

so are you for standing up to china to maintain jobs for americans?

if not, maybe you're republican lite. trumps china policy is a clear deviation from neocon globalist corporatist horseshit that rethugs are steeped in.
 
Last edited:
AssHatZombie said:
so are you for standing up to china to maintain jobs for americans?
Click to expand...

Prior to Trump, it was Democrats in organized labor that were the protectionists, NOT Republicans.

Opening the door to China started the flood, but what exists now is what exists now. Trump's trade war isn't saving American jobs. If it actually were, I would support it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top