Clinton Foundation going bankrupt

NiftyNiblick said:
Prior to Trump, it was Democrats in organized labor that were the protectionists, NOT Republicans.

Opening the door to China started the flood, but what exists now is what exists now. Trump's trade war isn't saving American jobs. If it actually were, I would support it.
Click to expand...

were they? was bill clinton protectionist? is hillary?

trumps policy is having some effect. how could this be more effectively dealt with?

globalization is A bipartisan mind virus.
 
midcan5 said:
OMG the Clintons again and again. The groupthink of the right wing in America is astounding, they are like parakeets who repeat the right wing talking points ad nauseam. Is it any wonder Trump wants fictions created on Biden too? When your fans and snowflakes follow so easily, your work is simple. Come on children grow up, Trump is playing you and you are singing his tune.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?81925-Keep-Tweeting-Donald-America
Click to expand...

you fucks let the clintons take over the dnc and screw bernerd.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
No, Democrats of means are citizens of the world, culturally. Pro-union Democrats like myself, however, have always favored protectionism in the past.

The China trade war in modern times just isn't working as intended.
Click to expand...

but you agree with even trying right? an actual populist dem could beat trump. bernie could have beaten trump.
 
Into the Night said:
Ooo...you ARE reaching to paint your way out of THAT corner, aren't you?

Compositional error fallacy.
Click to expand...

Nope, it is actually a fact. I understand that was before your time and you did not watch the congressional hearings where they exposed those connections. I am sure your right-wing sources do not cover it fairly. But don't blurt our right-wing talking points without doing some homework. You are wrong again. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg51103/html/CHRG-110hhrg51103.htm From 2000 to 2007 Moody's profits and business quadrupled. They were getting rich by "properly" rating securities and properties.
 
Last edited:
Nordberg said:
Nope, it is actually a fact.
Click to expand...
Not a fact. An argument. Learn what 'fact' means.
Nordberg said:
I understand that was before your time
Click to expand...
Nope. I lived through it.
Nordberg said:
and you did not watch the congressional hearings where they exposed those connections.
Click to expand...
I watched Congress try to cover their butt, yes.
Nordberg said:
I am sure your right-wing sources do not cover it fairly.
Click to expand...
I do not use 'right wing' or 'left wing' sources.
Nordberg said:
But don't blurt our right-wing talking points without doing some homework.
Click to expand...
I do not use 'right wing talking points'. I make my own arguments, and I present the reasoning for them.
Nordberg said:
You are wrong again. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg51103/html/CHRG-110hhrg51103.htm
Click to expand...
False authority fallacy.
Nordberg said:
From 2000 to 2007 Moody's profits and business quadrupled.
Click to expand...
That is true for several businesses during that time.
Nordberg said:
They were getting rich by "properly" rating securities and properties.
Click to expand...
No, by improperly rating securities and properties.

What makes you think ratings of charities are any different?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top