CNN Enhances Zimmerman 911 Tape Again, Sounds like F**king Cold...

Minorities being bigoted at all has been denied so many times by the typical lefty on this board, its odd to see someone actually claim otherwise........

Darla makes herself judge and jury and wont' entertain any other claims except what the left wingers say......her mind was made up without the benefit of any factual information, except a black kid was killed by a white Hispanic....
Enhanced audio was wonderful just a few days ago and now its bullshit when its shown he didn't use a slur....
Eyewitness testimony don't matter.....
Video that DON'T show something is taken a proof of something thats not visible.....

You both make up bullshit and tell us your opinions as if you were actually there and saw what happened with your own eyes.....

No matter what happens, the liberals are convinced that Zimmerman is guilty and deserves to be lynched.
The Police Department reports could be released and if they support Zimmerman, liberals are going to say that the this is proof that the Police Department is racist.
Witness testimoney could be released and if they support Zimmerman, liberals are going to say that the witness is racist and that they must be friends of Zimmerman.
First responder reports could be released and if they support Zimmermans comments, liberals are going to say that they're just supporting the Police reports; because the first respondrs are probably afraid to tell the truth.
It's not going to matter what eveidence comes forth; but if it supports Zimmerman, it's going to be dismissed and cry's of racism will be heard.

A Grand Jury could investigate this and if they decide that Zimmerman should not be charged., liberals are going to say that it's because the Grand Jury had to be all white.
Then if it's revealed that there were blacks and hispanics on the Grand Jury, then they'll be denounced as ract traitors, oreos, and house niggers.
The Supreme Court could review the evidence and if there decision is that Zimmerman is not guilty of anything, liberals are then going to argue what the meaning of "is" is.

This is the same as the LaCross team that was accused.
 
then claimed they had a reasonable fear of danger. You know what the funny thing is? Women often do have a reasonable fear of danger.


All you need is a reasonable amount of circumstantial proof you were in danger.....

I think if an eyewitness to your danger testified you were on your back getting you head beat on the ground, that would qualify.....

Not unless you're black and/or a woman. :palm:
 
Good list....funny

Right, we don't know....thats why I'm not judge and jury on this case.....
Lets not mis-state the facts......he was not told "not to follow him".....he was told, "he didn't have to".....thats two completely different things.....

The rest of your statement is correct as far as know.....and actually confirmed by Zimmerman....he too said he lost Martin and was returning to his car.....

I wonder how a guy with a gun can get beaten if he knows an attack is coming.....in my world, that don't make sense.....in my world, the attacker never gets that close, without getting shot someplace.....therefore, the only thing left is, he was surprised....my opinion, no proof at all....

I would disagree with your idea that a victims responsibility is to not get close enough to be attacked.....if, of course, its possible....and especially for a women...
Its utterly stupid to get close enough to get punched or overpowered in any fashion....

That should be the potential victims first and foremost defense.....keep you distance from any physical confrontation....

"Lets not mis-state the facts......he was not told "not to follow him".....he was told, "he didn't have to".....thats two completely different things....."

Now, let's add in that there is no proof that Zimmerman continused to follow Martin, after the operator explained to him that he didn't have to do that.
 
No matter what happens, the liberals are convinced that Zimmerman is guilty and deserves to be lynched.
The Police Department reports could be released and if they support Zimmerman, liberals are going to say that the this is proof that the Police Department is racist.
Witness testimoney could be released and if they support Zimmerman, liberals are going to say that the witness is racist and that they must be friends of Zimmerman.
First responder reports could be released and if they support Zimmermans comments, liberals are going to say that they're just supporting the Police reports; because the first respondrs are probably afraid to tell the truth.
It's not going to matter what eveidence comes forth; but if it supports Zimmerman, it's going to be dismissed and cry's of racism will be heard.

A Grand Jury could investigate this and if they decide that Zimmerman should not be charged., liberals are going to say that it's because the Grand Jury had to be all white.
Then if it's revealed that there were blacks and hispanics on the Grand Jury, then they'll be denounced as ract traitors, oreos, and house niggers.
The Supreme Court could review the evidence and if there decision is that Zimmerman is not guilty of anything, liberals are then going to argue what the meaning of "is" is.

This is the same as the LaCross team that was accused.

Excellent observation......

I'll predict that if all you say comes to pass, Jesse and Al will hold "Rave On for Trayvon" rallies, and beat the drums of unrest. ... race riots demanding justice for Trayvon will break out.....
conveniently in close proximity to stores carrying big, flat screen TVs , liquor stores and other goodie stores, and we can watch the loot being carried down the streets
to well deserving minority homes....bringing justice for Trayvon


"If its the truth, it ain't racist"-Poet
 
Excellent observation......

I'll predict that if all you say comes to pass, Jesse and Al will hold "Rave On for Trayvon" rallies, and beat the drums of unrest. ... race riots demanding justice for Trayvon will break out.....
conveniently in close proximity to stores carrying big, flat screen TVs , liquor stores and other goodie stores, and we can watch the loot being carried down the streets
to well deserving minority homes....bringing justice for Trayvon


"If its the truth, it ain't racist"-Poet

:hand:
 
You mean like the ongoing "who did what war" with Poet?

no USF....i thought you were brighter than this...

talking about people's personal information, eg, calling him by his name that he posted etc....

why in the fuck are people so obsessed with the personal information of others? don't be like tom.
 
Nonsense. He's following somebody he doesn't know in the capacity of Neighborhood Watch in a community that had some ridiculous number of unsolved robberies in the last year.
All these facts being the same, if a cop saw him in a neighborhood with a ridiculous number of unsolved robberies and initiated a stop for that reason, he would have no probable cause. The fact that GZ does not know him does not give rise to a belief that he is about to commit a crime or has committed a crime. The fact that he does not know him gives him LESS reason, not more to be suspicious. If he had seen him in the neighborhood repeatedly, consistent with times that robberies were committed he might have some suspicions. But to see someone you don't know, black and wearing a hoodie and become suspicious? Why? Was it the hoodie, lots of kids AND adults wear hoodies. GZ saw a black kid and became suspicious. Was it overt racism or unconscious? Who knows? Even Jessie Jackson admitted that when he was walking down the street and someone was walking behind him he would be relieved that it was not a young black man. Stereotype become ingrained, and as Jessie Jackson shows, the stereotypes are not reserved to just white people. All I know, is that if a young black man shot George Zimmerman, then claimed self defense, there would be a hell of a lot more investigation than there has been in this case.
 
Back
Top