CNN: Judge rules Fanny stays on the case!

ExpressLane said:
The Georgia legislature is STILL investigating Fani and they have subpoena power. Fani and Wade had THOUSANDS of text messages before THEY say they started dating. It will be interesting to see what those texts say.
Click to expand...

Yes we all know they will run a Jim Comer, Jim Jordan type investigation where they find NOTHING of consequence but you magats get excited every time they air something they say 'LOOKS BAD', as you then proclaim that is enough for charges or removal of Fani, which is will not be. BUt your claims of 'plenty of evidence' and celebration of that is very predictable.

It is all Magats have left. To dig into the private life of a drug addled Hunter and air the things that 'look bad' but ARE NOT IN ANY WAY criminal, and now to hope to do the same to Fani.

You guys are a joke. You cry about witch hunts while literally living for them.
 
Fani broke no laws. She created bad appearances. It looked bad. However, the case was produced legally and diligently. There is no reason to restart.
 
Jarod said:
How many of you were Trumpped?
Every single time you get Trumpped.
Another corrupt Judge? Hahahahahahahahaha!
Cnn.com
Click to expand...

The judge didn't rule that way. He mistakenly decided to give them a choice; either Fanni is off or her lover. The stench of Mendacity is all over this case and it will end in dissolution of the absurd charges and claims by these corrupt Democrats who got where they are by checking boxes.

This will now be left to the State of Georgia.
 
Concart said:
It was a ruling, and frankly a well thought out and legally sound ruling that will easily hold up under appeal. It isn't a 'trick'. The judge is doing his job. Not everything needs to be viewed through the lens of partisan politics.
Click to expand...

It was a pile of laughable bile. But alas, how could someone with an IQ lower than room temp lacking any formal education comprehend the OBVIOUS. :palm:
 
Concart said:
Yes, another corrupt judge that came out of the Federalist Society. The irony just drips off the page.
Click to expand...

Wrong: A judge who is looking at an election in two weeks trying to keep his job. It was a cowardly act to "split the baby" as he did. But alas, it is Fulton County where corruption is the name of the game.
 
QP! said:
Despite what idiots like TOP and others stated as a certainty, that the Judge would end the trial and exclude her, it was truly never in doubt amongst smarter people.

Top legal officials on the left and right almost all argued the threshold of removal 'actual conflict' not only has not been argued by those lawyers pushing it, but does not appear.

That something 'looks bad' in an HR type way, is NOT ENOUGH.

But Magats live off of 'looks bad' now as what they think should be enough when going after Dems, because that is typically the ONLY THING they can find, as all their prosecutions FAIL due to lack of FACTS or EVIDENCE and PROOF.


At no point was there ANYTHING even offered that got close to reaching the threshold of 'actual conflict' and that is why magats lost this.
Click to expand...

dumbass-dumb.gif
 
Nordberg said:
Fani broke no laws. She created bad appearances. It looked bad. However, the case was produced legally and diligently. There is no reason to restart.
Click to expand...

Nordy, she perjured herself…the DA in the most important case this century perjured herself. So did her lover.

Poor Nordy.
 
Nordberg said:
Fani broke no laws. She created bad appearances. It looked bad. However, the case was produced legally and diligently. There is no reason to restart.
Click to expand...
A bad appearance would be if she dated the judge or a Trump defense lawyer. Dating a consenting adult, peer is to me, not a bad look, it has absolutely no effect on the trial.
 
Earl said:
Nordy, she perjured herself…the DA in the most important case this century perjured herself. So did her lover.

Poor Nordy.
Click to expand...

Can you cite a ruling, any ruling, that she committed perjury? You must have a ruling to state something like that, as if fact, right?

And just for contrast what is your view on people citing 'Trump is a sexual assault/rapist', based on the Jury ruling and the Judge case finding? Are those FINDINGS enough to call him that, in your view?
 
Witness says DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade started ...

PBS
https://www.pbs.org › newshour › politics › witness-say...
Feb 15, 2024 — A former friend and co-worker of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis testified Thursday that Willis' personal relationship with a ...

Fanny (sic) lied. Perjury.

It’s hard to explain 12,000 Willis-Wade texts.
 
Last edited:
House Judiciary Committee launches inquiry into Fulton ...

CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2023/08/24 › politics › house-r...
Aug 24, 2023 — The Republican-led House Judiciary Committee has opened a congressional investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, ...

There is no Separation of Powers issue.
 
QP! said:
Can you cite a ruling, any ruling, that she committed perjury? You must have a ruling to state something like that, as if fact, right?

And just for contrast what is your view on people citing 'Trump is a sexual assault/rapist', based on the Jury ruling and the Judge case finding? Are those FINDINGS enough to call him that, in your view?
Click to expand...

your think corrupt judges dictate reality. that's your problem.

they both perjured themselves, that's obvious.
 
Earl said:
Witness says DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade started ...

PBS
https://www.pbs.org › newshour › politics › witness-say...
Feb 15, 2024 — A former friend and co-worker of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis testified Thursday that Willis' personal relationship with a ...

Fanny (sic) lied. Perjury.

It’s hard to explain 12,000 Willis-Wade texts.
Click to expand...

So, in your world, one persons testimony against another is perjury?
 
Phantasmal said:
A bad appearance would be if she dated the judge or a Trump defense lawyer. Dating a consenting adult, peer is to me, not a bad look, it has absolutely no effect on the trial.
Click to expand...

Only an uneducated dunce would make such a moronic statement. This isn't about a "consenting" adult. Hell, her predecessor was kicked out of office for doing the same thing.

You obviously watch way too much MSNBC which explains your ignorance and stupidity on every topic. :palm:
 
Jarod said:
So, in your world, one persons testimony against another is perjury?
Click to expand...

STRAWMAN ALERT!!! That's not what Earl said halfwit. Of course, low IQ leftist MSNBC viewers think lying under oath is perfectly okay if it is a Democrat trying to charge Trump on the flimsiest of charges.

You give new meaning to the term dishonest.
 
Jarod said:
You think any judge who rules against the Golden Calf named Trump is corrupt. Silly. You are duped.
Click to expand...

STRAWMAN ALERT! I don't think you can post without lying and bloviating laughably stupid strawmen. How did this judge rule against Trump in this case? Trump wasn't a party. It was one of his co-Defendents shit-for-brains. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top