Con Law - Lesson 1 "The Preamble"

SmarterthanYou said:
that's about what I expected from someone who only trusts 'experts'............maybe you're an expert? are you an expert on the constitution and constitutional law? if so, i need you to show me something
Click to expand...

So we should listen to someone who does not trust experts?. Then what do you trust? Of course, those who lean your way. That is a very poor response. We give much more weight to experts. We should.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
pretty sure hardly anyone in government office, or working for government officials, has actually read the constitution. Of those who have, whether government or private citizens, most of y'all don't even understand it.
Click to expand...

Those that were lawyers passed two classes on it, Con Law I and Con Law II.

That would include Obama, Biden and Clinton.
 
Nordberg said:
So we should listen to someone who does not trust experts?. Then what do you trust? Of course, those who lean your way. That is a very poor response. We give much more weight to experts. We should.
Click to expand...

that only makes you a moron of the highest caliber, unable to think for yourself and need 'experts' to tell them what to think and do...............but you aren't able to comprehend plain english anyway, so..........
 
So no Trumpper has answered my question, do any other f you think Trump ever read the constitution?
 
Jarod said:
Those that were lawyers passed two classes on it, Con Law I and Con Law II.

That would include Obama, Biden and Clinton.
Click to expand...

and all of them ignored the actual constitutional limits imposed upon them..........just like reagan, GW Bush 1 and 2, and trump...........but you won't see that with those blue colored blinders on
 
Jarod said:
A lot of Trumppers have never read the constitution, they have no idea what it says, except what some whacko on the internet says... Do any of you honestly believe Trump has ever read it?
Click to expand...

I give them a lot more credit than that. It's their wacky interpretations that cause problems.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and all of them ignored the actual constitutional limits imposed upon them..........just like reagan, GW Bush 1 and 2, and trump...........but you won't see that with those blue colored blinders on
Click to expand...

I agree that they all tried to push the bounds of presidential power beyond its limitations, such is the nature of most men who would do what it takes to be president.
 
Again I will ask, and the silence is very telling this far, do any Trumppers believe Trump ever read the constitution?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Okay, what's the 2nd amendment mean in terms of Rights?

Is it a collective Right? Is it an individual Right? For example...
Click to expand...

Are you talking about the regulated militia and trying to weasel your way from it? The second was seen as collective in Miller, I think it was 1949. They ruled that sawed-off shotguns could be eliminated. That meant nobody in any state could own them.
 
Originalists have been trying to tell us what the forefathers said in the Constitution. They will tell you that "It says, what it says?!

7b5193ab5d9c9cfad844fb2fbf03314f.jpeg


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Well?

4800b280f1425afc7742b60daae06373.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
I agree that they all tried to push the bounds of presidential power beyond its limitations, such is the nature of most men who would do what it takes to be president.
Click to expand...

that's obviously a good thing, in your mind, when it's a democrat....................not so with a republican..............tell me again you're not an idiotically biased moron.
 
Nordberg said:
Are you talking about the regulated militia and trying to weasel your way from it? The second was seen as collective in Miller, I think it was 1949. They ruled that sawed-off shotguns could be eliminated. That meant nobody in any state could own them.
Click to expand...

wrong. Miller didn't address the right, only the lack of evidence as it pertains to a short barreled shotgun. stop getting your bullshit from biased media sites. I can post numerous court cases before miller that clearly talk about an individual right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top