Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act

K

katsung47

Verified User
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/22/congress-cites-911-bush-cover-up-demands-obama-act/
 
katsung47 said:
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/22/congress-cites-911-bush-cover-up-demands-obama-act/
Click to expand...


Keep voting for Citizens United. As long as a Corporation can profit, a Corporation will invest....this is basic small brain stuff.
 
Just because Bush had the war plans for Afghanistan on his desk the day before 9/11 doesn't mean he manufactured 9/11. Bush was on vacation mostly because the Corporations were doing the work for him.

Watch the Documentary "Loose Change". Sadly, a majority of it lines up. But it isn't for Government Domination. It for Big Corporations to rebuild the twin towers like we are TODAY for some reason still rebuilding Iraq with tax payer money.

The Right Cries "Liberal Government" when they notice this abuse but don't realize they are part of the abuse when they support the Big Corp over Humanity.
 
katsung47 said:
What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11
Click to expand...

That's news? We've known that all along.

and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.
Click to expand...

Truther rants. Nothing new to see here either.
 
Saudi Royal criticizes US policy of inaction in Syria
Published December 17th, 2013
Click to expand...

Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".

It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples.
 
katsung47 said:
Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".

It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples.
Click to expand...

That's sheeples not steeples.
 
You mean Clarke was full of shit when he urged Bush White House officials months before Sept. 11 to meet to discuss what he saw as a severe threat from al Qaeda.?

Six years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the CIA warned in a classified report that Islamic extremists likely would strike on U.S. soil at landmarks in Washington or New York, or through the airline industry, according to intelligence officials.
And yet the terrorists strolled right in under Clinton,s nose...result, almost 3000 dead in NY.
Guess the first attack on the WTC didn't wake him up or distract him from his blow jobs either....

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-warned-of-us-attack-in-95/
 
katsung47 said:
Congress cites 9/11 Bush cover-up, demands Obama act
Sunday, December 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Gordon Duff


Two members of Congress, specially authorized to view documents on 9/11 censored under the personal authority of President Bush (43), have come away “absolutely shocked,” demanding immediate action.


Startling disclosures?



For nearly a decade, the US has maintained security policies, both domestic and international, based on threats now known to have been totally fabricated. The cost, trillions of dollars, thousands of Americans dead in wars against “enemies” long known to have never been involved in terror attacks on America, the phony “hunt for bin Laden,” all of it, nothing but utter hogwash.

Bush cited as conspirator

What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/22/congress-cites-911-bush-cover-up-demands-obama-act/
Click to expand...

LMAO: so do you get paid to be this stupid?
 
Anti-Party said:
Just because Bush had the war plans for Afghanistan on his desk the day before 9/11 doesn't mean he manufactured 9/11. Bush was on vacation mostly because the Corporations were doing the work for him.

Watch the Documentary "Loose Change". Sadly, a majority of it lines up. But it isn't for Government Domination. It for Big Corporations to rebuild the twin towers like we are TODAY for some reason still rebuilding Iraq with tax payer money.

The Right Cries "Liberal Government" when they notice this abuse but don't realize they are part of the abuse when they support the Big Corp over Humanity.
Click to expand...

LMAO
 
katsung47 said:
Saudi won't follow US as it used to be. That's why they released this news to intimidate. If you dare to criticize, we'll charge you for "committing 911 attack".

It is not an attempt to reveal the 911 truth. It is just another dirty political trick of intimidation. And they play you fools, poor steeples.
Click to expand...

LMAO
 
NOVA said:
You mean Clarke was full of shit when he urged Bush White House officials months before Sept. 11 to meet to discuss what he saw as a severe threat from al Qaeda.?

Six years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the CIA warned in a classified report that Islamic extremists likely would strike on U.S. soil at landmarks in Washington or New York, or through the airline industry, according to intelligence officials.
And yet the terrorists strolled right in under Clinton,s nose...result, almost 3000 dead in NY.
Guess the first attack on the WTC didn't wake him up or distract him from his blow jobs either....

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-warned-of-us-attack-in-95/
Click to expand...

Cark definately was full of shit thinking that anything prior to 9-11 was "actionable" intelligence.

The truth is, before 9-11, no one imagined that terrorists would fly airliners into high rise buildings OR, that the results would be a complete building collapse.

But equall retarded and off the charts is the assumption that Bush had anything to gain by "allowing" the 9-11 attacks to occur.

Why is dimwitted stuff like this in "current events?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top