should a majority vote to pass a law that removes the warrant necessity in drug related cases be passed?
Let me ask you this.... when the far-right ends up in power through the political vacuum this will cause, and the far-right-controlled Congress decides that homosexuals with AIDS, women seeking abortions, illegal aliens, drug addicts, and people with pre-existing illness in general, are NOT entitled to government-funded health care coverage, and there are no other options made available to these people... are you going to be okay with that? IF they manage to get this change made by bribing public officials and calling it "political sausage" and have to rely on procedural "deem and pass" rules to get it through... you gonna be content with that? I just want that on record NOW, so that when it happens, you won't be here bitching day and night about the Constitution being ignored. In fact, when Republicans take back control of Congress, pretty much anything they want to pass into law, is going to be passed, regardless of how solid the Democrat opposition is... no more of this "minority has a voice" shit... no more lectures on how our founders designed the system to give the minority a say and we are a representative republic and not a democracy... I don't want to hear those words ever come out of your mouth again after this! You have endorsed and sanctioned mob rule, and now you will live by it, by God!
I can't believe that the party supposedly against corporate welfare are the party supporting the ultimate corporate welfare...
No because the constitution gives you an affirmative right against unreasonable search and seizure.
maybe you didn't study history, but for a long time ALL of the new deal programs were ruled unconstitutional. 'court packing scheme' much?I can't believe all the lame arguments (socialism, unconstitutional) if that was true SS and Medicare/Medicaid would have been ruled such a long time ago.
Maybe you should study history. Are you trying to tell me that all these modern constitutional democracies around the world that have adopted UHC programs have been violating their own laws all these years or are utterly incapable of devising a legal system of health care reform that falls in the framework of their constitution? Are you telling me that we are incapable of doing so? What complete rubbish. That is utter nonsense and you know it.maybe you didn't study history, but for a long time ALL of the new deal programs were ruled unconstitutional. 'court packing scheme' much?
Let me ask you this.... when the far-right ends up in power through the political vacuum this will cause, and the far-right-controlled Congress decides that
homosexuals with AIDS,
women seeking abortions,
illegal aliens,
drug addicts,
and people with pre-existing illness in general,
are NOT entitled to government-funded health care coverage, and there are no other options made available to these people... are you going to be okay with that? !
what is nonsense is trying to equate other nations governments and laws with ours and expecting them to be equal. you and I both know that is not the case. To even think that they are is borderline insane.Maybe you should study history. Are you trying to tell me that all these modern constitutional democracies around the world that have adopted UHC programs have been violating their own laws all these years or are utterly incapable of devising a legal system of health care reform that falls in the framework of their constitution? Are you telling me that we are incapable of doing so? What complete rubbish. That is utter nonsense and you know it.
lets see if you can comprehend what some of us have been saying for decades. Insurance companies WERE a risk/reward proposition. They knew it, the government knew it, and back then the people knew it. NOW, because they've bought and paid for republican and democrat politicians and lobbyists, the PEOPLE think that insurance is some sort of right or guarantee to absolve themselves of critical thinking and responsibility. YOU, I say again YOU, have had a hand in this by supporting this bullshit.The amazing thing is while this debate is going on, Insurance companies around the country are dramatically raising premiums, lowering coverage, instituting limits and caps, adding more exclusions all for higher and higher prices while dropping coverage for more and more "high risk" individuals.
get people to stop going to emergency rooms with sniffles, or other some such nonsense when they can find themselves able to take care of themselves, STOP paying insurance company premiums, and I guarantee you that in order for insurance companies and medical care companies to make profit, they WILL lower their prices. econ 101 my friend.What does it take to get it through your heads that providing a quality public health system that is affordable and accesable to meet the needs of the public is conflict of interest with maximizing profits for Wall Street?
what is insane is you cowtowing to large corporate insurance conglomerates by mandating EVERYONE fork over money to them so they can become wealthier, and then pawning it off to the people as some sort of public benefit. why can't you get that through YOUR head?How many families have to go bankrupt so that a handful on insurance executives can be extraordinarily wealthy? How many business have to choose between droping coverage for their employees or going bankrupt?
You're just simply insane if you don't think the public good outweighs the need for Wallstreet to maximize profits at the publics expense.
i hope so, because it does need to be reformed. mandating that I buy a product to make others insurance more affordable isn't the way. If you do, and I refuse to comply, are you willing to have me killed?One way or the other a legal way will be found to implement health care reform in this nation. You can bank on that.
Liberals want doctors and patients to control health care. Conservatives want the insurance companies to control health care.
It is true that conservatives want people to die from lack of health care.
Republicans are opposing the American way.
People that are racist will always oppose our beloved President Barack Hussein Obama.
Way to go, Obama!
Dixtard is going to be upset for a long time. You kkk fuckers thought the same thing on black vote, ss, Medicare. What no reversals. Bahaha
more dixtard comedy to come. His head may explode when Obama gives the illegals amnesty.
You see it too?
I read Dix's posts and if you look closely you can see little by little, the seething, all-consuming hatred and rage that emanates from him continues to bubble closer and closer to the surface.
We're finally getting to see the REAL. racist Dix in all his hateful, terroristic threat issuing glory.
Should a majority of States needed to ratify such an amendment, then yes, according to the constitution it should be passed. What you are talking about is a Consitutional right. Laws on the other hand ARE indeed passed when a majority of the reps and senators vote yay, and a president signs it into law.should a majority vote to pass a law that removes the warrant necessity in drug related cases be passed?
Should a majority of States needed to ratify such an amendment, then yes, according to the constitution it should be passed. What you are talking about is a Consitutional right. Laws on the other hand ARE indeed passed when a majority of the reps and senators vote yay, and a president signs it into law.
. That's not the point and you know it. Comparing other constitutional democracies to ours is valid and the point is, if they can do it within their laws, then so can we.what is nonsense is trying to equate other nations governments and laws with ours and expecting them to be equal. you and I both know that is not the case. To even think that they are is borderline insane.
That's a straw man argument. No one is saying insurance is a right. They are saying access to adequate health care at a reasonable cost is a right.lets see if you can comprehend what some of us have been saying for decades. Insurance companies WERE a risk/reward proposition. They knew it, the government knew it, and back then the people knew it. NOW, because they've bought and paid for republican and democrat politicians and lobbyists, the PEOPLE think that insurance is some sort of right or guarantee to absolve themselves of critical thinking and responsibility. YOU, I say again YOU, have had a hand in this by supporting this bullshit.
get people to stop going to emergency rooms with sniffles, or other some such nonsense when they can find themselves able to take care of themselves, STOP paying insurance company premiums, and I guarantee you that in order for insurance companies and medical care companies to make profit, they WILL lower their prices. econ 101 my friend.
You got that backwards son. You're the one who'd brown nosing the insurance companies. The public good comes before their right to maximize profits at our expense and the public good.what is insane is you cowtowing to large corporate insurance conglomerates by mandating EVERYONE fork over money to them so they can become wealthier, and then pawning it off to the people as some sort of public benefit. why can't you get that through YOUR head?
Mandating that everyone maintain some health care coverage is one of the 3 proven principles of health care reform that works in controlling cost. It is the first important step that MUST be taken and if you don't comprehend this then you don't even belong in this conversation as you are grossly uninformed about health care issues.i hope so, because it does need to be reformed. mandating that I buy a product to make others insurance more affordable isn't the way. If you do, and I refuse to comply, are you willing to have me killed?
You should not change what I said and present it as such.Fixed that for you, Conservatard.