Thorn
Member
But hey, rhetoric is all you have left. You should consider a second career as a wind tunnel.
ROTFLMAO! That has to be the best line of the week.
Well, at least it would be a tangible contribution to the field of physics.
But hey, rhetoric is all you have left. You should consider a second career as a wind tunnel.
I know Solar can't power a car well enough to make it useful, which is why I suggested adding some other forms of creating energy to help replenish the energy needed to power a car. They may not be good ideas but at least they offer some discussion. I'm no engineer, not a MBA either, just a programmer that trys to find ways to automate things with as little effort as possible. Would be nice to see a car that we don't have to re-fuel and powers itself.
we do not know all the answers to physics/aka black holes.etc...it is mere speculation that all the great minds of the world have narrowed all the answers to our/your hypothesis...(just a educated guess) does not end the debate...if you believe this you are 'returning to the future' or is that the past? A great movie concept but by know means the end result..carry on though your professors did a great job limiting your thought process!
I already had my career..I am just having fun with know it all kids who claim to have the world by the proverbial balls...ain't gonna happen kido...your professors snowed ya from day one...carry on though ya are amusing me with all your self proclaimed knowledge of the world/universe and such!
I know Solar can't power a car well enough to make it useful, which is why I suggested adding some other forms of creating energy to help replenish the energy needed to power a car. They may not be good ideas but at least they offer some discussion. I'm no engineer, not a MBA either, just a programmer that tries to find ways to automate things with as little effort as possible. Would be nice to see a car that we don't have to re-fuel and powers itself.
The best plant for ethanol would be sugar cane. It yields energy at a ration of 8 units produced to 1 unit spent (in making it). This is slightly better than gas, which has a ratio of 5 to 1. Corn ethanol, on the other hand, yields energy at a ration of 1.3 to 1. Corn ethanol is NEVER going to be a viable alternative to gasoline.
However, cane sugar isn't a domestic crop. We'd have to import it. And the corn lobby will be against that, with their heavy lobbying. They can even do this lobbying behind the populist "I'm a farmer, so you have to help me" veil. So I guess we're just stuck with gas for the next 100 years, because the corn lobby killed ethanol with their greed.
You have a unique writing style, Don
I'd support the tariffs if there was even an inkling of a chance that any domestic crop would ever become as energy efficient as sugar cane. One of the few good arguments for tarriffs is that they will support an "infant industry", and help it bloom into a productive one. I just don't think that's a realistic expectation.
Ethanol in Brazil sells for like 1.50 a gallon. Try that with Ethanol in America. If we keep on this futile search for a domestic ethanol crop we're just going to be stuck with oil forever. And honestly - I'd rather be dependant on Brazil and other tropical, sugar cane producing nations than Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Umm looks like to many MBA's on here and not enough engineers.
Umm it takes energy to make energy in an alternator and there are losses involved in the transfer....
And as Trog said solar will never power an auto. Just not enough solar energy per sw ft.
Well maybe if your car had a 2500 sq ft solar cell sail on it....
w
the principal problem with sugar cane is that it is a foreign product
do we want to get back in the same mess of having other nations control our energy supply
w
perhaps we can grow enough sugar cane in hawaii and puerto rico, but be sure to add on the cost of transportation...but hey, we already have all those oil tankers
now would an ethanol spill be better or worse than an oil spill...ever stand down wind of a place where they are burning large amount of illegal mj
One of my mottoes is inconsistency in all things including inconsistency
Food is an interesting topic.
In the The Omen movies, controlling food with an ADM-like company was part of the anti-christ masterplan.
Paying farmers not to grow food..... just think of that. With our capabilities today, food could be created to be like air, like manna, just sitting around well preserved, for cents a day per person. But how would they control us. I mean "really" control us?
You're an idiot.
Jump up. You'll come down.
Put turbines on a car. It won't make more energy than your using with the motor.
Dozens of nations throughout the world grow sugar cane, they aren't really very unified, and none of them are fanatical. Do we really want to stay on oil for the next 50 years? Because that's the alternative.
Hydrogen, maybe one day. But I think this is an adequate in between.
Ethanol evaporates, unlike oil. I'm not sure how much damage it would cause. They actually use ethanol to disinfect toilets, if that gives you any idea of how bad it would be for the ecology. Also, the ethanol's denatured to avoid the liquor tax and so they can sell to people under 21, so just a small amount would kill an animal, although it may get a little bit tipsy beforehand.
Not what he was talking about.w
turbines are more efficient and have better torque than recprocating engines, but they are more expensive to manufacture and maintain