corporations the founders hated

Yeah

that will win this one for your party huh.


let me make this VERY clear to you



I want nothing to do with your tiny rancid penis.


put that miniscule pants worm back in your pants pervbot



stay away from the neighbors pets too (it is illegal for you to molest them)



this is a political site


if you don't like politics I suggest you find a wack off site.


I'm a chick


I just said no to your illegal sick assed sexual advances.



no means no


now what sociopath
 
evince said:
Yeah

that will win this one for your party huh.


let me make this VERY clear to you



I want nothing to do with your tiny rancid penis.


put that miniscule pants worm back in your pants pervbot



stay away from the neighbors pets too (it is illegal for you to molest them)



this is a political site


if you don't like politics I suggest you find a wack off site.


I'm a chick


I just said no to your illegal sick assed sexual advances.



no means no


now what sociopath
Click to expand...

Since I'm not the dog in your avatar, I don't really care what you do with it bitch. If you want to do those types of thing, go for it. God knows I wouldn't have anything to do with a slut like you.
 
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah


fuck you very much rancid pants worm boy


remember stalkers get dead arround me
 
evince said:
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate-accountability-history-corporations-us/



Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
Click to expand...




LETS DO WHAT THE FOUNDERS DID
 
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporat...rporations-us/



Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
 
evince said:
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporat...rporations-us/



Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
Click to expand...

answer
 
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporat...rporations-us/



Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top