corporations the founders hated

evince said:
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporat...rporations-us/



Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
Click to expand...







Accept



reality



this IS American history
 
evince said:
so you dont believe in history
Click to expand...

I don't believe you know history or what the concept of proving something means.

You're as bad as the negro The Dude. He says he wouldn't bet me then when I call him out on something he hasn't proven, he wants to bet. Too late. He already lost when he ran like a pussy.
 
Wolf Fuhrig of Jacksonvill has a doctorate in public law and government from Columbia University



who is good enough?
 
CFM said:
It's a blog you call a reliable source. Big difference.
Click to expand...

Wolf Fuhrig of Jacksonvill has a doctorate in public law and government from Columbia University


the man is fully qualified on the subject idiot


on wha criteria do you dismiss his authority on the subject?
 
Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:



◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.


◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.


◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.


◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.


◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight controll of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow
 
you can not produce any huh


you know why


because this is the real history you lying fucking traitor to this nation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top