OrnotBitwise
Watermelon
Fine. You try it. It's just barely medically possible now.
Court Clears Way for Egg Rights Showdown
- Thread starter uscitizen
- Start date
Dilloduck
Indifferent
To carry a fertilized egg to term ? Your kidding right ?
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
She doesn't have to, it's her choice. Maybe I should force your responsibility as an idiot to cut off your nuts?
Dilloduck
Indifferent
I was very proud to take responsibilty for the only egg I fertilized and still am. Over 18 years now---9 months of pregnancy? Cake walk compared to raising one.
OrnotBitwise
Watermelon
No, I'm not. There has been one (1) successful procedure.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Too bad. It's too late now.
Battleborne
Terminator
Quote of the year....!
This from the abortion MD...Liberals are really losing their mentality to think before they speak/write!
I oppose the death penalty, so your invocation thereof has little effect on me.
What are you blathering about? I'm talking about a very difficult moral choice faced by many women every single day. To wit: "is this a baby or is it just something that will be a baby someday?" That choice is exceedingly painful in every case I've ever seen. Statistics back that up, more to the point. I oppose any attempt to dictate to them how they must act.
The decision is hard enough without adding the stigma of criminality to it.
This from the abortion MD...Liberals are really losing their mentality to think before they speak/write!
Battleborne
Terminator
'Bump'
Just to refresh everyone what idiots orno and darla are...false outrage is their agenda...from 'the get go' a typical marxist ploy!
Just to refresh everyone what idiots orno and darla are...false outrage is their agenda...from 'the get go' a typical marxist ploy!
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Really? Just because you choose to ignore science, somehow my argument is feeble and emotional? It is a human life. Science dictates that. As stated earlier, you can argue whether or not the unborn child should have rights or not. But to act as if an abortion does anything but end a human life is ignorance. I don't blame you for thinking this way as many have been brainwashed by the attempts of the pro-abortion crowd to dehumanize the unborn child. They have been very successful at doing so for the feeble minded.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
I'll ask you the same question that Ornot has yet to answer....
"My question back to you would be this.... Note: purely philosophical in nature.... IF we could go back and choose for ourselves whether or not our parents should or should not abort us.... how many of us would then choose abortion?"
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Link please
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
It's not my decision. My opinion on the matter is irrelevant. It's like asking all the trillions of sperm that could of been "If you had the option, would you have had your parents have sex at just the right time so that you could reach the egg?"
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Darla was the one with all the faux rage. Ornot and I were actually having a civilized conversation before she came in with her little tirade about Iraq. Apparently according to her we are only allowed to discuss Iraq. To her, a person cannot hold the belief that abortion ends a human life, because you see SHE doesn't believe that. So to her it is ok to DELIBERATELY kill millions of unborn children.... because to her they are just clumps of cells, they have been dehumanized and thus they are disposable at will.... no big deal. SCIENCE? Who needs science... unless of course you are talking about global warming or evolution.... THEN a person has to be an idiot to refute science. But in this case it is ok, because the pro-abortion crowd has come up with a nice game of circle jerk with words to try and attempt to muddy the water.
"It is human and alive, but it is not like ya know a human being or like well uh a person"
Ignore the fact that a being is a state of existence and a person is a human being. Nah... why look at the definitions of the word.... lets just make shit up... far easier on the conscience that way.... and if someone contradicts us with the facts, then we will simply call THEM emotional... add in a few additional parrots from the far left nuthouse and BANG... millions of dead dehumanized children and no loss of sleep.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Thats what I thought. Duck the question..... that pretty much gives me the answer
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
How am I ducking the question? It's not my right to decide that.
No one has been charged EVER IN HISTORY for killing a fertilized egg, I repeat NO ONE. And Scott peterson could not be charged with killing a fertilized egg.
Scott peterson, in fact could not be charged for killing a viable fetus either, UNLESS HE KILLED THE FETUS'S MOTHER, which he did, then he had an added charge, under california law in 2001, which labels the ''baby to be'' a "victim", a human victim, not a person that has achieved personhood by taking their first breath.
Just an FYI.
Care
Last edited:
This is incorrect. If he were to... Oh let's say... Hit her car while DUI, and she lost the developing progeny but not her life, he could then be charged for murder.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
That's stupid and completely contradictory.
They are not killed before they attach to the uterus. They do die naturally because of that, however arresting mother nature for such activity would be fruitless.
And they are also not killed within the first week or two, most women do not know they are pregnant in those first two weeks.