Creationist child abusers close doors

monty1 said:
Creationist beliefs can't be reconciled with evolution. As soon as you try to do that then you will have fallen into the trap.
Click to expand...

silly claim remains silly.....it can be reconciled if you don't have some fantasy understanding of evolution.....

If you are a modern Christian who has discarded upwards of 90% of Christian teaching in order to stay abreast of the times then I have little interest in what you say. It would just be a complete compromising of Christian beliefs. It would represent a rejection on your part of religion.
Click to expand...

I believe that God created everything, that humanity was disobedient and that God provided us with a means of reconciliation if we accept it.......what's the 90% you refer to?.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
silly claim remains silly.....it can be reconciled if you don't have some fantasy understanding of evolution.....



I believe that God created everything, that humanity was disobedient and that God provided us with a means of reconciliation if we accept it.......what's the 90% you refer to?.......
Click to expand...

Then you should also believe in those unicorns.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
shucks, I'm still waiting for you to show how this document proved life wasn't created.......
Click to expand...

I did not say it proved a fucking thing, you idiot. You are the one that claims it proves things. You just only want it to prove the things that are useful to your bullshit fairy tales and reject everything else it states. I said it indicates that the earth could not have been created or seeded with life by an intelligent designer. You ignore that part of the paper and use only what furthers your absurdly stupid ideas.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
subject for a different discussion......this is about whether there's been sufficient time for intelligent life to evolve to its current condition.....I will spot you bacteria as a starting point......discuss....
Click to expand...

According to the Cornell paper, yes there is sufficient time, without spotting bacteria.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
silly claim remains silly.....it can be reconciled if you don't have some fantasy understanding of evolution.....



I believe that God created everything, that humanity was disobedient and that God provided us with a means of reconciliation if we accept it.......what's the 90% you refer to?.......
Click to expand...

You are the one with the fantasy ideas of evolution claiming that all of "cat kind" derived from one species through adapting to its environments in the last 6000 years or less.

The only way around that is your rejection of the bible and evolution to come up with your idiotic hybrid cult.
 
Professor Baxter said:
I did not say it proved a fucking thing, you idiot. You are the one that claims it proves things. You just only want it to prove the things that are useful to your bullshit fairy tales and reject everything else it states. I said it indicates that the earth could not have been created or seeded with life by an intelligent designer. You ignore that part of the paper and use only what furthers your absurdly stupid ideas.
Click to expand...

sure you did....
Professor Baxter said:
On the other hand the paper from the other thread DID indicate that it was not possible that the earth was created by an intelligent designer. You ignored that and picked out only the parts that support your fairy tales about the immortal Adam, Eve and their vegetarian pet dinosaurs in the magical garden of Eden.
Click to expand...
 
PostmodernProphet said:
silly claim remains silly.....it can be reconciled if you don't have some fantasy understanding of evolution.....



I believe that God created everything, that humanity was disobedient and that God provided us with a means of reconciliation if we accept it.......what's the 90% you refer to?.......
Click to expand...

The 90% apparently doesn't apply to you. I was referring to those who reject the literal interpretation of their bible. People who don't believe that the Grand Canyon was created by the great flood or people who don't accept the bible's literal interpretation of the Noah's ark story. You obviously don't in either case and so what I said applies.

subject for a different discussion......this is about whether there's been sufficient time for intelligent life to evolve to its current condition.....I will spot you bacteria as a starting point......discuss....
Click to expand...

Thanks for spotting me that much. No, I won't and don't care to because anything you say will of necessity be based on a false understanding of science. You haven't paid attention to what I've been saying. We can't argue science against creationist beliefs because we have absolutely no common ground on which to begin. Everything you present as a fact about creation will fly directly in the face of science and vice versa. Why would you want to argue with me? Is it your method of attempting to strengthen your beliefs? I have no such desire and feel quite content to accept scientific theories until proven to be incorrect. Some obviously will be but I doubt there will be a single theory that will be disproven by religious beliefs. I've never been aware of any.

Argue with somebody who is interested in your arguments for creationist beliefs. I can't even begin with that. Simply because you need to rely on your flawed views of science in order to argue.

I suppose that if you came from another angle, such as forwarding evidence to show that creation was actually possible then that would be a situation where science could be called upon to rebut it all.

Here's a possibility: Show me some evidence that supports the creationist claim that the earth is approximately ten thousand years old. Or show me some evidence that dinosaur bones are roughly that old. You see, that would be an argument that you could present from your own ground. Don't try to argue from my ground which is science.
 
Professor Baxter said:
You are the one with the fantasy ideas of evolution claiming that all of "cat kind" derived from one species through adapting to its environments in the last 6000 years or less.

The only way around that is your rejection of the bible and evolution to come up with your idiotic hybrid cult.
Click to expand...

is it part of your fantasy to believe I think the earth is 6000 years old?......we've covered that several times already.....not sure why you continue to pretend its what I believe......
 
Professor Baxter said:
Science proves that life can evolve beyond "kinds"? Well, it is news to me that you accept that (though kind is creationist nonsense). Now then, that's not macroevolution?
Click to expand...

She's doing nothing more than attempting to reconcile her beliefs to herself. The best way to defeat that sort of Christian is to agree with them because that's not what they are craving. So the best thing you can do is to present evidence to her that the earth is about ten thousand years old. Or some such nonsense because it takes the wind out of their sails immediately.

And by arguing with her you are actually proving that you are as big a fool as she is. You actually think you could win an argument with the faithful???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top